On fre, 2009-10-30 at 19:08 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2009/10/30 Heikki Linnakangas :
> > Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >> 2009/10/30 Heikki Linnakangas :
> >>> To keep the compiler quiet about using the variables uninitialized. The
> >>> compiler doesn't know that ereport(ERROR) never returns.
> >>
>
2009/10/30 Heikki Linnakangas :
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2009/10/30 Heikki Linnakangas :
>>> Pavel Stehule wrote:
else
{
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_FUNCTION_DEFINITION),
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2009/10/30 Heikki Linnakangas :
>> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> else
>>> {
>>> ereport(ERROR,
>>> (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_FUNCTION_DEFINITION),
>>>errmsg("function result type must be
>>> sp
2009/10/30 Heikki Linnakangas :
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> else
>> {
>> ereport(ERROR,
>> (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_FUNCTION_DEFINITION),
>> errmsg("function result type must be
>> specified")));
>>
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> else
> {
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_FUNCTION_DEFINITION),
>errmsg("function result type must be
> specified")));
> /* Alternative possibility: default to RE
Hello
I found some strange code. Is code in "ELSE" part dead, or its bug?
if (stmt->returnType)
{
/* explicit RETURNS clause */
compute_return_type(stmt->returnType, languageOid,
&prorettype,
