Jaime,
* Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* Jaime Casanova ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 7/25/08, Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'm working on it
hi, any work on it? may i help?
If you look at the commitfest, I've posted my WIP so far there. Most of
the
On 9/17/08, Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A piece which can be broken off pretty easily is adding support to track
the columns used through to the executor so we can check the permissions
in the right place.
Jamie, have you had a chance to work on this? It's next on my list and
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In short, this patch isn't much more ready to commit than it was
in the last fest.
Just for the record, i put this updated patch just because there were
an entry for Extending grant insert on tables to sequences for this
Commit
Jaime,
* Jaime Casanova ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 7/25/08, Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'm working on it
hi, any work on it? may i help?
If you look at the commitfest, I've posted my WIP so far there. Most of
the grammer, parser, and catalog changes are there. There's
Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Jaime Casanova ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
updating the patch with one that only extends inserts. though, i
haven't look at the col level privs patch yet.
At least initially I wasn't planning to support column-level privileges
for sequences, so I
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Jaime Casanova ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
updating the patch with one that only extends inserts. though, i
haven't look at the col level privs patch yet.
At least initially I wasn't planning to support
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added to September commit fest.
updating the patch with one that only extends inserts. though, i
haven't look at the col level privs patch yet.
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y
* Jaime Casanova ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added to September commit fest.
updating the patch with one that only extends inserts. though, i
haven't look at the col level privs patch yet.
At least initially I
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added to September commit fest.
why? there isn't a new patch yet... i haven't sent it because i want
to see the column level privileges patch first because Tom's
complaints
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y
Added to September commit fest.
---
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2008-07-09 15:11:25 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, actually I meant having a lone list = lappend(list, newseq); in
the loop, so that
On 7/25/08, Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jaime Casanova ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
ok, seems this is the last one for column level patch
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-04/msg00417.php
any one working it...
Yes, I'm working on it
hi, any work on it? may i
* Jaime Casanova ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
ok, seems this is the last one for column level patch
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-04/msg00417.php
any one working it...
Yes, I'm working on it, but I'm not against having help, of course. The
past couple weeks have been given
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jaime Casanova ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
ok, seems this is the last one for column level patch
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-04/msg00417.php
any one working it...
Yes, I'm working on it, but I'm
Sorry for the delay in the answer but i was busy with 2 projects and a talk...
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's probably reasonable as long as we keep the implicitly
granted rights as narrow as possible. INSERT on the parent table
would normally
Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another issue is the interaction with the planned column-level GRANT
feature.
Although that is a feature we want, is a WIP one... do we stop patches
because it can conflict with a project we don't know will be applied
soon?
Well, considering that
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another issue is the interaction with the planned column-level GRANT
feature.
Although that is a feature we want, is a WIP one... do we stop patches
because it can conflict with a
At 2008-07-11 11:57:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
attached is a new version of the patch, it implements Alvaro's
suggestion and fix a bug i found (it wasn't managing GRANT ALL) :(
Looks good to me.
About the SELECT issue, AFAIU Robert doesn't complaint he just asked
what is the use
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
para
! Granting permission on a table automatically extend
! permissions to any sequences owned by the table, including
! sequences tied to typeSERIAL/ columns.
/para
Should be Granting
At 2008-07-12 14:32:03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should be Granting permissions on a table automatically extends
those permissions to
what about extends them to...
Yes, sounds fine, thanks.
But I notice that nobody else has commented on whether they want this
feature or not.
Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+ if (istmt.all_privs)
+ istmt_seq.all_privs = true;
+ else
+ {
+ if (istmt.privileges ACL_INSERT)
+ istmt_seq.privileges |= ACL_USAGE;
+
Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I notice that nobody else has commented on whether they want this
feature or not. Does anyone particularly dislike the idea?
I think it's probably reasonable as long as we keep the implicitly
granted rights as narrow as possible. INSERT on the
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2008-07-09 15:11:25 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, actually I meant having a lone list = lappend(list, newseq); in
the loop, so that ExecGrantStmt_oids is called only once.
Yes, I understand what you meant. I
At 2008-07-08 09:32:44 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea of this patch is to avoid the need to make explicit
grants on sequences owned by tables. [...]
I had a look at this patch and it looks good. The only thing that's
not clear to me is whether we have agreed we want this to be
Abhijit Menon-Sen escribió:
At 2008-07-08 09:32:44 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it be clearer to build a list with all the sequences owned by
the tables in istmt.objects, and then call ExecGrantStmt_oids() a
single time with the big list?
i.e., to hoist most of the istmt_seq
At 2008-07-09 15:11:25 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, actually I meant having a lone list = lappend(list, newseq); in
the loop, so that ExecGrantStmt_oids is called only once.
Yes, I understand what you meant. I just phrased my agreement poorly.
Here's a more precise phrasing. ;-)
(I
25 matches
Mail list logo
