[HACKERS] current build fail

2002-09-02 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
I see: /usr/jakarta-ant-1.4.1/bin/ant -buildfile ./build.xml all \ -Dmajor=7 -Dminor=3 -Dfullversion=7.3devel -Ddef_pgport=5432 -Denable_debug=yes Buildfile: ./build.xml BUILD FAILED /usr/local/src/pgsql/current/pgsql/src/interfaces/jdbc/./build.xml:51: Class org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.co

Re: [HACKERS] current build fail

2002-09-02 Thread Thomas O'Dowd
Yeah, it seems to require Ant 1.5 now. This should probably go in the configure script, ie a test for Ant 1.5 if java enabled? Tom. On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 16:30, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > I see: > > /usr/jakarta-ant-1.4.1/bin/ant -buildfile ./build.xml all \ > -Dmajor=7 -Dminor=3 -Dfullversion=7.3

Re: [HACKERS] current build fail

2002-09-02 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> Yeah, it seems to require Ant 1.5 now. Thanks I got Ant 1.5 and now PostgreSQL builds fine. > This should probably go in the > configure script, ie a test for Ant 1.5 if java enabled? Sounds nice idea. -- Tatsuo Ishii ---(end of broadcast)--- T

Re: [HACKERS] contrib/ intarray, ltree, intagg broken(?) by array

2002-09-02 Thread Oleg Bartunov
We'll be back to work next week and look into code. Oleg On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Can someone address the intagg issue here, or is the code OK? > > --- > > Tom Lane wrote: > > Joe Conway and I hav

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch stop words

2002-09-02 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Christopher, current implementation is ugly, we still didn't move functionality from OpenFTS to tsearch. Look at makedict subdirectory to create your custom dictionary. Default list is in engstoptree[] defined in dic/porter_english.dct On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > How do

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch stop words

2002-09-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Ummm...I totally don't understand the format of that array at all! static ESWNODE engstoptree[] = { {'m',L,9,126}, {'d',L,4,71}, {'b',L,2,40}, {'a',F,0,14}, {'c',0,0,62}, {'f',L,2,79}, {'e',0,0,75}, {'h',0,1,90}, {'i',F,0,108

Re: [HACKERS] BETWEEN SYMMERIC

2002-09-02 Thread Rod Taylor
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 02:36, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Whatver happened to Rod's work on the BETWEEN command? I remember he got to > the stage of realising a lot of execetor changes had to be made...? I've not had time to implement the optimizer portion. ---(end

Re: [HACKERS] [7.3-devl] converision test fails

2002-09-02 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> I'm still getting conversion test failures on RH 7.2, 7.3, and Null beta. > > My confiugre arguments are: > > ./configure --prefix=/opt/postgresql --with-java --with-python --with-openssl >--enable-syslog --enable-debug --enable-cassert > --enable-depend You need not to specify --enable-sys

[HACKERS] serial datatype changes for v7.3?

2002-09-02 Thread Chris
Hi, I'm playing around with the CVS version and noticed a change from 7.2 in regards to serial datatypes - they no longer automatically have an index. Is this a deliberate thing? I did a search in the archives but didn't come across mention of the change. A pointer to discussion on this would

Re: [HACKERS] contrib/ intarray, ltree, intagg broken(?) by array changes

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have already received a patch that modifies the regression tests and it seems things are working. However, it would be good for you to take a look. Fortunately, that can be done anytime during beta. Thanks. --- Oleg Bar

Re: [HACKERS] current build fail

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > Yeah, it seems to require Ant 1.5 now. > > Thanks I got Ant 1.5 and now PostgreSQL builds fine. > > > This should probably go in the > > configure script, ie a test for Ant 1.5 if java enabled? > > Sounds nice idea. Yes, I am going to add a test for >= Ant 1.5 to config

Re: [HACKERS] serial datatype changes for v7.3?

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm playing around with the CVS version and noticed a change from 7.2 in > regards to serial datatypes - they no longer automatically have an > index. Is this a deliberate thing? Yes. The release notes mention: SERIAL no longer implies UNIQUE; specify expli

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You can probably nail some TODOs: > * Allow autocommit so always in a transaction block This isn't really done; the backend side is probably okay, but we have a ton of client-side code that will malfunction if you try to run it in autocommi

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Serguei A. Mokhov
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 10:33:49 -0400 > From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > PostgreSQL-development <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] I am done > > "C

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane dijo: > "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > You can probably nail some TODOs: > > o -Cluster all tables at once using pg_index.indisclustered set during > previous CLUSTER > > This is not done, unless we are going to accept Alvaro's last-minute >

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > You can probably nail some TODOs: > > > * Allow autocommit so always in a transaction block > > This isn't really done; the backend side is probably okay, but we have > a ton of client-side code that will malfunction if

Re: [HACKERS] serial datatype changes for v7.3?

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm playing around with the CVS version and noticed a change from 7.2 in > > regards to serial datatypes - they no longer automatically have an > > index. Is this a deliberate thing? > > Yes. The release notes mention: > > SERIAL no long

Re: [HACKERS] [7.3-devl] converision test fails

2002-09-02 Thread Gordon Runkle
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 09:35, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > You need not to specify --enable-syslog in 7.3 BTW. OK, thanks. > This happens because the path to shared objs are defined at the > compile time. I think you don't get the failure once you install > PostgreSQL. However it's not convenience since

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Serguei A. Mokhov wrote: > > > On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 10:33:49 -0400 > > From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > PostgreSQL-development <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch stop words

2002-09-02 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Ummm...I totally don't understand the format of that array at all! stop words in suffix tree :) I've told it's default list of stop words and it's certainly far from perfect. Please find attached file with stop words we used (I just found on m

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> This isn't really done; the backend side is probably okay, but we have >> a ton of client-side code that will malfunction if you try to run it in >> autocommit-off state. > My feeling is that we have to fix this during beta. No we do

Re: [HACKERS] current build fail

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied to test for Ant >= 1.5. Autconf run. --- Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > > Yeah, it seems to require Ant 1.5 now. > > > > Thanks I got Ant 1.5 and now PostgreSQL builds fine. > > > > > This s

Re: [HACKERS] serial datatype changes for v7.3?

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Yes. The release notes mention: >> SERIAL no longer implies UNIQUE; specify explicitly if index is wanted > What was the logic for this change? See the thread back around 17 Aug: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-08/

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> This isn't really done; the backend side is probably okay, but we have > >> a ton of client-side code that will malfunction if you try to run it in > >> autocommit-off state. > > > My feeling is that we have to f

Re: [HACKERS] serial datatype changes for v7.3?

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, we just need to make that clear in the release notes. I had forgotten about the change. --- Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Yes. The release notes mention: > >> SER

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I don't think it *can* be fixed in a reasonable fashion until we have >> notification to the client side about what the backend's transaction >> state is; which is one of the protocol-change items for 7.4. > Why can't we just turn on

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Rod Taylor
> > * Have SERIAL generate non-colliding sequence names when we have > > auto-destruction > > > > They should be pretty well non-colliding now. What's the gripe exactly? > > The issue was that when there were name collisions, we threw an error > instead of trying other sequence names. We h

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I don't think it *can* be fixed in a reasonable fashion until we have > >> notification to the client side about what the backend's transaction > >> state is; which is one of the protocol-change items for 7.4. >

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src/include/port hpux.h

2002-09-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: > What I'm currently thinking we should do is default largefile support to > off in HPUX < 11.0; is there a convenient way to accomplish that in > autoconf? Something like this maybe (before AC_SYS_LARGEFILE): case $host_os in hpuxZYX*) if test "${enable_largefile+set}" != set;

[HACKERS] reindex of toast tables

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom, when you loosened the restriction on reindexing toast tables, did you continue to restrict indexing of system tables to the superuser? Is that required? -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your lif

Re: [HACKERS] reindex of toast tables

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom, when you loosened the restriction on reindexing toast tables, did > you continue to restrict indexing of system tables to the superuser? Is > that required? Hm. Now that I look at it, the forms REINDEX TABLE and REINDEX INDEX don't seem to have a

Re: [HACKERS] reindex of toast tables

2002-09-02 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane dijo: > Hm. Now that I look at it, the forms REINDEX TABLE and REINDEX INDEX > don't seem to have any permissions checks at all :-(. One would think > that they need to require ownership rights on the target table. They are done in tcop/utility.c AFAICS. -- Alvaro Herrera () "Cuand

Re: [HACKERS] Impending freeze

2002-09-02 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > So my take is that anything that needs initdb doesn't get in after > beta1, unless it's a "must fix" bug. What have we got in the queue > that would require system catalog changes? Agreed, but, have we ever done such when it *wasn't* required? I know in th

[HACKERS] Future of --enable-recode?

2002-09-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Now that the "multibyte"-based character set recoding is a fixed part of the feature set, is there any need to keep the "Cyrillic" recode support? -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extens

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump compatibility between 7.3 and 7.2?

2002-09-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Mario Weilguni writes: > Timestamps in 7.2.x are this format: 2002-07-04 15:19:11.363562+02 > 7.3 expects a timestamp per default in this format: 2002-09-02 08:51:27,223455+02 If you're not running the reallly latest 7.3 tip, update and try again. Something related to this was fixed recently. -

[HACKERS] Gettext and INT64_FORMAT

2002-09-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Gettext cannot handle compile-time string concatenation with macros. This is a made-up example: printf(gettext("now at file position " INT64_FORMAT), (int64) offset); At the time when the message catalogs are extracted, INT64_FORMAT is unknown. The solution in the Gettext manual is to rewr

Re: [HACKERS] DNS change for candle.pha.pa.us

2002-09-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have moved my main computer to my new house. The DNS is still being > updated, but the new IP address is: > > 207.106.42.251 > > Vince, would you update the developer's page and change > 'candle.pha.pa.us' to this fixed IP address. It may take

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: > There are some things we can tweak to make the clients less broken than > they are now --- for instance, all of libpq's startup-time SET commands > could be switched to "BEGIN; SET ...; COMMIT;" which will work the same > with or without autocommit --- but I don't think we can

[HACKERS] Docs for v7.3 ...

2002-09-02 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Just a quick one before I package up the wrong thing ... where should I be pulling docs from? :) ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL P

Re: [HACKERS] reindex of toast tables

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane dijo: >> Hm. Now that I look at it, the forms REINDEX TABLE and REINDEX INDEX >> don't seem to have any permissions checks at all :-(. One would think >> that they need to require ownership rights on the target table. > They are done in tco

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Perhaps one should consider removing the autocommit option. It's no use > if it's there but everything breaks when you turn it on. As far as I'm concerned, it's in there for one reason only (as far as 7.3 goes): so that we can run the NIST SQL compl

Re: [HACKERS] Future of --enable-recode?

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now that the "multibyte"-based character set recoding is a fixed part of > the feature set, is there any need to keep the "Cyrillic" recode support? It's probably not worth maintaining anymore ... regards, tom lane -

Re: [ODBC] [HACKERS] ODBC Driver moved to GBorg ...

2002-09-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > This is all in Vince's area ... You're right. You don't see 'em. > > > On 23 Aug 2002, Greg Copeland wrote: > > > I must be blind. I don't see links to gborg anywhere on the developer > > or main site web pages. Perhaps more obvious a sister s

Re: [ODBC] [HACKERS] ODBC Driver moved to GBorg ...

2002-09-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > This is all in Vince's area ... Correction. You're not looking, it's in the users lounge. We've covered the button thing already. > > > On 23 Aug 2002, Greg Copeland wrote: > > > I must be blind. I don't see links to gborg anywhere on the deve

Re: [HACKERS] DNS change for candle.pha.pa.us

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I have moved my main computer to my new house. The DNS is still being > > updated, but the new IP address is: > > > > 207.106.42.251 > > > > Vince, would you update the developer's page and change > > 'candle.pha.pa.us'

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> o -ALTER TABLE ADD PRIMARY KEY (Tom) > o -ALTER TABLE ADD UNIQUE (Tom) > > AFAIR, I didn't do either of those; I think Chris K-L gets the credit. Actually, I did ADD UNIQUE originally after lots of coding and then you went and made it work by changing a couple of lines in the gramma

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > o -ALTER TABLE ADD PRIMARY KEY (Tom) > > o -ALTER TABLE ADD UNIQUE (Tom) > > > > AFAIR, I didn't do either of those; I think Chris K-L gets the credit. > > Actually, I did ADD UNIQUE originally after lots of coding and then you went > and made it work by

[HACKERS] Linux Journal Editors Choice Awards

2002-09-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Looks like we got an honourable mention *sigh*: Server Appliance: SnapGear for Lite/Lite+ SOHO Firewall/VPN Client Honorable Mention: Sun Microsystems for Cobalt Qube Security Tool: GPG Web Server: IBM for xSeries Honorable Mention: Sun Microsystems for Cobalt RaQ XRT Enterprise Application Serve

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Gavin Sherry
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >> Oh, didn't you put in that patch to provide a GUC level control? > > > > > Yes, but what level do you set it at to turn it off? > > > > FATAL? PANIC? > > He doesn't support those levels: > > test=> set log_min_error_statement = fata

[HACKERS] 7.3 gotchas for applications and client libraries

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce suggested that we need a porting guide to help people look for application and client-library code that will be broken by the changes in PG 7.3. Here is a first cut at documenting the issues. Comments welcome --- in particular, what have I missed? regards, tom lane

Re: [HACKERS] Linux Journal Editors Choice Awards

2002-09-02 Thread Gavin Sherry
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Database: MySQL Honorable Mention: PostgresSQL Nothing wrong with that. From your list it seemed that in the categories where there were competing open source and open source/commercial backed software then the latter seemed to win over. Thi

Re: [HACKERS] I am done

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Gavin Sherry wrote: > Okay, my bad. From my reading of the email exchange, I thought people > wanted this on -- always. The best solution for this, in my opinion, is to > have a magic value "off" which the error code lookup translates to some > number > PANIC. What do people think? I thought we

Re: [HACKERS] Linux Journal Editors Choice Awards

2002-09-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > Database: MySQL Honorable Mention: PostgresSQL > > Nothing wrong with that. From your list it seemed that in the categories > where there were competing open source and open source/commercial backed > software then the latter seemed to win

Re: [HACKERS] Linux Journal Editors Choice Awards

2002-09-02 Thread Gavin Sherry
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > database market now includes SapDB for crying out loud - how can MySQL (and > even postgres really) compete with that? And what about Firebird? I think And berkeley db. *Easily* the most widely used open source database and the most profitab

Re: [HACKERS] Linux Journal Editors Choice Awards

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > > > Database: MySQL Honorable Mention: PostgresSQL > > > > Nothing wrong with that. From your list it seemed that in the categories > > where there were competing open source and open source/commercial back

Re: [HACKERS] Linux Journal Editors Choice Awards

2002-09-02 Thread Gerhard Häring
* Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-03 10:17 +0800]: > > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > > > Database: MySQL Honorable Mention: PostgresSQL > > > > Nothing wrong with that. From your list it seemed that in the categories > > where there were competing op

Re: [HACKERS] DNS change for candle.pha.pa.us

2002-09-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > I have moved my main computer to my new house. The DNS is still being > > > updated, but the new IP address is: > > > > > > 207.106.42.251 > > > > > > Vince, would you upda

Re: [HACKERS] DNS change for candle.pha.pa.us

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > I have moved my main computer to my new house. The DNS is still being > > > > updated, but the new IP address is: > > > > > > > > 2

Re: [HACKERS] Linux Journal Editors Choice Awards

2002-09-02 Thread Thomas Lockhart
Actually, Linux Journal (and their editors) are fans of PostgreSQL. This year, MySQL may actually have clued in to transactions and a few other big database features. I don't know that they actually *have* these features polished up, but LJ is giving them credit for trying... -

Re: [HACKERS] DNS change for candle.pha.pa.us

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: > No, that's OK. I have things pointing to my machine like the open > patches list and stuff. It turns out that my ISP is all I need to > change, and .US can do it whenever they get to it. I thought I was more > vulnerable than I thought. Actually, now that I think of it,

Re: [HACKERS] Linux Journal Editors Choice Awards

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Thomas Lockhart wrote: > Actually, Linux Journal (and their editors) are fans of PostgreSQL. > > This year, MySQL may actually have clued in to transactions and a few > other big database features. I don't know that they actually *have* > these features polished up, but LJ is giving them credit f

Re: [HACKERS] Linux Journal Editors Choice Awards

2002-09-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> Actually, Linux Journal (and their editors) are fans of PostgreSQL. > > This year, MySQL may actually have clued in to transactions and a few > other big database features. I don't know that they actually *have* > these features polished up, but LJ is giving them credit for trying... It still d

[HACKERS] Another use of check (a is not null)

2002-09-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
If we got rid of the other NOT NULL != CHECK (a IS NOT NULL) instance, may as well get rid of the one on this page: http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-createdomain.html Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscrib

[HACKERS] /contrib port modules

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Marc, do you want to start trimming /contrib? I know the MySQL and Oracle tools each have their own websites. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + C

[HACKERS] HISTORY file

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
I am still working on the 7.3 HISTORY file. I have extracted the items, but I have to worksmith them and write an introduction. It is midnight here now. I don't think I can finish before ~3am and at that point, I am not sure I will know what I am writing. Basically, one day of feature freeze w

Re: [HACKERS] HISTORY file

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know of any other items holding up the packaging. Gotta brand the thing as 7.3beta1 not 7.3devel, no? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked ou

Re: [HACKERS] HISTORY file

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't know of any other items holding up the packaging. > > Gotta brand the thing as 7.3beta1 not 7.3devel, no? Yes, I haven't gotten to the release checklist yet. Let's delay a day. I have a 17k line log file down to 3.5k lines

Re: [HACKERS] HISTORY file

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, I haven't gotten to the release checklist yet. Let's delay a day. Or at least late in the day tomorrow. I have some loose ends to clean up yet as well, but I'm beat and am going to bed. But I assume we are now officially in feature freeze, right

Re: [HACKERS] Linux Journal Editors Choice Awards

2002-09-02 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
Le Mardi 3 Septembre 2002 04:28, Gerhard Häring a écrit : > PostgreSQL will have a > native win32 port, Just out of interest, what is the advancement of the Windows port. Best regards, Jean-Michel ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading

[HACKERS] findoidjoins

2002-09-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
findoidjoins doens't seem to compile: gmake[1]: Entering directory `/home/chriskl/pgsql-head/contrib/findoidjoins' gcc -pipe -O -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I../../sr c/interfaces/libpgeasy -I../../src/interfaces/libpq -I. -I../../src/include -c -o findoidjoins.o findo

Re: [HACKERS] findoidjoins

2002-09-02 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Christopher Kings-Lynne dijo: > findoidjoins doens't seem to compile: > > gmake[1]: Entering directory `/home/chriskl/pgsql-head/contrib/findoidjoins' > gcc -pipe -O -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I../../sr > c/interfaces/libpgeasy -I../../src/interfaces/libpq -I. -I../..

[HACKERS] possible vacuum improvement?

2002-09-02 Thread Mario Weilguni
I know everyone is busy with the 7.3beta, but maybe this is something to think of before releasing the beta. Currently VACUUM will vacuum every table, but sometimes it's desireable to leave tables untouched because the're mostly static or protocol tables. In my case this would be the pg_largeobj

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump compatibility between 7.3 and 7.2?

2002-09-02 Thread Mario Weilguni
Am Dienstag, 3. September 2002 00:26 schrieb Peter Eisentraut: > Mario Weilguni writes: > > Timestamps in 7.2.x are this format: 2002-07-04 15:19:11.363562+02 > > 7.3 expects a timestamp per default in this format: 2002-09-02 > > 08:51:27,223455+02 > > If you're not running the reallly latest 7.3

Re: [HACKERS] possible vacuum improvement?

2002-09-02 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On 3 Sep 2002 at 8:55, Mario Weilguni wrote: > I know everyone is busy with the 7.3beta, but maybe this is something to think of >before releasing the beta. Currently VACUUM will vacuum every table, but sometimes > it's desireable to leave tables untouched because the're mostly static or protoco

Re: [HACKERS] possible vacuum improvement?

2002-09-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> Personally I would prefer to have a trigger on a metadata table > where I could > trigger vacuuming a particular table each n number of > transactions(Oh it would > be great if that vacuum runs in background not blocking meta data > table.. just > a wishlist...). Can anybody tell me which table