On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Amit Langote
wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look. Hm, I think the second part seems to be
> needless duplication. So, I changed it to match using TailMatches2("FOR",
> "VALUES") and kept just one instance of it. The first part is matching
> and completing two diff
On 2017/02/20 1:22, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Amit Langote
> wrote:
>> Also attaching 0002 (unchanged) for tab-completion support for the new
>> partitioning syntax.
>
> At one point you have this:
>
> +/* Limited completion support for partition bound specificati
