2009/5/7 Dickson S. Guedes lis...@guedesoft.net:
Em Qui, 2009-05-07 às 10:11 +0300, Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
How about you
Jaime Casanova jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
i can find value for FORCE QUOTE * but what's
the use case for FORCE NOT NULL?
NULLs are not quoted (to be ,, ) because empty strings are written as .
It comes from original implementation and not from my patch.
I think we don't need to
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 7:43 PM
To: Andrew Dunstan
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading our minimum required flex version
is an updated version of patch; just add documenation
to copy.sgml.
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
force_quote_all-20090714.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:39 AM, higeponhige...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
Here is a patch for pg_dump Commenting on a composite-type column.
This patch is for Todo item named Add dumping of comments on index
columns and composite type columns.
this one looks good to me, the only adjust i made to
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 09:12:21 Jaime Casanova wrote:
2009/5/7 Dickson S. Guedes lis...@guedesoft.net:
Em Qui, 2009-05-07 às 10:11 +0300, Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm
Chuck McDevitt wrote:
Flex 2.5.33 and bison 2.3 are available from mingw for windows.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/
Since mingw programs don't need Cygwin installed, these should probably be OK
for most Windows people.
But if really needed, flex 2.5.33 could be ported (m4
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Itagaki
Takahiroitagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Jaime Casanova jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
i can find value for FORCE QUOTE * but what's
the use case for FORCE NOT NULL?
Oh, sorry. I misread your mail.
The patch adds * options FORCE QUOTE
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 10:16 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Implementing index-only scans requires a few changes:
I would like to see a clear exposition of the use cases and an an
analysis of the costs and benefits of doing this. It sounds cool, but I
want to know it
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 10:16 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Implementing index-only scans requires a few changes:
I would like to see a clear exposition of the use cases and an an
analysis of the costs and benefits of doing this. It sounds cool, but I
want to know it
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 11:23 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
The single SQL example mentioned already has at least two mechanisms for
improving performance of that type of query. We probably don't need
another, or at least we need a good analysis of why.
Well, another class of queries
I already posted the patch to satisfy quals using data from index
yesterday
(http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4a5b5386.3070...@enterprisedb.com),
but here's some more thoughts about the patch:
1, The patch adds a flag to IndexScanDesc (needIndexTuple) that you can
set to request the
(submitting review slightly earlier than start of commitfest)
Kedar,
Thank you very much for the patch. Well done for getting to this stage.
There is definitely much support for your work.
My thoughts after initial review are fairly wide ranging. Overall, the
patch is not ready/close to commit
is platform-independent.
A new feature compared with previous patch is function
pgstat_register_condition(condition, name).
We can add user-defined conditions in extended modules.
Comments welcome.
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
profiler-20090714.gz
Description
Hello,
This patch using VirtualAlloc()/VirtualFree() to avoid failing in
reattach to shared memory.
Can this be added to CommitFest ?
Recent threads in pgsql-bugs are
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-07/msg00036.php
This fix is almost same as previous patch. debug code is
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Noah Mischn...@leadboat.com wrote:
z
Describing in those terms illuminates much. While the concepts do suggest 2^N
worst-case planning cost, my artificial test case showed a rigid 4^N pattern;
what could explain that?
Isn`t that just so that the planner has to
On Monday 13 July 2009 16:38:18 Bruce Momjian wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Even if we don't solve the visibility
map problem, just allowing the executor to evaluate quals that are not
directly indexable using data from the index, would be useful. For
example, SELECT * FROM foo WHERE
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:22 AM, Tsutomu Yamadatsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
Hello,
This patch using VirtualAlloc()/VirtualFree() to avoid failing in
reattach to shared memory.
Can this be added to CommitFest ?
Patches for CommitFest should be added here:
bruce wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tilmann Singer wrote:
However, all of the sequences were at the initial values and not
bumped up to the last used value as I would have expected. The first
nextval call on any sequence in the migrated 8.4 database
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Did we change sequence table format from
8.3 to 8.4?
Oh, yes we did: we added a start_value column. So this is going to take
more work than that :-(
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Something is certainly wrong. Did we change sequence table format from
8.3 to 8.4?
8.3 does not have start_value.
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
This patch using VirtualAlloc()/VirtualFree() to avoid failing in
reattach to shared memory.
Can this be added to CommitFest ?
Since this fixes a very annoying bug present in older versions, I think
this should be backpatched all the way back to 8.2.
Some notes about
Simon,
Simon Riggs escribió:
Kedar,
Thank you very much for the patch. Well done for getting to this stage.
There is definitely much support for your work.
Thanks for the thorough review. Please when you add a comment to the
commitfest app, make sure you specify the message-id where you
Updated patch attached.
Changes:
* Added syntax support:
CREATE INDEX foo_idx ON foo ... (a CONSTRAINT =, b CONSTRAINT );
* More aggressively clear the shared memory entries to avoid
unnecessary checks
* Code cleanup
TODO:
* When adding constraint to table with data already in it,
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
This patch using VirtualAlloc()/VirtualFree() to avoid failing in
reattach to shared memory.
Since this fixes a very annoying bug present in older versions, I think
this should be backpatched all the way back to 8.2.
Hi there,
attached is our patch for CVS HEAD, which adds prefix support for synonym
dictionary.
Quick example:
cat $SHAREDIR/tsearch_data/synonym_sample.syn
postgrespgsql
postgresql pgsql
postgre pgsql
gogle googl
indices index*
=# create text search dictionary syn(
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
This patch using VirtualAlloc()/VirtualFree() to avoid failing in
reattach to shared memory.
Since this fixes a very annoying bug present in older versions, I think
this should be backpatched all
Jeremy Kerr wrote:
Also, since we don't need to declare variables in the macros, we
can change the code to be implemented as static inlines.
Does this work in compilers other than GCC? I think we use some kludges
to protect against them ... see pg_list.h for the canonical example.
--
Alvaro
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
This patch using VirtualAlloc()/VirtualFree() to avoid failing in
reattach to shared memory.
Can this be added to CommitFest ?
Since this fixes a very annoying bug present in older versions, I think
this should be backpatched all the way back
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Itagaki
Takahiroitagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp wrote:
I updated Sampling profiler patch to be applied to HEAD cleanly.
shouldn't pg_stat_reset() reset these values?
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 07:06:40PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 13:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
It's hard to believe
this sort of case comes up often enough to justify the cycles that would
be expended (on *every* join query) to try to recognize it.
Yeh, damn ORMs seem to
Brendan Jurd wrote:
2009/7/14 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
+1 for redirecting the whole site. I don't think the extra CPU load
of SSL is going to bother anyone for the amount of traffic we're
likely to have on that site. Simplicity is good.
+1 for SSL on all pages from me also.
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Since this fixes a very annoying bug present in older versions, I think
this should be backpatched all the way back to 8.2.
Agreed, but first we need some evidence that it actually fixes the
problem. How can we acquire such
Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
Jaime Casanova jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
i can find value for FORCE QUOTE * but what's
the use case for FORCE NOT NULL?
Oh, sorry. I misread your mail.
The patch adds * options FORCE QUOTE and FORCE NOT NULL, too.
Both of * mean all-columns for
On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 14:14 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
Here is an updated version of this patch which should apply to HEAD,
with updated docs, regression tests, pg_dump and psql \d.
It works well for small numbers of temporary uniqueness violations,
and at least as well (in fact about twice
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Alvaro
Herreraalvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
This patch using VirtualAlloc()/VirtualFree() to avoid failing in
reattach to shared memory.
Since this fixes a very
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Chuck McDevitt wrote:
Flex 2.5.33 and bison 2.3 are available from mingw for windows.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/
Since mingw programs don't need Cygwin installed, these should
probably be OK for most Windows people.
But if really needed, flex
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
What I have done is built a version of flex 2.5.35 with Cygwin, and
bundled the .exe with the Cygwin DLL (the only other thing it should
need, for our purposes) in a zip file. It can currently be fetched from
Now I'm back where I can go look at the source code :-)
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Jaime Casanova [mailto:jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 8:40 PM
To: Mischa Sandberg
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Index-only
== Announcing ==
Announce to:
* PostgreSQL News
* pgsql-hackers
* pgsql-general(?)
* pgsql-packagers
Also pgsql-announce, no?
I'm happy to write announcements. I'm also happy to give someone else
some practice ... I'll see if anyone is interested on -advocacy.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL
On Tuesday, July 14, 2009, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
This patch using VirtualAlloc()/VirtualFree() to avoid failing in
reattach to shared memory.
Since this fixes a very
Jaime Casanova wrote:
- identify some people with the problem and talk to them for: 1) get a
way to reproduce the error (a lot dificult, IIRC we try a few times i
fail to fail) or 2) get their support for test
For back-patching, we'd be maybe even more interested in getting people
who *don't*
On 7/13/09 12:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
* Release notes [Note: We'll have to work out exactly how to do this one as we
go.]
I am not planning to assist with this item for alpha releases.
Anyone want to volunteer to organize the alpha release notes? This
seems
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:56:48AM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 14:14 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
Here is an updated version of this patch which should apply to HEAD,
with updated docs, regression tests, pg_dump and psql \d.
It works well for small numbers of temporary
Fujii Masao wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Fujii Masaomasao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch no longer applies cleanly. Can you rebase and resubmit it
for the upcoming CommitFest? It might also be good to go through and
clean up the various places where you have trailing whitespace
Jeff Davis wrote:
The only problem there is telling the btree AM whether or not to do the
insert or not (i.e. fake versus real insert). Perhaps you can just do
that with careful use of a global variable?
Sure, all of this is a little ugly, but we've already acknowledged that
there is some
Jamie Fox wrote:
Here's what I have found that got broken during pg_migrate: In two side by
side databases (an 8.3.7 copy and 8.4.0 migrated with pg_migrator) the
pg_largeobject table has the same number of rows. However, in the 8.4
database any select for an loid in pg_largeobject returns
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Jamie Fox wrote:
I can also see that the pg_largeobject table is different, in the
pg_restore
version the
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 13:29 -0500, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
I am looking at adding unique support to hash indexes for 8.5 and
they will definitely need to visit the heap.
Have you seen this patch?
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1246840119.19547.126.ca...@jdavis
This patch will
Hi there,
we'd like to introduce filtering dictionaries support for text search
and new contrib module unaccent, which provides useful example of
filtering dictionary. It finally solves the known problem of
incorrect generation of headlines of text with accents.
Also, this module provides
On Jul 14, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc
wrote:
Brendan Jurd wrote:
2009/7/14 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
+1 for redirecting the whole site. I don't think the extra CPU load
of SSL is going to bother anyone for the amount of traffic we're
likely to
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 15:00 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
My 2c on this issue: if this is ugly (and it is) and needs revisiting to
extend it, please by all means let's make it not ugly instead of moving
the ugliness around. I didn't read the original proposal in detail so
IMBFOS, but it
I've added this to the July commitfest.
Gregory Stark wrote:
Here's a copy of the merge-append patch that I sent months ago merged up to
head. I haven't really added any additional functionality since then.
Heikki suggested I separate the Append and MergeAppend nodes into two executor
Jeff Davis wrote:
1. Are you saying that an AM API change is the best route? If so, we
should probably start a discussion along those lines. Heikki is already
changing the API for index-only scans, and Dean's API change proposal
may be useful for Kenneth's unique hash indexes. You might as
I was just wondering idly today if we could usefully build a number of
indexes at the same time in a single pass over the heap, or could it be
that we wouldn't gain much? I haven't even got around to thinking about
any syntax for it.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
2009/7/14 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com:
Jeff Davis wrote:
The only problem there is telling the btree AM whether or not to do the
insert or not (i.e. fake versus real insert). Perhaps you can just do
that with careful use of a global variable?
Sure, all of this is a little
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I was just wondering idly today if we could usefully build a number of
indexes at the same time in a single pass over the heap, or could it be
that we wouldn't gain much? I haven't even got around to thinking about
any syntax for it.
Could we make it work on two
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 20:32 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
Well the ugliness referred to here (btree accessing the heap) seems
like a necessary evil. I don't think I want to add to it by
introducing global variables.
Ok, try to coordinate with Kenneth to make sure that the API change
satisfies
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I was just wondering idly today if we could usefully build a number of
indexes at the same time in a single pass over the heap, or could it be
that we wouldn't gain much? I haven't even got around to thinking about
Here's what I have found that got broken during pg_migrate: In two side
by
side databases (an 8.3.7 copy and 8.4.0 migrated with pg_migrator) the
pg_largeobject table has the same number of rows. However, in the 8.4
database any select for an loid in pg_largeobject returns zero rows.
Greetings,
attached is a simple patch that extends the functionality of dict_xsyn
extended synonym dictionary (from contrib) by adding the following
configuration option:
- mode option controls the current dictionary mode of operation. Can be one
of:
- in simple mode it accepts the
For a very long time I have thought that it would be useful to have some
sort of navigation menu for the docs similar to what you get with
doxygen. I had a brief look at it today but I am lost for a place to
start with it. Does anyone sufficiently understand how the docs work to
be able to
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 21:20:51 Josh Berkus wrote:
Also, what about producing Docs?
I'm working on making the documentation build part of the normal release
building rules.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 21:17:14 Josh Berkus wrote:
== Announcing ==
Announce to:
* PostgreSQL News
* pgsql-hackers
* pgsql-general(?)
* pgsql-packagers
Also pgsql-announce, no?
Yes.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:13:33PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 13:29 -0500, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
I am looking at adding unique support to hash indexes for 8.5 and
they will definitely need to visit the heap.
Have you seen this patch?
Hello,
this is first public version of our DefaultACLs patch as described on
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/DefaultACL .
It allows GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be inherited by objects based on
schema permissions at create type by use of ALTER SCHEMA foo SET DEFAULT
PRIVILEGES ON TABLE SELECT
Robert Haas wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc wrote:
Brendan Jurd wrote:
2009/7/14 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
+1 for redirecting the whole site. I don't think the extra CPU load
of SSL is going to bother anyone for the amount of
Hi,
Le 14 juil. 09 à 22:17, Andrew Dunstan a écrit :
For a very long time I have thought that it would be useful to have
some sort of navigation menu for the docs
Oh yes, pretty please :)
Navigating the docs requires far too much use of the back button and
up links, IMNSHO. A menu frame
Hi!
Itagaki Takahiro writes:
I updated Sampling profiler patch to be applied to HEAD cleanly.
[...]
Comments welcome.
I believe the profiler could give us a better understanding of where
different parts of the user visible response time originate from. The
problem with DTrace in my
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Hi,
Le 14 juil. 09 à 22:17, Andrew Dunstan a écrit :
For a very long time I have thought that it would be useful to have
some sort of navigation menu for the docs
Oh yes, pretty please :)
Navigating the docs requires far too much use of the back button and
up links,
Hi,
Query planning via GEQO currently can yield a different plan on every
invokation of the planner due to its non-exhaustive nature.
This often can be inconvenient because at times there may be a very
bad plan. It also makes it very hard to reproduce a problem with GEQO.
[PATCH 1/3] Add
---
src/include/port.h |2 ++
src/port/rand.c|8
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/include/port.h b/src/include/port.h
index cbf9dcf..af96620 100644
*** a/src/include/port.h
--- b/src/include/port.h
*** extern FILE
---
doc/src/sgml/config.sgml | 16
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
index 99d25d7..5d8eca9 100644
*** a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
*** archive_command =
---
src/backend/optimizer/geqo/Makefile |1 +
src/backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_copy.c |4 +-
src/backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_cx.c|6 +-
src/backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_erx.c | 47 ++--
src/backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_eval.c
Le 15 juil. 09 à 00:21, Andrew Dunstan a écrit :
Yes, really. What you suggest here is just not adequate, IMNSHO. I
don't want to have to scroll to the top or bottom of the page to get
navigation, and I want to be able to see the navigation and go where
I want directly.
Ok we don't share
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Yes, really. What you suggest here is just not adequate, IMNSHO. I don't
want to have to scroll to the top or bottom of the page to get
navigation, and I want to be able to see the navigation and go where I
want directly.
Are you talking about the online manuals, or
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I was just wondering idly today if we could usefully build a number of
indexes at the same time in a single pass over the heap, or could it be
that we
Richard Huxton wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Yes, really. What you suggest here is just not adequate, IMNSHO. I
don't want to have to scroll to the top or bottom of the page to get
navigation, and I want to be able to see the navigation and go where
I want directly.
Are you talking about
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Richard Huxton wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Yes, really. What you suggest here is just not adequate, IMNSHO. I
don't want to have to scroll to the top or bottom of the page to get
navigation, and I want to be able to see the navigation and go where
I want directly.
Greg Stark wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I was just wondering idly today if we could usefully build a number of
indexes at the same time in a single pass over
The time is now Wed Jul 15 00:18:00 UTC 2009 and CommitFest 2009-07 is
now closed. Please submit all new patches at:
http://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
Reviewing assignments will be sent to pgsql-rrreviewers in the next
few hours. I believe everyone who has
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
...
CREATE TABLE manytomany (aid integer, bid integer);
CREATE INDEX a_b ON manytomany (aid, bid);
CREATE INDEX b_a ON manytomany (bid, aid);
...
new and interesting indexing strategies. Covered indexes are also one
kind of materialized view. It may be better to
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Well, yes, it's some of it, and in theory Tom's late addition of a queue
that gets all the dependencies of a table as soon as the table data is
restored should make that work better. But of course, that's not the
only time indexes are created, and each index creation
Hi, Alvaro,
Does this work in compilers other than GCC? I think we use some
kludges to protect against them ... see pg_list.h for the canonical
example.
As I understand it, we're not using static inlines in pg_list.h to
prevent multiple objects from exporting the same symbols if the
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Ron Mayerrm...@cheapcomplexdevices.com wrote:
Really? I'd have thought that index is similar to materializing
these views:
create view a_b as select aid,bid from manytomany order by aid,bid;
create view b_a as select bid,aid from manytomany order by bid,aid;
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Tatsuo Ishiiis...@postgresql.org wrote:
Tsutomu was asking to add his patches to July commit festa:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00782.php
But it does not seem all subsequent replies agree that. What shall he
do? Just waits for
Tsutomu was asking to add his patches to July commit festa:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00782.php
But it does not seem all subsequent replies agree that. What shall he
do? Just waits for next commitfest?
Adding a patch to the CommitFest doesn't require
Robert,
Tsutomu was asking to add his patches to July commit festa:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00782.php
But it does not seem all subsequent replies agree that. What shall he
do? Just waits for next commit festa?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
The time is
2009/7/15 Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net:
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
What I'm thinking about is to extend current breadcumb at the top of the
page to include chapter, section, subsection. So that for exemple the
following page:
Hi,
I was thinking that could be useful to have a guc to indicate some
command to execute on rotation of logs (ok, i'm not inventing warm
water here, but...).
it could be useful for:
- load data from a csvlog to a table
- execute some magic to analyze logs
- archive logs (compress, move to
Stefan Moeding pg...@moeding.net wrote:
Have you thought about keeping the counters for each backend isolated?
I think in the end it would be beneficial to be able to break down the
response time for a critical business transaction in isolation instead
of having all backends in one figure.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Andres Freundand...@anarazel.de wrote:
---
doc/src/sgml/config.sgml | 16
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
index 99d25d7..5d8eca9 100644
***
Brendan Jurd escribió:
2009/7/15 Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net:
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Would have at its top:
Home → Documentation → Manuals → PostgreSQL 8.3 → Data Types → Geometric
Types → Points
Yes, really. What you suggest here is just not adequate, IMNSHO. I don't
want
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Jeremy Kerrj...@ozlabs.org wrote:
Hi, Alvaro,
Does this work in compilers other than GCC? I think we use some
kludges to protect against them ... see pg_list.h for the canonical
example.
As I understand it, we're not using static inlines in pg_list.h to
Jaime Casanova wrote:
this one looks good to me, the only adjust i made to the patch is
Thank you for your review!
---
Taro Minowa(Higepon)
http://www.monaos.org/
http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Jaime
Casanovajcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
On
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Heikki
Linnakangasheikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Here's one little thing in addition to all the stuff already discussed:
Thanks for the comment!
If that's the only such caller, let's introduce a new function for that
and keep the XLogFlush()
I am reviewing the following patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/8e2dbb700907071138y4ebe75cw81879aa513cf8...@mail.gmail.com
In order to provide useful feedback, I would like to reach a consensus
on a possible index AM API change to make it easier to support
deferrable constraints
97 matches
Mail list logo
