MauMau maumau...@gmail.com writes:
I re-submitted a patch and added a comment on the page below. I chose
patch from the comment type drop-down box, but the patch status does not
change from waiting on author. I expected the patch status would become
needs review.
No, adding a comment
From: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
MauMau maumau...@gmail.com writes:
I re-submitted a patch and added a comment on the page below. I chose
patch from the comment type drop-down box, but the patch status does
not
change from waiting on author. I expected the patch status would become
needs
On 2011-07-14 21:46, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
Sorry, the syscache part was mixed to contrib/sepgsql part
in my previous post.
Please see the attached revision.
Although its functionality is enough simple (it just reduces
number of system-call invocation), its performance
improvement is obvious.
So,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:37:54PM +0200, Žiga Kranjec wrote:
Hello!
Recently we have upgraded our debian system (sid),
which has since started crashing mysteriously.
We are still looking into that. It runs on 3ware RAID.
Postgres package is 8.4.8-2.
The database came back up apparently
Hi,
Isolation tests seem to deadlock on buildfarm member coypu (NetBSD/powerpc 5.1).
Here are the process for one deadlock (several days) :
pgbuildfarm 2405 0.0 1.2 26948 7916 ? Is Wed02AM0:00.25 postgres:
pgbuildfarm isolationtest [local] INSERT waiting
pgbuildfarm 6559 0.0
On Jul15, 2011, at 23:05 , Josh Berkus wrote:
* Bugfix for XPATH() if expression returns a scalar value
Well, Peter Eisentraut seemed to disagree with my approach initially,
and seemed to prefer a separate function for XPATH expressions which
return a scalar value.
Hi all,
The psql output for \d+ on indexes, sequences, and views is rather
bogus. Examples below from the SQL at bottom.
So, if you look at \d+ newtbl, the right-most column named Description
should display any comments attached to newtbl's columns. You should
see bcol column comment as the
Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com writes:
So, if you look at \d+ newtbl, the right-most column named Description
should display any comments attached to newtbl's columns. You should
see bcol column comment as the Description for column bcol. That
works OK.
Right.
Now, try this:
test=#
I wrote:
Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com writes:
What's the Description displayed in that table?
What it ought to be is the comment (if any) attached to the index's
column. Up through 8.4 this worked as expected, but in 9.0 and up
somebody seems to have disallowed comments on index
Rémi Zara wrote:
Isolation tests seem to deadlock on buildfarm member coypu
(NetBSD/powerpc 5.1).
It looks to me like both the extreme logging of waiting messages
and the days-long unrecognized deadlocks are coming from the new fk
tests added to the isolation testing schedule.
-Kevin
--
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 07:01:26PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of mié jul 13 01:34:10 -0400 2011:
coypu failed during the run of the test due to a different session being
chosen
as the deadlock victim. We can now vary deadlock_timeout to prevent this;
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 05:50:45PM +0200, Rémi Zara wrote:
Isolation tests seem to deadlock on buildfarm member coypu (NetBSD/powerpc
5.1).
Thanks for the report and detailed analysis. I believe the patch here will fix
the problem:
Noah Misch wrote:
With this patch in its final form, I have completed 180+ suite runs
without a failure.
The attached patch allows the tests to pass when
default_transaction_isolation is stricter than 'read committed'.
This is a slight change from the previously posted version of the
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Grittner writes:
OK, after getting distracted by test failures caused by an
unrelated commit, I've confirmed that this passes my usual tests.
I don't know anything about the tools used for extracting the text
for the translators, so if that needs any corresponding
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
You did miss some places that ought to be updated (mumble
sources.sgml mumble)
Sorry I missed that; sources.sgml covered with the attached.
Oh, I'd already fixed that locally, but thanks. Patch is committed now.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 01:03:31PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Noah Misch wrote:
With this patch in its final form, I have completed 180+ suite runs
without a failure.
The attached patch allows the tests to pass when
default_transaction_isolation is stricter than 'read committed'.
On 16.07.2011 03:14, Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Grittnerkevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
OK, after getting distracted by test failures caused by an unrelated
commit, I've confirmed that this passes my usual tests. I don't
know anything about the tools used for extracting the text for the
I wrote:
I think that it might be sensible to have the following behavior:
1. Parse the file, where parse means collect all the name = value
pairs. Bail out if we find any syntax errors at that level of detail.
(With this patch, we could report some or all of the syntax errors
first.)
2.
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
I think I would prefer something like this:
ERROR: could not serialize access due to read/write dependencies among
transactions
DETAIL: Reason code: %s
HINT: The transaction might succeed if retried.
That's my 2c, anyway. I
On Jul16, 2011, at 20:55 , Tom Lane wrote:
The original argument for the current behavior was to avoid applying
settings from a thoroughly munged config file, but I think that the
checks involved in steps 1-3 would be sufficient to reject files that
had major problems. It's possible that step
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
On the downside, the current behaviour prevents problems if someone changes
two interrelated GUCs, but makes a mistake at one of them. For example,
someone might drastically lower bgwriter_delay but might botch the matching
adjustment of
On Jul16, 2011, at 21:23 , Tom Lane wrote:
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
On the downside, the current behaviour prevents problems if someone changes
two interrelated GUCs, but makes a mistake at one of them. For example,
someone might drastically lower bgwriter_delay but might botch the
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
Btw, if we touch that, I think we should think about providing some way
to detect when a backend fails to apply a value.
Hm, maybe, but keep in mind that there are valid reasons for a backend
to ignore a postgresql.conf setting --- in particular, it might
On Jul16, 2011, at 22:55 , Tom Lane wrote:
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
Btw, if we touch that, I think we should think about providing some way
to detect when a backend fails to apply a value.
Hm, maybe, but keep in mind that there are valid reasons for a backend
to ignore a
I modeled the original message on what happens when statement timeout is
exceeded, which doesn't state its limit in the error message at all -
actually I did wonder if there is was informal standard for *not* stating
the value of the limit that is being exceeded! However, I agree with you and
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Alvaro,
It seems that by mentioning some people but not all, you offended both
the people you mentioned (at least some of them, because they are
already actively helping) and those that you didn't
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
2. Tentatively apply the new custom_variable_classes setting if any.
Is there any way that we could get *rid* of custom_variable_classes?
The idea of using a GUC to define the set of valid GUCs seems
intrinsically problematic.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I wrote:
Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com writes:
What's the Description displayed in that table?
What it ought to be is the comment (if any) attached to the index's
column. Up through 8.4 this worked as expected, but
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Žiga Kranjec z...@ljudmila.org wrote:
Recently we have upgraded our debian system (sid),
which has since started crashing mysteriously.
We are still looking into that. It runs on 3ware RAID.
Postgres package is 8.4.8-2.
The database came back up apparently
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Alvaro,
It seems that by mentioning some people but not all, you offended both
the people you mentioned (at least some of them, because they are
already actively helping)
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
2. Tentatively apply the new custom_variable_classes setting if any.
Is there any way that we could get *rid* of custom_variable_classes?
The idea of using a GUC to define the set of
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Jim Nasby j...@nasby.net wrote:
On Jul 13, 2011, at 2:23 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
Wasn't newsysviews supposed to deal with these sorts of issues? Why were
they rejected?
Unless they recently came up again and got rejected again; the original
complaint
On Jul 16, 2011, at 7:16 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
But what happens when and if we add global temporary tables? Now we
might very well decide to set the faux-relistemp to true for temporary
and global temporary tables (they do have temporary in the name,
after all!) and false for unlogged and
Mark Kirkwood mark.kirkw...@catalyst.net.nz writes:
This version moves the check *before* we write the new buffer, so
should take care of issues about really large write buffers, plugins
etc.
This logic seems pretty obviously wrong:
+ if (temp_file_limit = 0 VfdCache[file].fdstate
Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org writes:
Remember that what will happens is probably:
ERROR: aborting due to exceeding temp file limit. Current usage 8000kB,
requested size 8008kB, thus it will exceed temp file limit 8kB.
Could you please elaborate why Current usage 8000kB can bigger than
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
This mostly revoles around the problem of trying to finalize 9.1 while
applying 9.2 patches --- no surprise we don't have enough cycles to do
that.
Well, sorta. The fact that Josh got his head bitten off for
suggesting
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
2. Tentatively apply the new custom_variable_classes setting if any.
Is there any way that we could get *rid* of
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Is there any way that we could get *rid* of custom_variable_classes?
Well, we could just drop it and say you can set any dotted-name GUC
38 matches
Mail list logo
