Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
(Hm, so we might want to make the probability depend on
max_connections?)
Without doing rigorous math on it, I'd guess that to prevent
contention among n connections you'd want the probably of resetting
the sweep to be about 1 / (n * 2). That would mean
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
I think it would make sense to just start using this once you get
into the last half or quarter of the free pages. If you go with the
last quarter, then you might want to use a higher probability than I
suggested above, although that would
Whilst fooling with the default ACLs patch I noticed that there's a
pre-existing bug in CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION. It will let you
replace a function if pg_proc_ownercheck passes, which these days
does *not* mean that you are exactly the role mentioned in
pg_proc.proowner; it only means you are
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Fuzzy thinking there -- if it's the last quarter of the *free* pages,
the suggested probabilities should be fine. (Somehow I got to
thinking, for a moment, that it would be the last quarter of the
relation's overall pages)
It's going to
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:52:06PM +0530, kunal sharma wrote:
Hi ,
We are using Postgres 8.4 and its been found going into recovery
mode couple of times. The server process seems to fork another child process
which is another postgres server running under same data directory and after
On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
My inclination is to think that the right behavior for REPLACE
FUNCTION
is to keep the old proowner and proacl values, because that's what it
always has done and nobody's complained. But I suppose a case could
be made that you're completely
Itagaki Takahiro escreveu:
I fixed the confusions of get, hit and read in your patch.
Works for me. Will mark it ready for a committer.
PS BTW, your patch (20091001112006.9c36.52131...@oss.ntt.co.jp) doesn't seem
to be in archives.p.o. though I've received a copy from the server.
--
Euler
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
Itagaki Takahiro escreveu:
I fixed the confusions of get, hit and read in your patch.
Works for me. Will mark it ready for a committer.
PS BTW, your patch (20091001112006.9c36.52131...@oss.ntt.co.jp) doesn't seem
to be in archives.p.o. though I've
David E. Wheeler escreveu:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
My inclination is to think that the right behavior for REPLACE FUNCTION
is to keep the old proowner and proacl values, because that's what it
always has done and nobody's complained. But I suppose a case could
be made
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
Itagaki Takahiro escreveu:
I fixed the confusions of get, hit and read in your patch.
Works for me. Will mark it ready for a committer.
PS BTW, your patch (20091001112006.9c36.52131...@oss.ntt.co.jp) doesn't
seem
to be in
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
eu...@timbira.com wrote:
David E. Wheeler escreveu:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
My inclination is to think that the right behavior for REPLACE FUNCTION
is to keep the old proowner and proacl values, because that's what
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
eu...@timbira.com wrote:
Robert Haas escreveu:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Euler Taveira de Oliveira eu...@timbira.com writes:
Tom Lane escreveu:
daveg da...@sonic.net writes:
I'd like to
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Petr Jelinek pjmo...@pjmodos.net writes:
because it seems like merging privileges seems to be acceptable for most
(although I am not sure I like it, but I don't have better solution for
managing conflicts), I changed the patch
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
eu...@timbira.com wrote:
David E. Wheeler escreveu:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
My inclination is to think that the right behavior for REPLACE FUNCTION
is to keep the old proowner and proacl values,
2009/10/1 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
eu...@timbira.com wrote:
David E. Wheeler escreveu:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
My inclination is to think that the right behavior for REPLACE FUNCTION
Robert Haas wrote:
2009/10/1 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
eu...@timbira.com wrote:
David E. Wheeler escreveu:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
My inclination is to think that the right behavior
2009/10/1 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Robert Haas wrote:
2009/10/1 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
eu...@timbira.com wrote:
David E. Wheeler escreveu:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
My
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
Can you at least take a stab at it? We can fix your grammar, but
guessing what's going on without documentation is hard.
With some help from David Fetter, I took another try at it. I
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 10:48:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
Can you at least take a stab at it? We can fix your grammar, but
guessing what's going on without documentation is hard.
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
