On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote:
...snip...
>
> > Data partitioning is often done within a single database on a single
> > server and therefore, as a concept, has nothing whatsoever to do with
> > different servers. Similarly, the second paragraph of this section is
>
> Uh, why would
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:06:13PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> Unfortunately the techdocs system won't support a url like the one above,
> rather you'll end up with something more like the following
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.54 which is the "GUI Tools Guide"
> (which is link
On Thursday 26 October 2006 10:45, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 05:46:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > So, like www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs/replication? That would
> > > work.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> I like that idea, but I think that the URL needs t
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> Bruce,
>
> > It isn't designed for that. It is designed for people to understand
> > what they want, and then they can look around for solutions. I think
> > most agree we don't want a list of solutions in the documentation,
> > though I have a few as
Hi,
A typo:
("a write to any server has to be _propogated_")
s/propogated/propagated
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Here is a new replication documentation section I want to add for 8.2:
ftp://momjian.us/pub/postgresql/mypatches/replication
Comments welcomed.
--
Regards,
Alexey Klyukin
With no new additions submitted today, I have moved my text into our
SGML documentation:
http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/failover.html
Please let me know what additional changes are needed.
---
bruce wro
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 05:46:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > So, like www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs/replication? That would work.
>
> Yes.
I like that idea, but I think that the URL needs to be decided upon,
needs to be stable, and needs to be put into the docs. (
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > Most people didn't want a list because there is no way to keep it
> > current in the docs, and a secondary web site was suggested for the
> > list.
>
> So, like www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs/replication? That would work.
Yes.
--
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL P
Bruce,
> Most people didn't want a list because there is no way to keep it
> current in the docs, and a secondary web site was suggested for the
> list.
So, like www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs/replication? That would work.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
-
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > It isn't designed for that. It is designed for people to understand
> > what they want, and then they can look around for solutions. I think
> > most agree we don't want a list of solutions in the documentation,
> > though I have a few as examples.
>
> Do the
Bruce,
> It isn't designed for that. It is designed for people to understand
> what they want, and then they can look around for solutions. I think
> most agree we don't want a list of solutions in the documentation,
> though I have a few as examples.
Do they? I've seen no discussion of the
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > > > ftp://momjian.us/pub/postgresql/mypatches/replication
>
> I'm still not seeing anything in this patch that tells users where they can
> get replication solutions for PostgreSQL, either OSS or commercial.
It isn't designed for that. It is designed f
Richard Troy wrote:
>
> > Here is a new replication documentation section I want to add for 8.2:
> >
> > ftp://momjian.us/pub/postgresql/mypatches/replication
> >
>
> ...Read the document, as promissed...
>
> First paragraph, "(fail over)" is inconsistent with title, "failover", as
> are oth
Bruce,
> > > ftp://momjian.us/pub/postgresql/mypatches/replication
I'm still not seeing anything in this patch that tells users where they can
get replication solutions for PostgreSQL, either OSS or commercial.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
--
Alexey Klyukin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A typo:
> ("a write to any server has to be _propogated_")
> s/propogated/propagated
Thanks, fixed.
---
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Here is a new replication documentation section I want t
> Here is a new replication documentation section I want to add for 8.2:
>
> ftp://momjian.us/pub/postgresql/mypatches/replication
>
...Read the document, as promissed...
First paragraph, "(fail over)" is inconsistent with title, "failover", as
are other spots throughout the document. The wh
Hi Hannu, everyone,
I apologize for not having read the document in question - will do
shortly. My comments are brought about by the dialogue I read on list this
morning...
> > Here is a new replication documentation section I want to add for 8.2:
> >
> > ftp://momjian.us/pub/postgresql/mypa
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:16 PM
> > > > To: Hannu Krosing
> > > > Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation; PostgreSQL-development
> > > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > O
half Of Bruce Momjian
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:16 PM
> > > To: Hannu Krosing
> > > Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation; PostgreSQL-development
> > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
> > >
> > >
> >
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
>> I have updated the text. Please let me know what else I should change.
>> I am unsure if I should be mentioning commercial PostgreSQL products in
>> our documentation.
>
> I think you should mention the postgresql-only ones, but just briefly with a
> link. Bizg
Bruce,
> I have updated the text. Please let me know what else I should change.
> I am unsure if I should be mentioning commercial PostgreSQL products in
> our documentation.
I think you should mention the postgresql-only ones, but just briefly with a
link. Bizgres MPP, ExtenDB, uni/cluster, a
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:16 PM
> > To: Hannu Krosing
> > Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation; PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
> >
> >
> > OK, I ha
Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Looking at that, I'm a) missing PgCluster and b) arguing that we have to
> admit that we simply can not 'list .. replication solutions ... and how
> to get them' because all of the solutions mentioned need quite some
> knowledge and require a more or less complex ins
I have updated the text. Please let me know what else I should change.
I am unsure if I should be mentioning commercial PostgreSQL products in
our documentation.
---
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> ?hel kenal p?eval, T, 2006-10-24
Bruce,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:16 PM
> To: Hannu Krosing
> Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication d
OK, I have updated the URL. Please let me know how you like it.
---
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> ?hel kenal p?eval, T, 2006-10-24 kell 00:20, kirjutas Bruce Momjian:
> > Here is a new replication documentation section I want to a
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:39:34PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Query Broadcast Replication
> ---
>
> This involves sending write queries to multiple servers. Read-only
> queries can be sent to a single server because there is no need for all
> servers to process it. Th
Hello Josh,
Josh Berkus wrote:
Hmmm ... while the primer on different types of replication is fine, I
think what users were really looking for is a listing of the different
replication solutions which are available for PostgreSQL and how to get
them.
Well, let's see what we have:
* Shared D
Bruce,
> Here is my first draft of a new replication section for our
> documentation. I am looking for any comments.
Hmmm ... while the primer on different types of replication is fine, I
think what users were really looking for is a listing of the different
replication solutions which are ava
Hannu Krosing wrote:
I think the "official" term for this kind of "replication" is
Shared-Nothing Clustering.
Well, that's just another distinction for clusters. Most of the time
it's between Shared-Disk vs. Shared-Nothing. You could also see the very
Big Irons as a Shared-Everything Cluster.
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 2006-10-24 kell 00:20, kirjutas Bruce Momjian:
> Here is a new replication documentation section I want to add for 8.2:
>
> ftp://momjian.us/pub/postgresql/mypatches/replication
This is how data partitioning is currently described there
> Data Partitioning
> -
31 matches
Mail list logo
