Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-17 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Josh Berkus wrote: Why is there significant delay on important posts, yet some posts go almost straight though? Every time I use Announce my posts are delayed for about 4-5 days. Why do some posts jump the queue, appearing to imply the moderator is being selective in

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-17 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:29, Marc G. Fournier scra...@hub.org wrote: On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Josh Berkus wrote: Why is there significant delay on important posts, yet some posts go almost straight though? Every time I use Announce my posts are delayed for about 4-5 days. Why do some posts

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-17 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 What I'm referring to? The fact that at least last time I was looking at this, most (all other?) moderators *only* approve things. And never reject them, instead letting the timeout take care of things thatn shouldn't be posted. Certainly

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-17 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Magnus Hagander wrote: What I'm referring to? The fact that at least last time I was looking at this, most (all other?) moderators *only* approve things. And never reject them, instead letting the timeout take care of things thatn shouldn't be posted. That means that if

Re: [pgsql-www] ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-17 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 13:22 +, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 What I'm referring to? The fact that at least last time I was looking at this, most (all other?) moderators *only* approve things. And never reject them, instead letting the

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-17 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Marc G. Fournier's message of jue jun 17 10:47:41 -0400 2010: I sooo agree here ... and to make matters worse, when I go through all of the groups once a week, I find a half dozen or more postings that 'slipped through the cracks' that should have been approved, but weren't

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-17 Thread Greg Smith
Marc G. Fournier wrote: Anyone volunteering ... ? Adding is simple enough ... I can help with moderating announce, having now gotten used to doing the similar chore for things submitted to the web site for a few months. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training,

ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-16 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 16:12 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: This was just posted to announce. I notice you mention that this was just posted to the ANNOUNCE list. Who is it that moderates the announce list? The postings made by David Fetter on 13 June and postings by David Wheeler on 15 June were

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-16 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:27, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 16:12 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: This was just posted to announce. I notice you mention that this was just posted to the ANNOUNCE list. Who is it that moderates the announce list? I can't answer

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-16 Thread Josh Berkus
Why is there significant delay on important posts, yet some posts go almost straight though? Every time I use Announce my posts are delayed for about 4-5 days. Why do some posts jump the queue, appearing to imply the moderator is being selective in releasing some, yet not others? Do we need

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 13:05 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:27, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 16:12 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: This was just posted to announce. I notice you mention that this was just posted to the ANNOUNCE

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 10:34 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: Why is there significant delay on important posts, yet some posts go almost straight though? Every time I use Announce my posts are delayed for about 4-5 days. Why do some posts jump the queue, appearing to imply the moderator is

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-16 Thread Josh Berkus
And me, and devrim and a number of others. Hmmm. Yet nothing seems to get approved unless I personal e-mail Marc. Why? -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-16 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
I don't moderate -announce. -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL DBA @ Akinon/Markafoni, Red Hat Certified Engineer devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz 17.Haz.2010 tarihinde 00:58 saatinde, Joshua D. Drake

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:01 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: And me, and devrim and a number of others. Hmmm. Yet nothing seems to get approved unless I personal e-mail Marc. Why? I approved stuff today and yesterday. I didn't the week before because I was in Chicago. I also normally don't

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 01:17 +0300, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: I don't moderate -announce. Sorry. I thought you did. JD -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering -- Sent via

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-16 Thread Josh Berkus
Hmmm. Yet nothing seems to get approved unless I personal e-mail Marc. Why? I approved stuff today and yesterday. I didn't the week before because I was in Chicago. I also normally don't moderate on the weekends. I was the one that approved the PGXN email for example. This week isn't

Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: [HACKERS] New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 16:08 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: Hmmm. Yet nothing seems to get approved unless I personal e-mail Marc. Why? I approved stuff today and yesterday. I didn't the week before because I was in Chicago. I also normally don't moderate on the weekends. I was the one