Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add _PG_init to PL language handler documentation

2010-06-09 Thread Joshua Tolley
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 04:18:08PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote: > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:47:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Jonathan Leto wrote: > >> > This tiny doc patch adds _PG_init to the skeleto

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add _PG_init to PL language handler documentation

2010-06-08 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:47:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Jonathan Leto wrote: >> > This tiny doc patch adds _PG_init to the skeleton example code for a >> > PL. The information is quite valuable to PL

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add _PG_init to PL language handler documentation

2010-05-26 Thread Joshua Tolley
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:47:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Jonathan Leto wrote: > > This tiny doc patch adds _PG_init to the skeleton example code for a > > PL. The information is quite valuable to PL authors, who might miss it > > when it is described in the s

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add _PG_init to PL language handler documentation

2010-05-26 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Jonathan Leto wrote: > This tiny doc patch adds _PG_init to the skeleton example code for a > PL. The information is quite valuable to PL authors, who might miss it > when it is described in the shared library documentation. I'm not sure it does much good to add i