On 7/5/2004 6:16 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 22:30, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...While recovering, it is very straightforward to simply ignore every
record associated with one (or more) transactions. That gives us the
ability to recover all apart
On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 15:04, Jan Wieck wrote:
On 7/5/2004 6:16 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 22:30, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...While recovering, it is very straightforward to simply ignore every
record associated with one (or more)
On 7/10/2004 3:21 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 15:04, Jan Wieck wrote:
...Nobody is shouting YES, so its a dodo...
No way!
Sorry...I meant this idea is dead, just like the extinct Dodo bird.-
I've been trying to be succinct, but that has led to information loss.
I know, preserve
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 00:30, Mike Mascari wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 23:40, Mike Mascari wrote:
hmmm...not sure I know what you mean.
It is very-very-close-to-impossible to edit the transaction logs
manually, unless some form of special-format editor were
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...While recovering, it is very straightforward to simply ignore every
record associated with one (or more) transactions. That gives us the
ability to recover all apart from txnid X.
Don't even *think* of going there.
What will happen when transaction Y
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 22:30, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...While recovering, it is very straightforward to simply ignore every
record associated with one (or more) transactions. That gives us the
ability to recover all apart from txnid X.
Don't even *think* of
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 23:40, Mike Mascari wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
...Nobody is shouting YES, so its a dodo...
The point at which the above process becomes
too complex (or less than obvious) for hand-recovery is precisely
when unforeseen consequences of nixing a single transaction
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 23:40, Mike Mascari wrote:
hmmm...not sure I know what you mean.
It is very-very-close-to-impossible to edit the transaction logs
manually, unless some form of special-format editor were written for the
purpose.
Is it clear that the PITR features are
