Le samedi 17 novembre 2012 22:57:49, Tom Lane a écrit :
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
Do we really need to store the settings in a system table?
Since WAL would be generated when storing the settings
in a system table, this approach seems to prevent us from
changing the
On 16 November 2012 11:25, Kevin Grittner kgri...@mail.com wrote:
16. To get new data into the MV, the command is LOAD MATERIALIZED
VIEW mat view_name. This seemed more descriptive to me that the
alternatives and avoids declaring any new keywords beyond
MATERIALIZED. If the MV is flagged as
On 11/17/2012 10:18 PM, Michael Giannakopoulos wrote:
Hello guys,
My name is Michail Giannakopoulos and I am a graduate student at
University of Toronto. I have no previous experience in developing a
system like postgreSQL before.
What I am trying to explore is if it is possible to extend
On 17 November 2012 21:20, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
ISTM that we should tune that specifically by performing a VM lookup
for next 32 pages (or more), so we reduce the lookups well below 1 per
page. That way the overhead of using the VM will be similar to using
the PD_ALL_VISIBLE.
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 03:07:01 AM Jeff Davis wrote:
Process A (process that clears a VM bit for a data page):
1. Acquires exclusive lock on data buffer
2. Acquires exclusive lock on VM buffer
3. clears VM bit
4. Releases VM buffer lock
5. Releases data buffer lock
Well, but
On 18 November 2012 08:52, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The difference here is that we still need to check visibility of each
tuple, but that can be a very cheap check and never involves clog, nor
does it dirty the page. Tuple access is reasonably expensive in
comparison with a
(In a test setup) I can't get pg_archivecleanup to remove WALfiles in 9.3devel.
(A very similar
setup in 9.2 works fine).
In 9.3 pg_archivecleanup just keeps repeating lines like:
pg_archivecleanup: keep WAL file
/home/aardvark/pg_stuff/archive_dir93/
and later
(and
On 2012-11-17 19:14:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.comwrote:
Hi,
On 2012-11-16 13:44:45 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
This patch looks OK.
I got 3 comments:
1) Why changing the OID of
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Oct 23, 2012 4:52 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Boszormenyi Zoltan escribió:
Also, the check for conflict between -R and -x/-X is now removed.
The documentation for option -R has changed
On Sun, 2012-11-18 at 15:19 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 03:07:01 AM Jeff Davis wrote:
Process A (process that clears a VM bit for a data page):
1. Acquires exclusive lock on data buffer
2. Acquires exclusive lock on VM buffer
3. clears VM bit
4.
Hi,
2012-11-18 17:20 keltezéssel, Magnus Hagander írta:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Oct 23, 2012 4:52 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Boszormenyi Zoltan escribió:
Also, the check for conflict between -R and -x/-X is now
The discussion of bug #7670 showed that what's happening there is that
if you specify a log_rotation_age of more than 25 days (2^31 msec),
WaitLatch will sometimes be passed a timeout of more than 2^31 msec,
leading to unportable behavior. At least some kernels will return
EINVAL for that, and
shouldn't defer decisions that would affect that (e.g.
doing checksum calculation in larger chunks, ignoring the page hole, or
using a different scheme for the bits in the header).
Regards,
Jeff Davis
replace-tli-with-checksums-20121118.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On 2012-11-18 14:57:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
The discussion of bug #7670 showed that what's happening there is that
if you specify a log_rotation_age of more than 25 days (2^31 msec),
WaitLatch will sometimes be passed a timeout of more than 2^31 msec,
leading to unportable behavior. At
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
I think at least wal_sender_timeout and wal_receiver_timeout are also
problematic.
I looked at those and didn't see a problem --- what are you worried
about exactly?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On 2012-11-18 15:21:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
I think at least wal_sender_timeout and wal_receiver_timeout are also
problematic.
I looked at those and didn't see a problem --- what are you worried
about exactly?
Forget it, too hungry to read the
Hackers,
Attached patch enables GIN to store additional information with item
pointers in posting lists and trees.
Such additional information could be positions of words, positions of
trigrams, lengths of arrays and so on.
This is the first and most huge patch of serie of GIN improvements which
Hi!
On 26.9.2012 19:18, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Excerpts from Euler Taveira's message of mié sep 26 11:53:27 -0300 2012:
On 26-09-2012 09:43, Tomas Vondra wrote:
5) splitting the
Hi,
On 16/11/2012 15:52, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Marko Tiikkaja pgm...@joh.to writes:
The general output scheme looks like this:
schemaname/OBJECT_TYPES/object_name.sql,
I like this feature, I actually did have to code it myself in the past
and several other people did so, so we already
On 26.9.2012 18:29, Tom Lane wrote:
What seems to me like it could help more is fixing things so that the
autovac launcher needn't even launch a child process for databases that
haven't had any updates lately. I'm not sure how to do that, but it
probably involves getting the stats collector
The INT_MIN / -1 crash problem was partially addressed in 2006 and
commit 9fc6f4e1ae107f44807c4906105e1f7eb052ecb1.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-06/msg00102.php
However, the fix is incomplete and incorrect for some cases.
64-bit crash
Below is an example that
Xi Wang xi.w...@gmail.com writes:
[ patch adding a bunch of explicit INT_MIN/MAX constants ]
I was against this style of coding before, and I still am.
For one thing, it's just about certain to introduce conflicts
against system headers.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl wrote:
(In a test setup) I can't get pg_archivecleanup to remove WALfiles in
9.3devel. (A very similar
setup in 9.2 works fine).
In 9.3 pg_archivecleanup just keeps repeating lines like:
pg_archivecleanup: keep WAL file
On 11/18/2012 09:57 PM, Michael Giannakopoulos wrote:
Hi guys,
Thanks for your answers. Yes, what I meant is to create a function
that takes as an input rows of a specific relation, does something and
returns as an output rows with different attributes. I am
experimenting right now with the
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Amit kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
On Saturday, October 20, 2012 11:03 PM Jeff Janes wrote:
Run the modes in reciprocating order?
Sorry, I didn't understood this, What do you mean by modes in reciprocating
order?
Sorry for the long delay. In your
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Andrea Suisani sick...@opinioni.netwrote:
Il 16/11/2012 05:34, Michael Paquier ha scritto:
Do you have a git repository or something where all the 14 patches are
applied? I would like to test the feature globally.
Sorry I recall that you put a link somewhere
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Amit kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
Today again I have again collected the data for configuration Shared_buffers
= 7G along with vmstat.
The data and vmstat information (bi) are attached with this mail. It is
observed from vmstat info that I/O is
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Michael Paquier
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Maybe I missed something here, but I believe it's standard that
program --help should result in exit(0), no matter what the program's
exitcode conventions are for live-fire exercises.
Yes indeed you are right. Thanks.
--
On 11/18/12 6:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Xi Wang xi.w...@gmail.com writes:
[ patch adding a bunch of explicit INT_MIN/MAX constants ]
I was against this style of coding before, and I still am.
For one thing, it's just about certain to introduce conflicts
against system headers.
I totally
On 15.11.2012 20:39, Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose to extend pg_trgm so that it can compare a partial-match
query key to a GIN index. IOW, I'm thinking to implement the 'comparePartial'
GIN method for pg_trgm.
Currently, when the query key is less than three characters, we
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 3:08 AM Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com
wrote:
1. have a system table pg_global_system_settings(key,value)
Do we really need to store the settings in a system table?
Since WAL would be generated when
hi
I install postgresql-9.1.5 from source code on windows successfully.
But there is not libecpg_compat.lib and libpgtypes.lib in the
installed lib directory .
If someone used functions of pgtypes or ecpg_compat library in ecpg
programs,the ecpg program build will fail.
So i modify
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that we cannot do a partial-match if KEEPONLYALNUM is disabled,
i.e., if query key contains multibyte characters. In this case, byte
length of
the trigram string might be larger than three, and its CRC is
Hi,
I am just looking at this patch and will provide some comments.
By the way, you forgot the installation part of pg_receivellog, please see
patch attached.
Thanks,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.comwrote:
---
src/bin/pg_basebackup/Makefile | 7
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 3:28 AM Tom Lane wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
Do we really need to store the settings in a system table?
Since WAL would be generated when storing the settings
in a system table, this approach seems to prevent us from
changing the settings
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 3:22 PM Cédric Villemain wrote:
Le samedi 17 novembre 2012 22:57:49, Tom Lane a écrit :
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
Do we really need to store the settings in a system table?
Since WAL would be generated when storing the settings in a system
Hi Andres,
I have been able to fetch your code (thanks Andrea!) and some it. For the
time being I am spending some time reading the code and understanding the
whole set of features you are trying to implement inside core, even if I
got some background from what you presented at PGCon and from the
38 matches
Mail list logo
