On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 06:29:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Incidentally, use of a different SCM system might well make
constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would
create a branch called test-set--mm-dd or some such, make
On Monday 22 August 2005 13:13, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 06:29:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Incidentally, use of a different SCM system might well make
constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would
create
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:28:54PM -0700, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
On Monday 22 August 2005 13:13, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Of course we could use pgbench for this instead of dbt*, but ISTM that
dbt is a better choice since it's useful for a broader set of people.
The downside is it requires
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Incidentally, use of a different SCM system might well make
constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would
create a branch called test-set--mm-dd or some such, make your
changes there, add a test script under some well known
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Incidentally, use of a different SCM system might well make
constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would
create a branch called test-set--mm-dd or some such, make your
changes there, add a test script
