On 21 November 2013 08:09, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I wrote new styles for psql table borders.
http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql
This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting for
final presentation.
Do you think so this
YES!
+1
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 20 November 2013 22:46, Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
Tom == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Tom 1. Reinsert HEAD's prohibition against directly combining WITH
Tom ORDINALITY with a coldeflist (with a better error message and a
Tom HINT suggesting that you can get
Hi,
I started reviewing this patch. Gone through the mail thread discussion to
understand the need of the patch. With patch there is significant
performance
improvement in case of update for the array scalar variable.
- Patch gets apply cleanly on master branch
- make, make install and make
Hi everyone
I used to work on a project storing large quantities of schema-less data,
initially using MongoDB, then Postgres with JSON, and eventually I
implemented BSON support for Postgres to get the best of both worlds:
https://github.com/maciekgajewski/postgresbson
I don't think that JSONB
I'm not quite sure why nobody else seems to be complaining, but the changes
to type.h in this commit seems to have broken things little.
In the visual studios build I'm getting:
src\interfaces\ecpg\preproc\preproc.y(84): error C2065: 'ET_FATAL' :
undeclared identifier
Hi,
On 2013-11-19 18:49:27 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
But for that the receiving side needs to know up to where changes have
been applied. One relatively easy solution for that is that the
receiving side does something like:
UPDATE replication_progress SET lsn = '0/1600' WHERE source_id
On 2013-11-19 14:16:04 +, Greg Stark wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.comwrote:
But for that the receiving side needs to know up to where changes have
been applied. One relatively easy solution for that is that the
receiving side does something
On 2013-11-20 15:05:17 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
That's what I had suggested to some people originally and the response
was, well, somewhat unenthusiastic. It's not that easy to assign them in
a meaningful automated manner. How do you automatically assign a pg
cluster an id?
On 2013-11-20 17:46:22 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-11-20 18:25:56 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Isn't it possible that the standby has already incorrectly set
HEAP_XMIN_INVALID hint bit on a page? The full page images generated by
VACUUM FREEZE will correct the damage, but if
On 19 November 2013 10:33 Amit Kapila wrote:
If I understood correctly, then your patch's main intention is to
correct the estimate of dead tuples, so that it can lead to Vacuum
cleaning the table/index which otherwise is not happening as per
configuration value (autovacuum_vacuum_threshold)
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-11-21 16:25:02 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Hmm. All callers of RecoveryInProgress() must be prepared to handle the case
that RecoveryInProgress() returns true, but the system is no longer in
recovery. No
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Dilip kumar dilip.ku...@huawei.com wrote:
On 20 November 2013 22:12, Sawada Masahiko Wrote
1. Patch applies cleanly to master HEAD.
2. No Compilation Warning.
3. It works as per the patch expectation.
Some Suggestion:
1. Add new WAL level (all) in
On 21.11.2013 17:08, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-11-21 16:25:02 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Hmm. All callers of RecoveryInProgress() must be prepared to handle the case
that RecoveryInProgress() returns true,
Vik == Vik Fearing vik.fear...@dalibo.com writes:
Vik I certainly want it. I do not have a copy of the SQL standard,
Vik but I have full faith in the Andrew Gierth's claim that this is
Vik part of it.
For reference, this is how I believe it matches up against the spec
(I'm working from the
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-11-21 09:08:05 -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
This code is in a very hot code path. Are we *sure* that the read
barrier is fast enough that we don't want to provide an alternate
function that only returns the
On 11/21/13, 2:35 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am feeling, so almost all people prefer
DROP TRIGGER [ IF EXISTS ] name ON table_name [ CASCADE | RESTRICT ];
Can we live with it?
Fine with me.
I think it helps if you consider IF EXISTS an attribute of the command,
not an attribute of the
On 11/20/13, 8:39 PM, Rodolfo Campero wrote:
2013/11/20 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net mailto:pete...@gmx.net
Updated patch
I can't apply the patch; maybe I'm doing something wrong?
It looks like you are not in the right directory.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On 2013-11-21 17:14:17 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 11/21/13, 2:35 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am feeling, so almost all people prefer
DROP TRIGGER [ IF EXISTS ] name ON table_name [ CASCADE | RESTRICT ];
Can we live with it?
Fine with me.
I think it helps if you consider
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:22 PM, David Rowley dgrowle...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not quite sure why nobody else seems to be complaining, but the changes
to type.h in this commit seems to have broken things little.
In the visual studios build I'm getting:
On 11/21/13, 6:15 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-11-20 15:05:17 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
That's what I had suggested to some people originally and the response
was, well, somewhat unenthusiastic. It's not that easy to assign them in
a meaningful automated manner. How do you automatically
On 2013-11-21 15:59:35 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
* Should HeapTupleHeaderXminFrozen also check for FrozenTransactionId?
It seems quite possible that people think they've delt with frozen
xmin entirely after checking, but they still might get
FrozenTransactionId back in a pg_upgraded
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Not that I can see, but it's not very future-proof. If libpq changes
its idea of what will provoke database-name expansion, this will again
be
Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com writes:
On 20 November 2013 22:46, Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
Tom == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Tom 1. Reinsert HEAD's prohibition against directly combining WITH
Tom ORDINALITY with a coldeflist (with a better error message
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.comwrote:
Bruce Momjian escribió:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:14:14PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 24.10.2013 23:07, Josh Berkus wrote:
What kind of overhead are we talking about here?
One extra WAL record
On 2013-11-21 14:40:36 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
But if the transaction would not have otherwise generated WAL (i.e. a
select that did not have to do any HOT pruning, or an update with zero rows
matching the where condition), doesn't it now have to flush and wait when
it would otherwise not?
On 2013-11-21 18:09:38 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2013-11-15 15:17:32 +0200, hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
But I'm not wedded to the idea if someone objects; a log message might
also be reasonable: LOG: huge TLB pages are not supported on this
platform,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:50 PM, David Johnston pol...@yahoo.com wrote:
Why is this not implemented? Is it considered inconvenient to use, or
difficult to implement. or not important enough, or some other reason?
I cannot answer why but I too would like to see this. I actually asked this
a
On 11/21/2013 11:04 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
Please find attached the latest patch for WITHIN GROUP. This patch is
after fixing the merge conflicts.
I have spent quite some time on this and the previous versions. Here is
my review, following the questions on the wiki.
This patch is in context
On 11/21/2013 10:55 PM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
On 21 November 2013 13:15, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi all
I have updatable security barrier views working for INSERT and DELETE,
so this might be a good chance to see whether the described approach is
acceptable in reality, not
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
So, with this patch we can do that:
ALTER TABLE foo
SET (ext.somext.do_replicate=true);
When 'ext' is the fixed prefix, 'somext' is the extension name,
'do_replicate' is the
extension option
Hello,
I may be totally missing something, but there seems to be no way
to create a COMMENT on a domain constraint. There is
COMMENT ON CONSTRAINT constraint_name ON table_name
but no such thing for domain constraints, which seems like a
weird omission.
I couldn't find any relevant
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
On 21.11.2013 17:08, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 2013-11-21 16:25:02 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Hmm. All callers of
Hello,
This is turning into a rather large thread and I have a simple question:
Is a work-around to this problem as simple as disabling streaming
replication and enabling log shipping instead?
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL
On 2013-11-21 12:39:54 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 11/21/2013 12:36 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hello,
This is turning into a rather large thread and I have a simple question:
Is a work-around to this problem as simple as disabling streaming
replication and enabling log shipping
Well, I happen to have some pieces of such a framework: the parts which
can automate spinning up arbitrarily complex groups of replicas and
doing failover between them. What we'd still need is:
a) a slightly better workload than pgbench
b) a way to compare and test databases for data
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
Are there any other changes you have pending for this..? Would be nice
to see the latest version which you've tested and which patches cleanly
against master... ;)
I just rebased now, please see attached. I had to pick new
On 2013-11-21 09:08:05 -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
This code is in a very hot code path. Are we *sure* that the read
barrier is fast enough that we don't want to provide an alternate
function that only returns the local flag? I don't know enough about
them to say either way.
A read barrier
On 2013-11-21 16:24:56 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
What about
huge_tlb_pages={off,try}
Or maybe
huge_tlb_pages={off,try,require}
I'd spell require as on, or at least accept that as a synonym.
That's off,try, on is what the patch currently implements, Abhijit just
was arguing for
On 2013-11-21 10:25:20 -0500, J Smith wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-11-19 15:20:01 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
Imo something the attached patch should be done. The description I came
up with is:
Fix Hot-Standby
On 2013-11-21 23:02:29 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 21.11.2013 22:53, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-11-21 12:51:17 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 11/21/2013 12:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
The problem is starting with hot_standby=on on a system with
recovery.conf present. It is independent
On 11/21/13, 3:29 PM, Elvis Pranskevichus wrote:
I may be totally missing something, but there seems to be no way
to create a COMMENT on a domain constraint. There is
COMMENT ON CONSTRAINT constraint_name ON table_name
but no such thing for domain constraints, which seems like a
weird
On 21 November 2013 13:15, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi all
I have updatable security barrier views working for INSERT and DELETE,
so this might be a good chance to see whether the described approach is
acceptable in reality, not just in theory.
I've been surprised by how
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Where are we on the remaining possible pushdowns for foreign data
wrappers, particularly the Postgres one? I know we do WHERE restriction
pushdowns in 9.3, but what about join and aggregate pushdowns? Is
anyone working on
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com writes:
Here what I have in mind is that:
a. In pg_dump or other internal utilities where we want to use this
feature, they should call PQenableStart() or some other API before
calling
I've committed this patch after some significant editorialization, but
leaving the use of TABLE( ... ) syntax in-place. If we decide that we
don't want to risk doing that, we can change to some other syntax later.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
2013/11/22 Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp:
2013/11/21 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us:
Where are we on the remaining possible pushdowns for foreign data
wrappers, particularly the Postgres one? I know we do WHERE restriction
pushdowns in 9.3, but what about join and aggregate pushdowns? Is
2013/11/22 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I know join pushdowns seem insignificant, but it helps to restrict what
data must be passed back because you would only pass back joined
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-11-19 15:20:01 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
Imo something the attached patch should be done. The description I came
up with is:
Fix Hot-Standby initialization of clog and subtrans.
G'day Andres.
This
On 11/21/2013 05:52 AM, David Rowley wrote:
I'm not quite sure why nobody else seems to be complaining, but the
changes to type.h in this commit seems to have broken things little.
In the visual studios build I'm getting:
src\interfaces\ecpg\preproc\preproc.y(84): error C2065: 'ET_FATAL' :
On 11/21/2013 04:39 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 11/21/13, 2:09 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
I wrote new styles for psql table borders.
http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql
This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting
for final presentation.
Do you
Hi,
While looking at the multixact truncation code (mail nearby), I've
noticed that there's a significant difference in the way multixact
members are accessed since fkey locks were introduced:
9.3 when heap_lock_tuple finds a XMAX_IS_MULTI tuple it executes
MultiXactIdWait() which in turn uses
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:42:32AM +0200, Karol Trzcionka wrote:
W dniu 04.10.2013 02:51, Robert Haas pisze:
Do you have a link to previous discussion on the mailing list?
Sorry, most of discussion was at IRC channel.
I'm not positive there's enough information available
at that stage, but
On 21.11.2013 22:53, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-11-21 12:51:17 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 11/21/2013 12:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
The problem is starting with hot_standby=on on a system with
recovery.conf present. It is independent of whether you use streaming
replication, archive based
2013-11-21 11:52 keltezéssel, David Rowley írta:
I'm not quite sure why nobody else seems to be complaining, but the changes to type.h in
this commit seems to have broken things little.
In the visual studios build I'm getting:
src\interfaces\ecpg\preproc\preproc.y(84): error C2065:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I don't think so - for one, pg_subtrans isn't really the problems with
that bug, for another, it won't cause missing files. Also, you're not
using replication, right?
Actually, this server is a master being
Maciej,
Thanks for feedback -- it's helpful to get a different perspective on this.
I used to work on a project storing large quantities of schema-less data,
initially using MongoDB, then Postgres with JSON, and eventually I
implemented BSON support for Postgres to get the best of both
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com writes:
Here what I have in mind is that:
a. In pg_dump or other internal utilities where we want to use this
feature, they should call PQenableStart() or some other API before
calling PQConnect() which will indicate that it wants to operate
as a
On 03.10.2013 00:14, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Ants Aasma a...@cybertec.at wrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Ants Aasma a...@cybertec.at wrote:
I haven't reviewed the code in as much
Piotr Marcinczyk escribió:
varlistentry
+ termliteral\ib replaceable
class=parameterfilename/replaceable [ replaceable
class=parameterquote_string/replaceable ] /literal/term
+ listitem
+ para
+ The literal\ib/ command appends content of file
On 21.11.2013 22:55, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2013-11-20 12:48:50 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 19.11.2013 16:22, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-11-19 15:20:01 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
Imo something the attached patch should be done. The description I came
g up with is:
Fix
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
It's still not this issue in that case, but I might have an idea... Do
you have hot_standby_feedback enabled?
Nope, hot_standby_feedback is set to its default setting which is off.
At any rate, I'm going to try and
Tom == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Tom Anyway, after further thought I've come up with an approach
Tom that's purely a syntactic transformation and so less likely to
Tom cause surprise: let's say that if we have TABLE() with a single
Tom argument, and no coldeflist either inside or
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:46:14AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I know join pushdowns seem insignificant, but it helps to restrict what
data must be passed back because you would only
Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk writes:
Tom == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Tom Anyway, after further thought I've come up with an approach
Tom that's purely a syntactic transformation and so less likely to
Tom cause surprise: let's say that if we have TABLE() with a single
2013/11/21 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us:
Where are we on the remaining possible pushdowns for foreign data
wrappers, particularly the Postgres one? I know we do WHERE restriction
pushdowns in 9.3, but what about join and aggregate pushdowns? Is
anyone working on those?
I know join
Where are we on the remaining possible pushdowns for foreign data
wrappers, particularly the Postgres one? I know we do WHERE restriction
pushdowns in 9.3, but what about join and aggregate pushdowns? Is
anyone working on those?
I know join pushdowns seem insignificant, but it helps to restrict
I should to appen list of new styles to doc. Style double6 doesnt exist,
because I renamed double5 to bold1 (and created second bold2)
I will update patch tomorrow - it will be in cf4
Regards
Pavel
Dne 21.11.2013 21:37 Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com napsal(a):
On 21 November 2013 21:15, Szymon
On 2013-11-21 11:54:58 -0500, J Smith wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I don't think so - for one, pg_subtrans isn't really the problems with
that bug, for another, it won't cause missing files. Also, you're not
using replication,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:37 PM, fabriziomello fabriziome...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2013-09-18 15:15:55 +0200, Bernd Helmle wrote:
On 2013-09-18 15:15:55 +0200, Bernd Helmle wrote:
--On 18. September 2013 13:52:29 +0200 Andres Freund
lt;andres@gt; wrote:
If you do ALTER TABLE ...
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
The argument elsewhere in this thread was that the reason for putting
this in the connection options was so
On 11/21/13, 2:09 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
I wrote new styles for psql table borders.
http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql
This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting
for final presentation.
Do you think so this feature is generally
So here is patch for 9.4
7 new line styles, 2 new border styles, \pset border autocomplete
Regards
Pavel
2013/11/21 Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com
On 21 November 2013 08:09, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I wrote new styles for psql table borders.
On 11/21/2013 12:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
No. Check
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20131120234141.GI18801%40awork2.anarazel.de
The problem is starting with hot_standby=on on a system with
recovery.conf present. It is independent of whether you use streaming
replication,
On 2013-11-21 12:51:17 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 11/21/2013 12:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
No. Check
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20131120234141.GI18801%40awork2.anarazel.de
The problem is starting with hot_standby=on on a system with
recovery.conf present. It is
On 2013-11-21 16:25:02 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Hmm. All callers of RecoveryInProgress() must be prepared to handle the case
that RecoveryInProgress() returns true, but the system is no longer in
recovery. No matter what locking we do in RecoveryInProgress(), the startup
process might
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
WRT performance: I agree that fixed-width identifiers are more
performant, that's why I went for them, but I am not sure it's that
important. The performance sensitive parts should all be done using the
internal
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2013-11-15 15:17:32 +0200, hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
But I'm not wedded to the idea if someone objects; a log message might
also be reasonable: LOG: huge TLB pages are not supported on this
platform, but huge_tlb_pages was 'on'
Put that way, I have to
Hi,
As promised I'm currently updating the patch. Some questions arose
during that:
* Should HeapTupleHeaderXminFrozen also check for FrozenTransactionId?
It seems quite possible that people think they've delt with frozen
xmin entirely after checking, but they still might get
Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp writes:
Right now, it performs on relation scan or join only. However, we will be
able to apply same concept on aggregation.
For example, an aggregation node on a foreign table scan is a good
candidate to push down because it can be replaced with a custom-
On 21 November 2013 20:20, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
So here is patch for 9.4
7 new line styles, 2 new border styles, \pset border autocomplete
Regards
Pavel
2013/11/21 Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com
On 21 November 2013 08:09, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
Hi,
Heikki's comments about StartupMultiXact() being executed too late in
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/528C9392.804%40vmware.com
made me look at how multixact truncation works, since that's where
SimpleLruTruncate() would trigger an error because of an unitialized
AK wrote
9.3 documentation says:
According to the standard, the column-list syntax should allow a list of
columns to be assigned from a single row-valued expression, such as a
sub-select:
UPDATE accounts SET (contact_last_name, contact_first_name) =
(SELECT last_name, first_name FROM
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I wrote new styles for psql table borders.
http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql
This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting for
final presentation.
great. hm, maybe we
Hi all
I have updatable security barrier views working for INSERT and DELETE,
so this might be a good chance to see whether the described approach is
acceptable in reality, not just in theory.
I've been surprised by how well it worked out. I actually landed up
removing a lot of the existing
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
As promised I'm currently updating the patch. Some questions arose
during that:
* Should HeapTupleHeaderXminFrozen also check for FrozenTransactionId?
It seems quite possible that people think they've delt with
Bruce Momjian escribió:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:14:14PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 24.10.2013 23:07, Josh Berkus wrote:
What kind of overhead are we talking about here?
One extra WAL record whenever a hint bit is set on a page, for the
first time after a checkpoint. In
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I know join pushdowns seem insignificant, but it helps to restrict what
data must be passed back because you would only pass back joined rows.
By 'insignificant' you mean
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2013-11-15 15:17:32 +0200, hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
But I'm not wedded to the idea if someone objects; a log message might
also be reasonable: LOG: huge TLB pages are not
On 30.09.2013 07:12, KONDO Mitsumasa wrote:
(2013/09/27 5:29), Peter Eisentraut wrote:
This patch no longer applies.
I will try to create this patch in next commit fest.
If you have nice idea, please send me!
A few thoughts on this:
1. DBT-2 uses a non-uniform distribution. You can use that
On 11/21/2013 12:36 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hello,
This is turning into a rather large thread and I have a simple question:
Is a work-around to this problem as simple as disabling streaming
replication and enabling log shipping instead?
Yes, and re-cloning the replica, in case it
On 21 November 2013 21:15, Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 November 2013 20:20, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
So here is patch for 9.4
7 new line styles, 2 new border styles, \pset border autocomplete
Regards
Pavel
2013/11/21 Szymon Guz
Hi,
On 2013-11-20 12:48:50 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 19.11.2013 16:22, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-11-19 15:20:01 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
Imo something the attached patch should be done. The description I came
g up with is:
Fix Hot-Standby initialization of clog and
On 2013-11-21 08:22:05 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
WRT performance: I agree that fixed-width identifiers are more
performant, that's why I went for them, but I am not sure it's that
important. The performance
David Johnston pol...@yahoo.com writes:
Tom Lane-2 wrote
We could conceivably say that we'll implicitly UNNEST() if the function
returns array, and not otherwise --- but that seems pretty inconsistent
and surprise-making to me.
The use-cases for putting a scalar array returning function
In master branch, server is not getting started with log level as debug5.
Simple steps to reproduce the problem:
a. initdb -D ..\..\Data
b. change log_min_messages = debug5 in postgresql.conf
c. start server (pg_ctl start -D ..\..\Data) -- server doesn't get started
Relevant message on server
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Piotr Marcinczyk escribió:
varlistentry
+ termliteral\ib replaceable
class=parameterfilename/replaceable [ replaceable
class=parameterquote_string/replaceable ] /literal/term
+ listitem
97 matches
Mail list logo
