On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:36:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
\eset variable [, variable [..]] query -- it raise exception when
more than one row is returned or when no row is returned
Better would be a variant on \g, that is you type in the query
2012/7/26 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:36:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
\eset variable [, variable [..]] query -- it raise exception when
more than one row is returned or when no row is returned
Better would be a
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:31:13AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2012/7/26 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:36:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
\eset variable [, variable [..]] query -- it raise exception when
more than
2012/7/26 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:31:13AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2012/7/26 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:36:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
\eset variable [, variable [..]] query
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:40:14PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:30:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tom suggested that load_directory() return a (char *) array, rather than
a struct dirent array, greatly simplifying the code.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:08:09AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of dom jul 22 17:11:53 -0400 2012:
setting i-rc isolation = READ COMMITTED
setting i-rr isolation = REPEATABLE READ
session s1
setup{ BEGIN TRANSACTION ISOLATION
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:11:27PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2012-07-23 at 10:08 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Relying on the number of hard links seems very fragile. For example,
it'll break if you are using copy mode. And it won't work on Windows,
either.
pg_upgrade could
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:30:40AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:11:27PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2012-07-23 at 10:08 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Relying on the number of hard links seems very fragile. For example,
it'll break if you are using copy
On tor, 2012-07-26 at 08:30 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:11:27PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2012-07-23 at 10:08 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Relying on the number of hard links seems very fragile. For example,
it'll break if you are using copy mode.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of mié jul 25 18:23:46 -0400 2012:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié jul 25 16:25:36 -0400 2012:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org writes:
Apparently, this
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
I was playing around with partitioning recently, and was annoyed that
tab completion doesn't work for setting the table to (dis)inherit.
Thanks for the patch. Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of mié jul 25 18:23:46 -0400 2012:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié jul 25 16:25:36 -0400
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
I think I could create a list and pass that into a loop so only
the command has to be modified, but again, how do we do that on Windows?
Can we create a shell function in Windows and pass the file name as an
argument?
I
On 07/26/2012 09:59 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I think I could create a list and pass that into a loop so only
the command has to be modified, but again, how do we do that on Windows?
Can we create a shell function in Windows and pass the file name as an
argument?
I don't know, but I assume
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:59:46PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tor, 2012-07-26 at 08:30 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:11:27PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2012-07-23 at 10:08 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Relying on the number of hard links seems very
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:26:53AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, then that would call for another list of files.
I cannot escape the feeling that if we go down this route in any form
we're going to spend years tracking down data-loss-inducing bugs. The
ones we have on the master are bad
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:26:53AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, then that would call for another list of files.
I cannot escape the feeling that if we go down this route in any form
we're going to spend years tracking
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:03:15AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
IMV, pg_upgrade is not yet sufficiently reliable that we should be
looking for new projects that seem certain to make it less reliable.
The script has to make the primary/standby identical, and guarantee
that. That is why one
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:00:37PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
Either way the data in c and d are IN THE INDEX otherwise in neither
case could the data values be returned while strictly querying the index.
So the question that needs to be asked is what kind of performance increase
can be
Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of jue jul 26 06:28:54 -0400 2012:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:08:09AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I would expect that if no permutations are specified, all possible
values for a certain setting would be generated. That way it'd be easy
to define
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:00:37PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
Either way the data in c and d are IN THE INDEX otherwise in neither
case could the data values be returned while strictly querying the index.
So the
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:00:37PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
Either way the data in c and d are IN THE INDEX otherwise in neither
case could the
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I don't see the don't modify the user files behavior changing anytime
soon, and it is documented, so I feel pretty confident that those files
were not modified on the primary or standby cluster, and are hence the
same, or
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think so. The case where you want a wide multiple column primary
key to be extended to cover that one extra commonly grabbed value is
not super common but entirely plausible. With the existing
infrastructure to get
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I don't see the don't modify the user files behavior changing anytime
soon, and it is documented, so I feel pretty confident that those files
were not
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 14:17 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yes, that would be a problem because the WAL records are deleted by
pg_upgrade. Does a shutdown of the standby not already replay all WAL
logs?
There is no notion of all WAL logs because the WAL is infinite. Do you
mean all WAL
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
I was originally thinking that we would require users to run pg_upgrade
on the standby, where you need to first switch into master mode.
That sounds a little strange to me. If the original master has generated
WAL that the
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com wrote:
For example: suppose pg_upgrade emitted full-page-write records in the
format of the new postgres version on an unoccupied timeline. One can
use PG.next tools to report on the first txid
and by txid I meant WAL position,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:17:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Is that sufficient?
Well, at the very least, you need to guarantee that the standby is
caught up - i.e. that it replayed all the WAL records that were
generated on the master before it was shut down for the final time. I
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:26:16PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 14:17 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yes, that would be a problem because the WAL records are deleted by
pg_upgrade. Does a shutdown of the standby not already replay all WAL
logs?
There is no notion of all
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:16:29PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of jue jul 26 06:28:54 -0400 2012:
var isolation = { rc = READ COMMITTED, rr = REPEATABLE READ
}
Agreed. What would be the syntax to specify a particular value to use
in a permutation?
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 04:11:21PM +0200, jg wrote:
Hi,
The PostgreSQK documentation refers to diskchecker.pl on the page
http://brad.livejournal.com/2116715.html
But on this page, the given link for diskchecker.pl does not exist anymore.
After some unsuccessfull queries on Google to find
On 7/26/12 5:35 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 04:11:21PM +0200, jg wrote:
Hi,
The PostgreSQK documentation refers to diskchecker.pl on the page
http://brad.livejournal.com/2116715.html
But on this page, the given link for diskchecker.pl does not exist anymore.
After some
On 7/26/12 5:35 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 04:11:21PM +0200, jg wrote:
Hi,
The PostgreSQK documentation refers to diskchecker.pl on the page
http://brad.livejournal.com/2116715.html
But on this page, the given link for diskchecker.pl does not exist anymore.
After some
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 06:07:30PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 7/26/12 5:35 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 04:11:21PM +0200, jg wrote:
Hi,
The PostgreSQK documentation refers to diskchecker.pl on the page
http://brad.livejournal.com/2116715.html
But on this page,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:11:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 06:07:30PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 7/26/12 5:35 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 04:11:21PM +0200, jg wrote:
Hi,
The PostgreSQK documentation refers to diskchecker.pl on the
Hi, guys.
Here is my task situation:
I have a TupleTableSlot, with its own TupleDesc. Now I want to extract
several attributes to form a new TupleTableSlot, how can I define my own
TupleDesc and the ProjectionInfo?
Best.
It seems strange that the external_pid_file is never removed. There is
even a C comment about it:
/* Should we remove the pid file on postmaster exit? */
I think it should be removed with proc_exit hook just like the main
postmaster.pid file.
Does anyone remember why this was not done
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2012/7/26 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
How about
\gset var1,,,var2,var3...
I don't like this - you can use fake variable - and ignoring some
variable has no big effect on client
Why assign to a variable you'll never use?
so why you get data
39 matches
Mail list logo
