On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:37:58AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
This also brings up the thought that if we do want to use pgfoundry.org,
we'd better register pgfoundry.net and pgfoundry.com before someone
else does.
And .info? And .biz? And whatever other unrestricted nonsense
things there are
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
Just to speak up (as an avid lurker), I agree with Jeroen that this
distinction is quite subtle and may cause confusion. Some may even
expect the two to resolve to the same site, as a lot of popular sites
own .com/.net/.org, all resolving to the same site.
Speaking of
However, some of the porting team felt that it would be
confusing for people
who typed in www.postgresql.net to be presented with the
GForge interface,
and suggested that we use the domain after what we'll be
calling the new
Tool, namely pgFoundry, thus putting stuff at
Josh Berkus wrote:
Folks,
As we discussed a couple weeks ago, Marc, Andrew, Tim Perdue, Chris Ryan and I
are testing implementing GForge in place of GBorg for associated projects for
PostgreSQL.
One thing which was suggested initially was that this new project hosting site
be at
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 March 2004 13:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Isn't gforge a pgsql related project itself?
So I'd suggest
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 02:42:47PM -, Dave Page wrote:
We need some distinction between the core project sites and other
project sites - istm that a different domain is the only way to do that.
Okay, then how about postgres-extra.net, or forpostgres.net?
Saying Postgres instead of
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 March 2004 13:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Isn't gforge a pgsql related project itself
Jeroen T. Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 02:42:47PM -, Dave Page wrote:
We need some distinction between the core project sites and other
project sites - istm that a different domain is the only way to do that.
Okay, then how about postgres-extra.net, or
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:37:58AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Well, if you want to think along those lines, I believe that we (PGDG)
currently hold these domain names:
[...]
postgres.org
This is the one I was silently rooting for, but figured was too good to
be true.
You could make a
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Isn't gforge a pgsql related project itself?
So I'd suggest:
www.postgresql.org http://www.postgresql.org- main PostgreSQL
site
gforge.postgresql.org - gforge interface site
Robert,
maybe pgsqlfoundry is a better compromise?
No, too long.People'd end up calling it pgFoundry anyway.
Besides, Gavin Roy already designed us a nice pgFoundry logo. ;-)
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end of
Tom Lane wrote:
Well, if you want to think along those lines, I believe that we (PGDG)
currently hold these domain names:
postgresql.org
postgresql.com
postgresql.net
postgres.org
postgres.com
It looks like some domain squatter has his tentacles on
David Garamond [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, we're targetting the developers right? Please do not consider
ourselves as being too stupid to differentiate between postgresql.org and
postgresql.net...
I can never remember whether the current site is postgresql.{com,org,net} even
now. Making
Joe,
Looks like he hasn't been squatting all that long:
Domain Name: POSTGRES.NET
Created on..: Wed, Aug 07, 2002
Expires on..: Sat, Aug 07, 2004
Record last updated on..: Fri, Oct 31, 2003
Also note the expiration date. Maybe we can
Josh Berkus wrote:
Looks like he hasn't been squatting all that long:
Domain Name: POSTGRES.NET
Created on..: Wed, Aug 07, 2002
Expires on..: Sat, Aug 07, 2004
Record last updated on..: Fri, Oct 31, 2003
Also note the expiration date. Maybe we can
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Greg Stark wrote:
I would say follow the same model as modules.apache.org, pear.php.net,
etc.
note that having projects.postgresql.org is cool ... its just the projects
subpages that I'm objecting too ...
the easiest is to have http://projects.postgresql.org point to the
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 03:14:10PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
So far, only 4 people, total, have expressed opinons on the matter. I'm
throwing this on Hackers so that members of projects we will be hosting can
indicate whether they:
A) Favor www.postgresql.net
B) Favor www.pgfoundry.org
Jeroen T. Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 03:14:10PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
A) Favor www.postgresql.net
B) Favor www.pgfoundry.org
C) Don't care as long as the porting is relatively painless.
I'm not crazy about the name pgfoundry, but otherwise I think it's
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:01:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Actually, proposal (A) does provide such a separation: notice that the
projects would go under *.postgresql.net, with the core database remaining
at *.postgresql.org. I am not sure if that will provoke confusion or
not, but I think I
Jeroen T. Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's another idea: couldn't we have a subdomain for the projects, as in
project.forge.postgresql.org? Or would that be too long?
That would be okay with me ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of
Jeroen,
Here's another idea: couldn't we have a subdomain for the projects, as in
project.forge.postgresql.org? Or would that be too long?
Hmmm ... wouldn't that be rather awkward with the projects with longer names?
http://orapgsqlviews.foundry.postgresql.org
That's 39 characters, not
Tom Lane wrote:
Jeroen T. Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 03:14:10PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
A) Favor www.postgresql.net
B) Favor www.pgfoundry.org
C) Don't care as long as the porting is relatively painless.
I'm not crazy about the name
On Mar 12, 2004, at 9:07 AM, Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:01:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Actually, proposal (A) does provide such a separation: notice that the
projects would go under *.postgresql.net, with the core database
remaining
at *.postgresql.org. I am not sure
23 matches
Mail list logo
