From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp writes:
As described in the reference manual for COPY, we should to check file's
path
format not to allow relative path. Please find attached a patch.
The argument for disallowing writing to a relative
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Ross Reedstrom reeds...@rice.edu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:45:04PM -0800, Will Leinweber wrote:
My coworker Dan suggested that some people copy and paste scripts. However
I feel that that is an orthogonal problem and if there is a very high rate
of
Hi list,
I have a table with (start_time, end_time) and I'd want to tally up
the number of concurrent connections at any point in time. The Merge
Append plan node introduced in 9.1 would be perfect for this purpose.
It seems to work out fine for the most trivial case, but just when I
add an WHERE
Hello
here is updated patch
postgres=# copy omega to '/tmp/xxx';
COPY 60
postgres=# do $$ declare r int;
begin
copy omega from '/tmp/xxx'; get diagnostics r = row_count; raise
notice ' %', r;
end;
$$ language plpgsql;
NOTICE: 60
DO
Regards
Pavel
2012/8/16 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us:
On 09.08.2012 18:42, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
In this revision of patch I tried to handle conditions more generally using
variables minLower, maxLower, minUpper, maxUpper, inclusive and
strictEmpty. However some strategies still contain additional logic.
Thanks, that clarified the code
On 15.08.2012 11:34, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Histogram of upper bounds would be both more
accurate and natural for some operators. However, it requires collecting
additional statistics while
On 15.08.2012 11:34, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Histogram of upper bounds would be both more
accurate and natural for some operators. However, it requires collecting
additional statistics while
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of jue ago 02 10:48:02 -0400 2012:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Don't forget the peculiarities of columns with record types.
I forgot to include the type creation in the example:
test=# create type a as (a1 int, a2 int);
Marti Raudsepp ma...@juffo.org writes:
Is this just a planner shortcoming or a bug? Or is there some
justification for this behavior?
Per the comment in is_safe_append_member():
* It's only safe to pull up the child if its jointree contains exactly
* one RTE, else the AppendRelInfo
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mié ago 15 18:30:40 -0400 2012:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 01:20:17AM +0300, Ants Aasma wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
I wonder what happens if files in the same subdir are grouped in a
I have used your notes below to rewrite the Window function SQL manual
section. As you said, it was very hard to read. I now understand it
better, having restructured it, and I hope others do too.
After waiting 30 minutes for our developer doc build to refresh, I am
giving up and posting my
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:38:18PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org writes:
I just noticed that HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid is comparing
Xmax as a TransactionId without verifying
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 16.08.2012 17:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 16.08.2012 17:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
In docs, change a few cases of not important to
unimportant.
FWIW, I don't think these changes were an improvement. I
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:38:14AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of jue ago 16 11:24:55 -0400 2012:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:38:18PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera
I found a tool that Google authored that attempts to solve the same
problems as pgrminclude does in our codebase. It's called include
what you use, and is based on Clang. The project is hosted here:
http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/
I'm not suggesting that we should start using
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:48:34PM +0100, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
I found a tool that Google authored that attempts to solve the same
problems as pgrminclude does in our codebase. It's called include
what you use, and is based on Clang. The project is hosted here:
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of jue ago 16 11:44:48 -0400 2012:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:38:14AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of jue ago 16 11:24:55 -0400 2012:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:38:18PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17,
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I think that a NOT NULL constraint attached to a column with a
composite type is equivalent to a CHECK (col IS DISTINCT FROM
NULL); at least they seem to behave identically. Is that what you
would expect?
I had not thought about that, but now
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:38:09AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 16.08.2012 17:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 16.08.2012 17:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
In docs, change a few cases of not important to
On 16 August 2012 16:56, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Good to know. We only use pgrminclude very five years or so, and Tom
isn't even keen on that.
Yeah. Even if this could be made to work well, we'd still have to do
something like get an absolute consensus from all build farm animals,
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of jue ago 16 11:24:55 -0400 2012:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:38:18PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org writes:
I just noticed that
2012/8/15 David E. Wheeler da...@justatheory.com
On Aug 15, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
Is there any reason not to add $subject? Would it be difficult?
Looking to the source code I think this feature isn't hard to
implement... I'm writing a little path to do that
On 08/16/2012 01:36 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
2012/8/15 David E. Wheeler da...@justatheory.com
mailto:da...@justatheory.com
On Aug 15, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
Is there any reason not to add $subject? Would it be difficult?
Looking to
On Aug 16, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
The attached patch implement this feature:
CREATE SCHEMA [ IF NOT EXISTS ] schema_name [ AUTHORIZATION user_name ] [
schema_element [ ... ] ]
CREATE SCHEMA [ IF NOT EXISTS ] AUTHORIZATION user_name [ schema_element [
... ] ]
2012/8/16 David E. Wheeler da...@justatheory.com
On Aug 16, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
The attached patch implement this feature:
CREATE SCHEMA [ IF NOT EXISTS ] schema_name [ AUTHORIZATION user_name ]
[ schema_element [ ... ] ]
CREATE SCHEMA [ IF NOT EXISTS ]
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 05:31:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
It looks like \copy is just passing the text of the query unadjusted to
COPY. I get a syntax error on :x with the \copy below on both 9.0 and
9.1
===
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:57:08PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 17:36 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:34:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 09:00:11PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
So what do we want to do with this? I am a little concerned that
we are sacrificing code clarity for backpatching ease, but I don't
do as much backpatching as Tom.
Well, if you back-patched this change, it would eliminate the issue
for Tom, wouldn't
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 02:21:12PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
So what do we want to do with this? I am a little concerned that
we are sacrificing code clarity for backpatching ease, but I don't
do as much backpatching as Tom.
Well, if you
On 8/15/12 3:28 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
Aside: the performance gains I'm seeing for IOS are nothing short of
spectacular.
Do you have some metrics? I could use them for publicity stuff.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Hello Jonah, Simon, and the hackers,
I am going to implement a simple kind of encoded bitmap indexes (EBI).
That is an index type where the bitmap columns may not only contain
only a single '1' in the set of bits belonging to a tuple. Instead, an
additional mapping table translates the distinct
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:07:25AM -0400, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
I have tried reproducing the bug starting from 1 and 2 transactions
before
the one shown in snippet, and I used
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:15:24AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mié ago 15 18:30:40 -0400 2012:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 01:20:17AM +0300, Ants Aasma wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
I
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:27:02PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
The following comment - or at least the last sentence thereof -
appears to be out of date.
/*
* XXX Should we update the FSM information of this page ?
*
* There are two schools of thought here.
On 27 July 2012 16:39, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you suggest a benchmark that will usefully exercise this patch?
I think the given sizes below work on most 64 bit machines.
My apologies for not getting around to taking a look at this sooner.
I tested this patch on my x86_64
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 08:20:02AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I would like to ask is that why you think walreceiver is more
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 07:08:27PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
We need a function called transactionid_current() so a normal user can
write
select virtualtransaction
from pg_locks
where transactionid = transactionid_current()
and
2012/8/16 Fabrízio de Royes Mello fabriziome...@gmail.com:
The attached patch implement this feature:
CREATE SCHEMA [ IF NOT EXISTS ] schema_name [ AUTHORIZATION user_name ] [
schema_element [ ... ] ]
CREATE SCHEMA [ IF NOT EXISTS ] AUTHORIZATION user_name [ schema_element [
... ] ]
Now,
Did we make any headway on this?
---
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:31:09PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
Andres,
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
For that I added new functions/defines which allocate all the
Is this a TODO?
---
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:31:09PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
Andres,
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
For that I added new functions/defines which allocate all the needed memory
in
Did we want to apply this?
---
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 07:33:18PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The real question is do we favour HOT cleanup on those
Did we ever make a decision on this patch?
---
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 09:22:50PM +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
On some recent benchmarks and profile data, I saw GetSnapshotData
figures at the very top or near top. For
A TODO for this?
---
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 02:53:42PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@bfk.de wrote:
* Robert Haas:
I tried whacking out the call to
Was this resolved? (Sorry to be bugging everyone.)
---
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:42:10PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Just confirming we decided not
Bruce,
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
Did we make any headway on this?
I've got the code written but I need to test it in a stable environment
to see what kind of improvment it provides. I've actually been fighting
for the past 2 months with the box that I want to use and think I
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 09:51:28PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
Bruce,
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
Did we make any headway on this?
I've got the code written but I need to test it in a stable environment
to see what kind of improvment it provides. I've actually been
FYI, I am planning to go ahead and package this tool in /contrib for PG
9.3.
---
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 08:26:12PM -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
On 12/09/2011 06:48 PM, Ants Aasma wrote:
The attached test program
Greetings,
When doing tab-completion under 9.1, pg_table_is_visible(oid) is slow
and is ending up as the first thing tested against all the rows
in pg_class. Increasing the cost of pg_table_is_visible() up to
10 causes it to move to the end of the tests, which improves things
greatly-
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:30:23 +0200
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Monday, July 09, 2012 08:11:00 AM Tom Lane wrote:
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) writes:
Also, I was under the impression that recent Linux kernels use
hugepages automatically if they can, so I
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 08:09 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
It seems strange that the external_pid_file is never removed. There is
even a C comment about it:
/* Should we remove the pid file on postmaster exit? */
I think it should be removed with proc_exit hook just like the main
50 matches
Mail list logo
