Euler Taveira de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Tom has done the zic updates to 2006n.
>>
> What about update it to 2006o? It's from 11/06/2006 [1].
[ shrug... ] And by the time we release 8.2, it'll no doubt have
changed twice more. Folks who live in countries w
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom has done the zic updates to 2006n.
>
What about update it to 2006o? It's from 11/06/2006 [1].
[1] ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: i
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joachim Wieland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Current beta seems to have the 2006k version of the zic database. The
> > current
> > zic database is version 2006n however. Since this update does not include
> > source code but just data files I would vote to do the update in b
"Joachim Wieland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Current beta seems to have the 2006k version of the zic database. The current
> zic database is version 2006n however. Since this update does not include
> source code but just data files I would vote to do the update in beta, what
> do others think?
Current beta seems to have the 2006k version of the zic database. The current
zic database is version 2006n however. Since this update does not include
source code but just data files I would vote to do the update in beta, what
do others think?
One prominent update concerns Brazil which changes to
