Are there any features in SQL:2011 that we should be considering for 9.2?
We seem quite close on temporal stuff, so maybe just a little syntax work?
Not sure and not planning anything myself, just checking.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development,
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
order, say, prefix, postfix, infix.
(It might be surprising that something like this is necessary, but it
happens. ip4r for example contains operators with different fixnesses
(fixities?).)
I think it's called “arity” :)
Regards,
--
Dimitri
Marko Kreen mark...@gmail.com writes:
I tried to generalize a function that creates partitions
for a table and found out it's impossible to do it for grants.
Basically, what I want is a child table that takes it's grants
from parent table. IMHO quite reasonable request. But I don't
see a
Hello
this is relative simple patch that add possibility to skip noexisting
tables. It is necessary for silent cleaning when dump is loaded.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
*** ./doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml.orig 2011-12-01 22:47:20.0 +0100
--- ./doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml 2012-01-02
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
this is relative simple patch that add possibility to skip noexisting
tables. It is necessary for silent cleaning when dump is loaded.
Agreed, nice simple and uncontentious patch.
All good apart from two minor
On 2 Leden 2012, 14:11, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
this is relative simple patch that add possibility to skip noexisting
tables. It is necessary for silent cleaning when dump is loaded.
Just a curious question - what use case is solved by this? Under what
circumstances you get an ALTER TABLE
Hello
2012/1/2 Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz:
On 2 Leden 2012, 14:11, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
this is relative simple patch that add possibility to skip noexisting
tables. It is necessary for silent cleaning when dump is loaded.
Just a curious question - what use case is solved by this?
On Jan 2, 2012 5:33 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
I think I would like to have a set of GUC parameters to control the
location of the server-side SSL files. In a setup that has all the
other configuration files under /etc, the SSL files ought to go there as
well. (For
On Jan 2, 2012 12:02 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 12/31/2011 06:10 PM, Brar Piening wrote:
Brar Piening wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Can you narrow down exactly what in that commit broke VS 2010? Are
there any compiler warnings?
I was able to nail down the problem.
On 01/01/2012 04:05 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 12/31/2011 04:26 PM, Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of sáb dic 31 12:52:02 -0300
2011:
It's not a big thing, but I just found
Hello
here is updated patch
Regards
Pavel
2012/1/2 Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
this is relative simple patch that add possibility to skip noexisting
tables. It is necessary for silent cleaning when dump is
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:13:57PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
... but this performance test seems to me to be entirely misguided,
because it's testing a situation that isn't going to occur much
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Assuming that is the right approach, some timings
Um ... timings of what?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On 01/02/2012 09:51 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Jan 2, 2012 12:02 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net
mailto:and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 12/31/2011 06:10 PM, Brar Piening wrote:
Brar Piening wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Can you narrow down exactly what in that commit broke
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Simon is proposing to bound the
really bad case where you flip through the entire ring multiple times
before you find a buffer, and that may well be worth doing. But I
think even scanning 100 buffers every time you
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Does anyone have a better idea for reducing BufFreelistLock
contention? Something simple that will work for 9.2?
Get rid of the freelist? Once shared buffers are full, it's just about
useless anyway. But you'd need to think about the test cases that
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Assuming that is the right approach, some timings
Um ... timings of what?
Apologies for being terse, no problem to give a full explanation.
You suggested earlier that putting calls to
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 05:09:16PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Attached patch makes SnapshotNow into an MVCC snapshot, initialised at
the start of each scan iff SnapshotNow is passed as the scan's
snapshot. It's fairly brief but seems to do the trick.
That's a neat trick. However, if you start
On mån, 2012-01-02 at 09:33 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Are there any features in SQL:2011 that we should be considering for 9.2?
We seem quite close on temporal stuff, so maybe just a little syntax work?
I am aware of this piece on what's new in SQL:2011:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 05:09:16PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Attached patch makes SnapshotNow into an MVCC snapshot, initialised at
the start of each scan iff SnapshotNow is passed as the scan's
snapshot. It's fairly brief but
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On mån, 2012-01-02 at 09:33 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Are there any features in SQL:2011 that we should be considering for 9.2?
We seem quite close on temporal stuff, so maybe just a little syntax work?
I am aware of
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 05:09:16PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Attached patch makes SnapshotNow into an MVCC snapshot,
That's a neat trick. However, if you start a new SnapshotNow scan
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Um ... timings of what?
Apologies for being terse, no problem to give a full explanation.
But you still didn't. I wanted to know what those numbers were and how
they show that there's
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 06:41:31PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 05:09:16PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Attached patch makes SnapshotNow into an MVCC snapshot, initialised at
the start of each scan iff
Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of lun ene 02 16:25:25 -0300 2012:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 06:41:31PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 05:09:16PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Attached patch makes
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 23:09, Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
It also doesn't affect backups taken through pg_basebackup - but I
guess you have good reasons for not being able to use that?
Parallel
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 04:33:28PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of lun ene 02 16:25:25 -0300 2012:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 06:41:31PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 05:09:16PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Attached patch makes SnapshotNow into an MVCC snapshot,
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Um ... timings of what?
Apologies for being terse, no problem to give a full explanation.
But you still didn't. I
Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of lun ene 02 16:39:09 -0300 2012:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 04:33:28PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Uh, I thought detoasting had its own visibility test function .. I mean,
otherwise, what is HeapTupleSatisfiesToast for?
The SnapshotNow scan was
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of lun ene 02 16:39:09 -0300 2012:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 04:33:28PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Uh, I thought detoasting had its own visibility test function .. I mean,
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Does anyone have a better idea for reducing BufFreelistLock
contention? Something simple that will work for 9.2?
Get rid of the freelist? Once shared buffers are full, it's just about
Hello
2012/1/2 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net:
On mån, 2012-01-02 at 09:33 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Are there any features in SQL:2011 that we should be considering for 9.2?
trim_array can be simply implemented for one dim array. I am not sure
about semantic for multidim arrays.
Regards
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
But you still didn't. I wanted to know what those numbers were and how
they show that there's not a performance regression. Presumably you
meant that some were before and some after,
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
But you still didn't. I wanted to know what those numbers were and how
they show that there's not a performance
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 05:09:16PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Attached patch makes SnapshotNow into an MVCC snapshot,
On mån, 2012-01-02 at 15:55 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 01/02/2012 03:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
pg_regress: Replace exit_nicely() with exit() plus atexit() hook
This appears to have broken the buildfarm.
I think you mean it has caused the build to fail on some buildfarm
On mån, 2012-01-02 at 15:47 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Were you thinking one option pointing to a directory or one option per
file?
One option per file:
ssl_cert_file
ssl_key_file
ssl_ca_file
ssl_crl_file
This is very similar to the configuration of, for example, Apache,
Dovecot, Postfix,
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Well, that certainly goes to enough detail to agree that no, that
can't be done with only minor modifications to pg_basebackup. Nor
could it be done with your python program talking directly to the
walsender backend and get around it that way. But
On 01/02/2012 04:37 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2012-01-02 at 15:55 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 01/02/2012 03:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
pg_regress: Replace exit_nicely() with exit() plus atexit() hook
This appears to have broken the buildfarm.
I think you mean it has
On Jan 2, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
* Named arguments in function calls: done since PG 9.0; and we're
phasing out the = operator.
We don’t support `=` for params yet, right? Still just `:=`?
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 05:09:16PM +,
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 05:09:16PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Attached patch makes SnapshotNow into an MVCC snapshot, initialised at
the start of each
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:18:41AM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Just for the record, yes we do run multiple catalog scans in some
parts of the code.
So I can see how we might trigger 4 nested scans, using cache
replacement while scanning, so best assume more, with no guarantee of
them being
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On mån, 2012-01-02 at 15:47 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Were you thinking one option pointing to a directory or one option per
file?
One option per file:
That seems like serious overkill. Why not one option specifying the
directory? What use-case
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
(It's depressing that these numbers have hardly moved since August ---
at least on this test, the work that Robert's done has not made any
difference.)
Most of the scalability work that's been committed since August has
really
46 matches
Mail list logo
