On 6 April 2012 07:21, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On lör, 2012-03-24 at 10:01 +, Gianni Ciolli wrote:
ON (DELETE | UPDATE) actions for EACH foreign keys
==
-- --- ---
| ON
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 23:10 +0200, Miroslav Šimulčík wrote:
I have working patch for postgresql version 9.0.4, but it needs
refactoring before i can submit it, because some parts don't
meet formatting requirements yet. And yes, changes are large, so it
will be better to discuss design first
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Please let's apply that documentation patch to 9.2 too.
Agreed.
Here's a patch that does the first two things. Does not attempt a
tl;tr
On Jun15, 2012, at 07:50 , Magnus Hagander wrote:
So I've got very little patience with the idea of let's put in some
hooks and then great things will happen. It would be far better all
around if we supported exactly one, well-chosen, method. But really
I still don't see a reason not to let
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jun15, 2012, at 07:50 , Magnus Hagander wrote:
So I've got very little patience with the idea of let's put in some
hooks and then great things will happen. It would be far better all
around if we supported exactly one,
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Jun15, 2012, at 12:09 , Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jun15, 2012, at 07:50 , Magnus Hagander wrote:
Second, we also have things like the JDBC driver and the .Net driver
that don't use libpq. the JDBC driver uses the native
Hi,
I would like to ask a question before looking into the patch.
At 21:56 12/03/30 -0400, Jay Levitt wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Ants Aasmaa...@cybertec.at writes:
A user complained on pgsql-performance that SELECT col FROM table
GROUP BY col LIMIT 2; performs a full table scan. ISTM that it's
On 06/13/2012 03:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
Going through the thread, I'd like to sum it up choosing approach with
less potential issues and would like to find a consensus if possible.
It seems unix_socket_directory could be turned into list and probably
renamed to unix_socket_directories, since
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
A user complained on pgsql-performance that SELECT col FROM table
GROUP BY col LIMIT 2; performs a full table scan. ISTM that it's safe
to return tuples from hash-aggregate as they are found when no
aggregate
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Robert Haas rh...@postgresql.org wrote:
New SQL functons pg_backup_in_progress() and pg_backup_start_time()
Darold Gilles, reviewed by Gabriele Bartolini and others, rebased by
Marco
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jun15, 2012, at 12:09 , Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jun15, 2012, at 07:50 , Magnus Hagander wrote:
Second, we also have things like the JDBC driver and the
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
However, as Ants points out, we could make it work better for the
special case where we're not actually doing any aggregation, because
in that case we can emit the row for each group when the group is
created, rather
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had cause, a few times this development cycle, to want to measure
the amount of spinning on each lwlock in the system. To that end,
I've
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 07:18:34AM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jun15, 2012, at 12:09 , Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jun15, 2012, at 07:50 , Magnus
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jun15, 2012, at 12:09 , Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jun15, 2012, at 07:50 , Magnus Hagander wrote:
Second, we also have things like the JDBC driver and the
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had cause, a few times this development cycle, to want to measure
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Robert Haas rh...@postgresql.org wrote:
New SQL functons pg_backup_in_progress() and pg_backup_start_time()
On 15.06.2012 17:39, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Florian Pflugf...@phlo.org wrote:
The way I see it, if we use SSL-based compression then non-libpq clients
there's at least a chance of those clients being able to use it easily
(if their SSL implementation supports
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 15.06.2012 17:39, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Florian Pflugf...@phlo.org wrote:
The way I see it, if we use SSL-based compression then non-libpq clients
there's at
On 15 June 2012 15:54, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Robert Haas rh...@postgresql.org wrote:
New
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 15 June 2012 15:54, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
On Fri,
On 15 June 2012 16:09, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 15 June 2012 15:54, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012
On 15.06.2012 17:54, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Magnus Hagandermag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Robert Haasrh...@postgresql.org wrote:
New SQL functons
On 15.06.2012 17:58, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 15.06.2012 17:39, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Florian Pflugf...@phlo.orgwrote:
The way I see it, if we use
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 15.06.2012 17:58, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 15.06.2012 17:39, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri,
On 06/13/2012 03:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
A draft patch is attached. It renames unix_socket_directory to
unix_socket_directories and allows to use directory:port to be able
to
create more sockets in one directory with different port number in
the
socket name.
I realized the patch has some
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Umm, then you use a real SSL libray, not the dummy one?
But (in this scenario, and so far nobody has proven it to be wrong)
there exists no real SSL
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:28:48PM +0800, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 15.06.2012 17:58, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
On 15.06.2012 18:28, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 15.06.2012 17:58, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.comwrote:
You
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Vlad Arkhipov arhi...@dc.baikal.ru wrote:
Does it make sense to have a comment on function's arguments?
This would be somewhat tricky, because our COMMENT support assumes
that the object upon which we're commenting
Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 14 June 2012 19:28, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought that doubling repeatedly would be overly aggressive in terms
of memory usage.
I fail to understand how this sortsupport buffer fundamentally differs
from a generic dynamic
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 14 June 2012 19:28, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought that doubling repeatedly would be overly aggressive in terms
of memory usage.
I fail to understand how
All,
In the course of debugging why a particular server required increasing
max_locks_per_transation, I found a peculiar behavior. If you do an
UPDATE which doesn't match any CE constraint on the parent table in an
inheritance chain, you get a RowExclusiveLock on every partition and
every index
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
In the course of debugging why a particular server required increasing
max_locks_per_transation, I found a peculiar behavior. If you do an
UPDATE which doesn't match any CE constraint on the parent table in an
inheritance
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On 15.06.2012 06:19, Nikolas Everett wrote:
I'd like to be able to save the current snapshot and then at a later date
roll the entire database back to that snapshot, essentially erasing
everything that happened since the snapshot.
On 6/10/12 11:47 AM, Joshua Berkus wrote:
So currently we have a major limitation in binary replication, where it is
not possible to remaster your system (that is, designate the most caught-up
standby as the new master) based on streaming replication only. This is a
major limitation
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
(And from a performance standpoint, I'm not entirely convinced it's not
a bug, anyway. Worst-case behavior could be pretty bad.)
Instead of simply asserting that, could you respond
So it sounds unsurprising to me.
OK, I'll just submit a note for the docs for max_locks_per_transaction,
then.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I developed the attached patch to avoid taking a heavyweight lock on
the metapage of a hash index. Instead, an exclusive buffer content
lock is viewed as sufficient permission to modify the metapage, and a
shared buffer
The row-processor API is now in 9.2, but it solves only the
different-row-storage problem, but not the one-row-at-a-time
problem, as libpq is still in control until all rows are received.
This means libpq cannet still be used to implement iterative
result processing that almost all high-level
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I don't plan to throw in loads of conflict resolution smarts. The aim is to
get
to the place where all the infrastructure is there so that a MM solution can
be built by basically plugging in a conflict resolution
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
(And from a performance standpoint, I'm not entirely convinced it's not
a bug, anyway. Worst-case behavior could
On 15-06-2012 11:39, Magnus Hagander wrote:
As long as a free implementation exists, it can be ported to
Java/.Net. Sure, it takes more work, but it *can be done*.
Good point. IMHO, if there isn't a solution that cover all PostgreSQL (it
seems it is not), we should pick the most appropriate
On 15-06-2012 11:10, k...@rice.edu wrote:
I agree and think that the SSL-based compression is an excellent default
compression scheme. The plugable compression approach allows for the
choice of the most appropriate compression implementation based on the
application needs. It really addresses
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
So maybe instead of trying to cobble together a set of catalog
contents that we can use for decoding any tuple whatsoever, we
should instead divide the world into well-behaved types and
poorly-behaved types. Well-behaved types are those that can be
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
-The procedure for making a base backup is relatively simple:
+The easiest way to perform a base backup is to use the
+xref linkend=app-pgbasebackup tool. It can create
+a base backup either as regular files or as a tar archive. If
Le vendredi 15 juin 2012 03:27:11, Amit Kapila a écrit :
I guess my first question is: why do we need this? There are lots of
things in the TODO list that someone wanted once upon a time, but
they're not all actually important. Do you have reason to believe
that this one is? It's been
On 15 June 2012 21:06, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
(And from a performance standpoint, I'm not
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Marko Kreen mark...@gmail.com wrote:
The row-processor API is now in 9.2, but it solves only the
different-row-storage problem, but not the one-row-at-a-time
problem, as libpq is still in control until all rows are received.
This means libpq cannet still be
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
Yes, that means the list has over-flowed. Once it is over-flowed, it
is now invalid for the reminder of the life of the resource owner.
Don't we need any logic to clear the reference of locallock in owner-locks
array.
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Maybe I missed something, but as far as I saw your argument was not that
the performance wasn't bad but that the rest of the sort code would
dominate the runtime anyway. I grant that
Euler Taveira eu...@timbira.com writes:
I see the point in not adding another dependencies or reinventing the wheel
but I see more drawbacks than benefits in adopting a SSL-based compression.
In the end, judging this tradeoff is a matter of opinion, but I come to
the opposite conclusion.
Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
MAX_RESOWNER_LOCKS - How did you arrive at number 10 for it. Is there any
specific reason for 10.
I instrumented the code to record the maximum number of locks held by
a
On 15 June 2012 21:27, Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com wrote:
The goal for this first patch is to avoid semantics issues so that we
can get something technically clean in, and have more time to talk
semantics next times. The main discussion to avoid is deciding if we
want to fire
I wrote:
Euler Taveira eu...@timbira.com writes:
I see the point in not adding another dependencies or reinventing the wheel
but I see more drawbacks than benefits in adopting a SSL-based compression.
In the end, judging this tradeoff is a matter of opinion, but I come to
the opposite
On 10 June 2012 19:47, Joshua Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
So currently we have a major limitation in binary replication, where it is
not possible to remaster your system (that is, designate the most caught-up
standby as the new master) based on streaming replication only. This is a
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:48:24PM +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
Yeah, but that alone is IMO a rather big blocker for claiming that
this is the only way to do it :( And I think the fact that that
wikipedia page doesn't list any other ones, is a sign that there might
not be a lot of other
Hi,
This patch splits htup.h in two pieces -- the first one (tupbasics.h;
not wedded to the name) does not include many other headers and is just
enough to have other parts of the code create tuples and pass them
around, to be used by most other headers. The other one (which keeps
the name
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org writes:
This patch splits htup.h in two pieces -- the first one (tupbasics.h;
not wedded to the name) does not include many other headers and is just
enough to have other parts of the code create tuples and pass them
around, to be used by most other
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
MAX_RESOWNER_LOCKS - How did you arrive at number 10 for it. Is there any
specific reason for 10.
I
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:50:48PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:57:41PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
What about something like this in the root of the tree:
find . -name \*.pl -o -name \*.pm | xargs perltidy -b -bl -nsfs -naws
-l=100 -ole=unix
There are files
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
OK, based on this feedback, I have updated the pgindent README to use
these Perl indent instructions:
find . -name \*.pl -o -name \*.pm | xargs perltidy \
--backup-and-modify-in-place --opening-brace-on-new-line \
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
- The procedure for making a base backup is relatively simple:
+ The easiest way to perform a base backup is to use the
+ xref linkend=app-pgbasebackup tool. It
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:48:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
OK, based on this feedback, I have updated the pgindent README to use
these Perl indent instructions:
find . -name \*.pl -o -name \*.pm | xargs perltidy \
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 15.06.2012 18:28, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 15.06.2012 17:58, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Euler Taveira eu...@timbira.com wrote:
On 15-06-2012 11:39, Magnus Hagander wrote:
As long as a free implementation exists, it can be ported to
Java/.Net. Sure, it takes more work, but it *can be done*.
Good point. IMHO, if there isn't a solution that cover
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I wrote:
Euler Taveira eu...@timbira.com writes:
I see the point in not adding another dependencies or reinventing the wheel
but I see more drawbacks than benefits in adopting a SSL-based compression.
In the end, judging
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 15.06.2012 17:54, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Magnus Hagandermag...@hagander.net
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 10 June 2012 19:47, Joshua Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
So currently we have a major limitation in binary replication, where it is
not possible to remaster your system (that is, designate the most
caught-up
On 16-06-2012 00:43, Magnus Hagander wrote:
For example, we can no longer trust the SSL library to always do
encryption, since we specifically want to support null encryption.
Meaning we need to teach pg_hba to treat a connection with null
encryption as hostnossl, even if it's an
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Euler Taveira eu...@timbira.com wrote:
On 15-06-2012 11:39, Magnus Hagander wrote:
As long as a free implementation exists, it can be ported to
Java/.Net. Sure, it takes more work, but
On 06/14/2012 11:59 PM, Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
I'll have a play with it and see if a simple switch to NetworkService
seems feasible.
OK, I worked up a patch which uses NT AUTHORITY\NetworkService as
the service account by default.
Marko Kreen mark...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Fair enough if we decide that - but we should make that decision
knowing that we're leaving the JDBC and .Net people in a bad position
where they are not likely to be able to
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Yes, but there's also a lot of such awkward logic we need to add if we
*do* go with the SSL library doing the compression:
For example, we can no longer trust the SSL library to always do
encryption, since we specifically want to support null
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:45:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have updated the pgindent README to use
these Perl indent instructions:
find . -name \*.pl -o -name \*.pm | xargs perltidy \
--backup-and-modify-in-place --opening-brace-on-new-line \
76 matches
Mail list logo
