2008/9/2 Ryan Bradetich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello Simon,
>
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 19:57 -0700, Ryan Bradetich wrote:
>>> I just wanted to throw out another possible use for this GUC. There
>>> maybe a better way to
>>>
Hello Simon,
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 19:57 -0700, Ryan Bradetich wrote:
>> I just wanted to throw out another possible use for this GUC. There
>> maybe a better way to
>> solve this problem, but I believe this patch would be
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 19:57 -0700, Ryan Bradetich wrote:
> I am not sure of the status of the patch, but I did read through the
> thread at:
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg00054.php
>
>
> I just wanted to throw out another possible use for this GUC. There
> maybe
Hello,
Sorry for the new thread on this topic, I did not have a copy in my inbox I
could replay to :(
I am not sure of the status of the patch, but I did read through the thread
at:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg00054.php
I just wanted to throw out another possible
