In fact: http://oosurvey.gratismania.ro/stats
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > Justin,
> >
> > > From memory, the OpenOffice.org surveys still run from the techdocs
> > > virtual machine too. That may or may not be the case these
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Justin,
>
> > From memory, the OpenOffice.org surveys still run from the techdocs
> > virtual machine too. That may or may not be the case these days, I just
> > don't remember.
>
> Really? I thought that they were running from one of Sun's machines.
Justin,
> From memory, the OpenOffice.org surveys still run from the techdocs
> virtual machine too. That may or may not be the case these days, I just
> don't remember.
Really? I thought that they were running from one of Sun's machines. Will
check with Cristian.
If we're hosting the
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 13:51, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > really the most important thing here is that we get some movement on the
> > > site in order to ditch the old VM the site lives on and get it on our new
> > > web VM.
> >
> > On techdocs? What part
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 13:51, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > really the most important thing here is that we get some movement on the
> > site in order to ditch the old VM the site lives on and get it on our new
> > web VM.
>
> On techdocs? What part of that needs to be migrated?
>
Last I check it was
emeritus is a perfectly good latin word. No need to
dumb things down.
--elein
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 05:26:29PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > B) What contributors are listed under Major Developers who haven't
> > > contributed an
Alvaro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Josh Berkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: Friday, November 07, 2003 09:34 AM
Betreff: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
[...]
> > How can we help?
>
>
Tom,
> Peter appeared to be asking how additional people could get involved.
> Or do you *want* to keep the web group too small to get things done?
Ooops! Sorry, Peter, I *completely* mis-read your e-mail.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end
Robert,
> on techdocs there is a todo.php file which is probably completely bogus.
> theres some indecision on the direction of this site. I would like to
> convert the whole thing to CVS, including the wiki pages that comprised the
> guides section. others are testing using bricolage to make a n
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >>I think we had agreed that formerly-listed contributors would not be
> >>deleted, but would be moved to a new section titled "Contributors
> >>Emeritus" or some such. Please make sure that Tom Lockhart and Vadim
> >>get listed that way, at least.
> >
> > I think
Robert Treat writes:
> I disagree... the tech and the content are separate issues, let's keep
> them that way or we'll never make progress on either of them.
Just because one solution is technically more simple, it doesn't mean that
it is the overall best solution.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 06:32, Andreas Grabmüller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> well, the most of the programming itself is done, what's currently missing is
>
> 1) Some fine tuning on the layout
> 2) Adding the static pages
> 3) Translating the pages, news, events etc. into german and maybe some other
> l
Well the current argument aside, I do find it discouraging that there is
a considerable difference between the four sites, advocacy, gborg, dev,
and the main site, not only in form but in substance.
I am listed on the dev site as a major contributor, but not on the
advocacy site. Where was the li
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 November 2003 22:18
> To: Robert Treat
> Cc: Alvaro Herrera; Dave Page; Josh Berkus;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contrib
On Thursday 06 November 2003 17:18, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Robert Treat writes:
> >
> > we don't need links, we need patches
> >
>
> Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
>
> How does one get involved?
post proposals to pgsql-www and start coding
> Where is the code?
http
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter,
>> Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
> This isn't helping. What Robert was pointing out is that we don't
> currently have enough people writing HTML and PHP to finish improving
> the site anytime soon.
Peter appeared to be
Peter,
> Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
This isn't helping. What Robert was pointing out is that we don't currently
have enough people writing HTML and PHP to finish improving the site anytime
soon. Robert doesn't need "managerial direction."
Or did you have amb
Robert Treat writes:
>
> we don't need links, we need patches
>
Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
How does one get involved?
Where is the code?
What is the plan?
Where is the roadmap?
Where can issues be discussed?
Who is working on this?
How can we help?
--
Peter Ei
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 09:46, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:25:38AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > The advocacy site does have different requirements than the main site,
> > namely its bi-lingualness and the different target audience, but perhaps
> > with adding bi-lingual ca
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 November 2003 14:47
> To: Robert Treat
> Cc: Dave Page; Peter Eisentraut; Josh Berkus;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contrib
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:25:38AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> The advocacy site does have different requirements than the main site,
> namely its bi-lingualness and the different target audience, but perhaps
> with adding bi-lingual capabilities to the main site these two sites
> could be brough
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 03:21, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 05 November 2003 23:11
> > To: Josh Berkus
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
> >
> >
Emeritus is verbatin from Latin and is really very spread into most Western
languages.
--
Paulo Scardine
>
> I think the "Emeritus" word might be too hard for non-native English
> speakers, and even for less educated English speakers.
---(end of broadcast)---
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 November 2003 22:27
> To: Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
>
> Guys,
>
>
I think the "Emeritus" word might be too hard for non-native English
speakers, and even for less educated English speakers.
Isn't that an even better reason to use it? :)
My personal opinion would be that they can use dictionary.com if they
don't know what it means.
Chris
---
I think we had agreed that formerly-listed contributors would not be
deleted, but would be moved to a new section titled "Contributors
Emeritus" or some such. Please make sure that Tom Lockhart and Vadim
get listed that way, at least.
I think the "Emeritus" word might be too hard for non-native En
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
B) What contributors are listed under Major Developers who haven't
contributed any code since 7.1.0?
I think we had agreed that formerly-listed contributors would not be
deleted, but would be moved to a n
Neil Conway writes:
> Personally, I don't really see the need for developer.postgresql.org
> to be a separate sub-site. Since it is basically just a collection of
> links to other resources (CVSweb, TODO list, devel docs build, etc.),
> why not just make it a page or two on www.postgresql.org?
I
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, and how about we kill the Image Map of major developers? It's about 4
> years out of date, and makes developers.postgresql.org load like molasses in
> January.
Personally, I don't really see the need for developer.postgresql.org
to be a separate su
Tom,
> Yeah. It was cute when we did it but it's overkill as a way of pointing
> out that we have a worldwide development community. We can just say
> that...
I'll be happy to re-do it someday using OOo's imagemapper. But not this week
...
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Fra
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Oh, and how about we kill the Image Map of major developers? It's about 4
>> years out of date, and makes developers.postgresql.org load like molasses in
>> January.
> Agreed.
Yeah. It was cute when we did it but it's overkill
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Oh, and how about we kill the Image Map of major developers? It's about 4
> years out of date, and makes developers.postgresql.org load like molasses in
> January.
Agreed. I think Jan is the only one who knows how to updated it. Jan?
--
Bruce Momjian
Guys,
Oh, and how about we kill the Image Map of major developers? It's about 4
years out of date, and makes developers.postgresql.org load like molasses in
January.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)--
Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > B) What contributors are listed under Major Developers who haven't
> > contributed any code since 7.1.0?
>
> I think we had agreed that formerly-listed contributors would not be
> deleted, but would be moved to a new section titled "Con
34 matches
Mail list logo
