I said last week:
> Waiting on Author: 1
> Needs Review: 10
> Ready for Committer: 7
Now there are only 9 patches "Ready for committer". All other patches
have either been moved to the next commitfest, or returned with
feedback.
So we've made some progress, but we need a final push from committ
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> * tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples
> Greg Stark signed up for this
I'll commit this later this week. I looked at it briefly at the
conference but I think it actually does need some minor tweaks.
> * Trim trailing NULL columns
> J
The September 2012 commitfest has been running now for six weeks, and
we've been making some progress. That stalled a bit last week due to
the European conference; hopefully there are now some renewed energies
to let us finish it up soon.
One thing I do *not* want to do is send many patches to th
Thursday, October 18, 2012 7:55 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > For the Patch, Trim trailing NULL columns, I have provided the
> performance
> > data required
> > and completed the review. There are only few review comments which can
> be
> > addressed.
> > So is it possible t
Amit Kapila wrote:
> For the Patch, Trim trailing NULL columns, I have provided the performance
> data required
> and completed the review. There are only few review comments which can be
> addressed.
> So is it possible that I complete them and mark it as "Ready For Committer"
> or what else can
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 9:38 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> A week ago, I wrote:
>
> > Some numbers: we got 65 patches this time, of which we rejected 4 and
> > returned 3 with feedback. 14 patches have already been committed, and
> > 13 are waiting on their respective authors. 25 patches nee
A week ago, I wrote:
> Some numbers: we got 65 patches this time, of which we rejected 4 and
> returned 3 with feedback. 14 patches have already been committed, and
> 13 are waiting on their respective authors. 25 patches need review, and
> 6 are said to be ready for committers.
A week later, n
On 12 October 2012 20:07, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On 11 October 2012 20:30, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I have a quietish few days starting on Saturday, will be looking at this
then.
On 10/12/2012 03:07 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 11 October 2012 20:30, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I have a quietish few days starting on Saturday, will be looking at this
then. Is it only the W
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 11 October 2012 20:30, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> I have a quietish few days starting on Saturday, will be looking at this
>>> then. Is it only the Windows aspect that needs reviewing?
On 11 October 2012 20:30, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I have a quietish few days starting on Saturday, will be looking at this
>> then. Is it only the Windows aspect that needs reviewing? Are we more or
>> less happy with the rest?
>
> I think th
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I have a quietish few days starting on Saturday, will be looking at this
> then. Is it only the Windows aspect that needs reviewing? Are we more or
> less happy with the rest?
I think the Windows issues were the biggest thing, but I suspect
On 10/11/2012 02:22 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera writes:
IIRC, the parallel pg_dump one is said to need review by a Windows
expert, which is not me, so I've not looked at it.
Andrew? Magnus?
There's, unfor
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera writes:
>> IIRC, the parallel pg_dump one is said to need review by a Windows
>> expert, which is not me, so I've not looked at it.
>
> Andrew? Magnus?
There's, unfortunately, not a chance I'll have a tim
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:19:17PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Many of those patches waiting on authors have been in such state for a
> rather long time. I feel inclined to mark them "returned with
> feedback", and have them posted again for the next commitfest.
+1
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
>> * Move postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink
> I'm not sure if the validator change is noncontroversial or not ---
> I seem to recall that Peter and I had different opinions about how to do
> that.
On rechecking the archives, it looks like Peter now agrees wit
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > The commitfest currently in progress seems to have ground to a halt.
>
> Indeed :-(. I plead guilty as much as anybody else to not making it
> a high priority. But do we even have anyone acting as commitfest
> manager? Periodic nagging seems to be n
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> The commitfest currently in progress seems to have ground to a halt.
Indeed :-(. I plead guilty as much as anybody else to not making it
a high priority. But do we even have anyone acting as commitfest
manager? Periodic nagging seems to be necessary to move things forw
18 matches
Mail list logo
