On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> 2016-01-26 2:00 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier :
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Pavel Stehule
>> wrote:
>> > Vitaly Burovoy pointed on bug in my patch - a pg_size_bytes was VOLATILE
>> > function. It is copy/paste bug - I used pg_size
2016-01-26 2:00 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier :
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Pavel Stehule
> wrote:
> > Vitaly Burovoy pointed on bug in my patch - a pg_size_bytes was VOLATILE
> > function. It is copy/paste bug - I used pg_size_pretty definition, so the
> > question is: why pg_size_pretty is v
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Vitaly Burovoy pointed on bug in my patch - a pg_size_bytes was VOLATILE
> function. It is copy/paste bug - I used pg_size_pretty definition, so the
> question is: why pg_size_pretty is volatile? It should be immutable too.
+1. This function
Hi
Vitaly Burovoy pointed on bug in my patch - a pg_size_bytes was VOLATILE
function. It is copy/paste bug - I used pg_size_pretty definition, so the
question is: why pg_size_pretty is volatile? It should be immutable too.
Regards
Pavel