Re: [HACKERS] xpath improvement V2

Jan Urbański wrote: Arie Bikker wrote: Hi all, I've combined the review suggestions of Jan Urbański, Scott Bailey, and others. This was a lot harder, then I had foreseen; and I took my time to do it the right way (hope you agree!). Hi, I see the patch has been marked as "Returned with Feedba

Re: [HACKERS] xpath improvement V2

Arie Bikker wrote: > Hi all, > > I've combined the review suggestions of Jan Urbański, Scott Bailey, and > others. > This was a lot harder, then I had foreseen; and I took my time to do it > the right way (hope you agree!). Hi, I see the patch has been marked as "Returned with Feedback" on the 6

Re: [HACKERS] xpath improvement V2 with xml.c

And a patch for the code implementing this *** doc/src/sgml/func.sgml.org Tue Feb 2 12:53:59 2010 --- doc/src/sgml/func.sgml Fri Feb 12 21:49:01 2010 *** *** 1,4 ! Functions and Operators --- 1,4 ! Functions and Operators *** *** 821,827

Re: [HACKERS] xpath improvement V2

And here is the patch. *** doc/src/sgml/func.sgml.org Tue Feb 2 12:53:59 2010 --- doc/src/sgml/func.sgml Fri Feb 12 21:49:01 2010 *** *** 1,4 ! Functions and Operators --- 1,4 ! Functions and Operators *** *** 821,827

[HACKERS] xpath improvement V2

Hi all, I've combined the review suggestions of Jan Urbański, Scott Bailey, and others. This was a lot harder, then I had foreseen; and I took my time to do it the right way (hope you agree!). BTW. really appreciate your efforts, so far, to enlighten me on nuub errors/mistakes in the previous v