Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
(2014/02/15 11:42), Tom Lane wrote: Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp writes: (2014/02/15 2:32), Tom Lane wrote: (BTW, narwhal is evidently not trying to build plpython. I wonder why not?) Due to *initializer element is not constant* error which also can be see on my old machine. Hmm,

Re: [HACKERS] Ctrl+C from sh can shut down daemonized PostgreSQL cluster

2014-02-15 Thread Hannu Krosing
On 02/15/2014 02:25 AM, Greg Stark wrote: On 14 Feb 2014 23:07, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: If this is, as it sounds to be, a Solaris shell bug, doesn't it affect other daemons too? This is simmering i never exactly followed but i think if the shell

Re: [HACKERS] Memory ordering issue in LWLockRelease, WakeupWaiters, WALInsertSlotRelease

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 04:20:17 +0100, Florian Pflug wrote: Another idea would be to do as you suggest and only mark the PGPROC pointers volatile, but to additionally add a check for queue corruption somewhere. We should be able to detect that - if we ever hit this issue, LWLockRelease should find a

Re: [HACKERS] Patch: show xid and xmin in pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_replication

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-14 23:03:43 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Christian Kruse christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On Wednesday 12 February 2014 11:14:56 Andres Freund wrote: But they do take up shared memory without really needing to. I personally don't find that too bad,

Re: [HACKERS] Recovery inconsistencies, standby much larger than primary

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-14 22:30:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-14 20:46:01 +, Greg Stark wrote: Going over this I think this is still a potential issue: On 31 Jan 2014 15:56, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: I am not sure that explains

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-12 14:11:10 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com writes: On 12/02/2014 19:19, Andres Freund wrote: On 2014-02-12 19:13:07 +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote: About PGDLLIMPORT , my build log is full of warning: ‘optarg’ redeclared without dllimport attribute:

[HACKERS] commit fest 2014-01 week 4 report

2014-02-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Last week: Status Summary. Needs Review: 47, Waiting on Author: 15, Ready for Committer: 12, Committed: 37, Returned with Feedback: 3, Rejected: 2. Total: 116. This week: Status Summary. Needs Review: 45, Waiting on Author: 13, Ready for Committer: 14, Committed: 38, Returned with Feedback: 4,

Re: [HACKERS] New option for pg_basebackup, to specify a different directory for pg_xlog

2014-02-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2/9/14, 11:16 PM, Haribabu Kommi wrote: I also felt a lot of work for little benefit but as of now I am not able to find an easier solution to handle this problem. can we handle the same later if it really requires? I think we leave everything as is. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing

[HACKERS] Display sequence belonging to table

2014-02-15 Thread Rugal Bernstein
Hi all: I just retrieved TODO list and find one item that refer to 'Display sequence owner'. Is there anyone working on it? I think I am interested in this. [ http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1228622212.10877.59.ca...@godzilla.local.scalefeather.com] -- Rugal Bernstein Java

Re: [HACKERS] [9.3 bug] disk space in pg_xlog increases during archive recovery

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-12 13:33:31 +0100, Andres Freund wrote: On 2014-02-12 21:23:54 +0900, MauMau wrote: Maybe we could consider in that direction, but there is a problem. Archive recovery slows down compared to 9.1, because of repeated restartpoints. Archive recovery should be as fast as possible,

Re: [HACKERS] Create function prototype as part of PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2014-01-15 00:41:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: This idea has appeared at least twice now, in http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1386301050.2743.17.ca...@vanquo.pezone.net and http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/52d25aa2.50...@2ndquadrant.com

Re: [HACKERS] Exposing currentTransactionWALVolume

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
Hi Simon, On 2014-01-14 17:12:35 +, Simon Riggs wrote: /* - * MarkCurrentTransactionIdLoggedIfAny + * ReportTransactionInsertedWAL * - * Remember that the current xid - if it is assigned - now has been wal logged. + * Remember that the current xid - if it is assigned - has now

Re: [HACKERS] New hook after raw parsing, before analyze

2014-02-15 Thread David Beck
2014.02.15. dátummal, 0:46 időpontban Greg Stark st...@mit.edu írta: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:16 PM, David Beck db...@starschema.net wrote: Another point I liked in mysql is the possibility to write info schema plugins:

Re: [HACKERS] CREATE FOREIGN TABLE ( ... LIKE ... )

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-01-31 18:16:18 +0100, Vik Fearing wrote: On 01/25/2014 06:25 AM, David Fetter wrote: Please find attached the next rev :) This version looks committable to me, so I am marking it as such. This doesn't contain a single regression test, I don't see how that's ok. Marking as waiting on

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest 2014-01 week 4 report

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2014-02-15 08:34:19 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 47, Waiting on Author: 15, Ready for Committer: 12, Committed: 37, Returned with Feedback: 3, Rejected: 2. Total: 116. This week: Status Summary. Needs Review: 45, Waiting on Author: 13, Ready for

Re: [HACKERS] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, Some quick review comments: On 2014-02-13 18:14:54 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: + /* + * EWT can be generated for all new tuple versions created by Update + * operation. Currently we do it when both the old and new tuple versions + * are on same page, because during

Re: [HACKERS] Create function prototype as part of PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1

2014-02-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2/15/14, 8:51 AM, Andres Freund wrote: Based on those comments and the lack of counter arguments after a month I am going to mark the patch as rejected. Actually, I was waiting for that PGDLLIMPORT thread to sort itself out before tackling this. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] Memory ordering issue in LWLockRelease, WakeupWaiters, WALInsertSlotRelease

2014-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: My current conclusion is that backporting barriers.h is by far the most reasonable way to go. The compiler problems have been ironed out by now... -1. IMO that code is still quite unproven, and what's more, the problem we're discussing here is

Re: [HACKERS] Create function prototype as part of PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1

2014-02-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 1/15/14, 12:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Meh. I don't think that extension authors are really going to appreciate changing from thou shalt declare all thy functions to thou shalt declare none of them. This patch does no such thing. If the code were such that it wouldn't matter whether a

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2.1 index-only scans : abnormal heap fetches after VACUUM FULL

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, *** end_heap_rewrite(RewriteState state) *** 281,286 --- 284,290 true); RelationOpenSmgr(state-rs_new_rel); + update_page_vm(state-rs_new_rel, state-rs_buffer, state-rs_blockno);

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-12 14:11:10 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com writes: from /usr/include/getopt.h extern char __declspec(dllimport) *optarg; /* argument associated with option */ Hm. All of our files that use getopt also

Re: [HACKERS] Memory ordering issue in LWLockRelease, WakeupWaiters, WALInsertSlotRelease

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 10:06:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: My current conclusion is that backporting barriers.h is by far the most reasonable way to go. The compiler problems have been ironed out by now... -1. IMO that code is still quite unproven, and

Re: [HACKERS] Create function prototype as part of PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1

2014-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On 1/15/14, 12:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Meh. I don't think that extension authors are really going to appreciate changing from thou shalt declare all thy functions to thou shalt declare none of them. This patch does no such thing. Yes it does; people

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 10:16:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-12 14:11:10 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com writes: from /usr/include/getopt.h extern char __declspec(dllimport) *optarg; /* argument associated with

Re: [HACKERS] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation

2014-02-15 Thread Amit Kapila
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Hi, Some quick review comments: Thanks for the review, I shall handle/reply to comments with the updated version in which I am planing to fix a bug (right now preparing a test to reproduce it) in this code. Bug: Tag

Re: [HACKERS] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 21:01:07 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: More importantly I don't think doing the compression on this level is that interesting. I know Heikki argued for it, but I think extending the bitmap that's computed for HOT to cover all columns and doing this on a column level sounds much

Re: [HACKERS] Create function prototype as part of PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1

2014-02-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2/15/14, 10:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On 1/15/14, 12:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Meh. I don't think that extension authors are really going to appreciate changing from thou shalt declare all thy functions to thou shalt declare none of them. This patch

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-15 10:16:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: The best thing probably is not to have the duplicate declarations on platforms that don't need 'em. Unfortunately, I seem to recall that the current coding was arrived at to forestall link problems on

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 10:59:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-15 10:16:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: The best thing probably is not to have the duplicate declarations on platforms that don't need 'em. Unfortunately, I seem to recall that the current

Re: [HACKERS] Problem with displaying wide tables in psql

2014-02-15 Thread Emre Hasegeli
Hi, This is my review about 3th version of the patch. It is an useful improvement in my opinion. It worked well on my environment. 2013-12-11 17:43:06, Sergey Muraviov sergey.k.murav...@gmail.com: It works in expanded mode when either format option is set to wrapped (\pset format wrapped), or

Re: [HACKERS] Memory ordering issue in LWLockRelease, WakeupWaiters, WALInsertSlotRelease

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 16:18:00 +0100, Andres Freund wrote: On 2014-02-15 10:06:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: My current conclusion is that backporting barriers.h is by far the most reasonable way to go. The compiler problems have been ironed out by

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-15 10:59:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: I don't have time right now to research it (have to go shovel snow), but I think that at least some of the issue was that we needed the externs when we force use of our src/port implementation. I think

Re: [HACKERS] Create function prototype as part of PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1

2014-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On 2/15/14, 10:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Yes it does; people who fail to remove their manual externs will get Windows-only build failures (or at least warnings; it's not very clear which declaration will win). The manual externs and the automatically

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 12:16:58 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-15 10:59:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: I don't have time right now to research it (have to go shovel snow), but I think that at least some of the issue was that we needed the externs when we

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2.1 index-only scans : abnormal heap fetches after VACUUM FULL

2014-02-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 04:16:40PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote: Hi, *** end_heap_rewrite(RewriteState state) *** 281,286 --- 284,290 true); RelationOpenSmgr(state-rs_new_rel); +

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2.1 index-only scans : abnormal heap fetches after VACUUM FULL

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 12:50:14 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 04:16:40PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote: Hi, *** end_heap_rewrite(RewriteState state) *** 281,286 --- 284,290 true);

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-15 18:21:56 +0100, Andres Freund wrote: On 2014-02-15 12:16:58 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Yeah, there are enough copies of that stuff that centralizing them sounds like a great idea. Call it pg_getopt.h, perhaps? Patch attached. I am not

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: Patch attached. Committed with some cosmetic adjustments --- thanks! I am not sure whether HAVE_GETOPT is the best condition to use, since it's set by configure by a link based check, same goes for HAVE_INT_OPTERR. The other choices would be

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 14:35:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: Patch attached. Committed with some cosmetic adjustments --- thanks! I am not sure whether HAVE_GETOPT is the best condition to use, since it's set by configure by a link based check, same goes

Re: [HACKERS] HBA files w/include support?

2014-02-15 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:10:48AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: The argument about wanting to assemble a pg_hba file from separately managed configuration pieces seems to have some merit, but the weak spot there is how do you define the search order? Or are you planning to just cross your fingers

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 12/02/2014 17:39, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-12 11:26:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Hm. So if we're giving up on the idea of ever getting rid of PGDLLIMPORT, we ought to actually remove that, so that the Cygwin build works more like the other

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 21:49:43 +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 12/02/2014 17:39, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-12 11:26:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Hm. So if we're giving up on the idea of ever getting rid of PGDLLIMPORT, we ought to actually remove that, so

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 15/02/2014 21:54, Andres Freund wrote: Please pull and retry, that already might fix it. The reason it's probably failing is the warnings about declspec you reported earlier. See 60ff2fdd9970ba29f5267317a5e7354d2658c1e5 Greetings, Andres Freund that is fine. there is a different one,

[HACKERS] OS X and ossp-uuid, next chapter

2014-02-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
We already know that the uuid-ossp extension doesn't build OS X unless a small patch is applied. This has now gotten slightly worse after the Autoconf upgrade, because it will now fail if a header is present but cannot be compiled. (Previous versions would only warn. This is part of a

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 22:11:37 +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 15/02/2014 21:54, Andres Freund wrote: Please pull and retry, that already might fix it. The reason it's probably failing is the warnings about declspec you reported earlier. See 60ff2fdd9970ba29f5267317a5e7354d2658c1e5 Greetings,

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-15 22:11:37 +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote: ../../src/timezone/localtime.o ../../src/timezone/strftime.o ../../src/timezone/pgtz.o ../../src/port/libpgport_srv.a ../../src/common/libpgcommon_srv.a -lintl -lssl -lcrypto -lcrypt -lldap -o

Re: [HACKERS] gaussian distribution pgbench

2014-02-15 Thread Fabien COELHO
Gaussian Pgbench v6 patch by Mitsumasa KONDO review patch v7. * The purpose of the patch is to allow a pgbench script to draw from normally distributed or exponentially distributed integer values instead of uniformly distributed. This is a valuable contribution to enable pgbench to

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 17:26:30 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-15 22:11:37 +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote: ../../src/timezone/localtime.o ../../src/timezone/strftime.o ../../src/timezone/pgtz.o ../../src/port/libpgport_srv.a

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com writes: 32 $ grep -rH in6addr_any * cygwin/in6.h:extern const struct in6_addr in6addr_any; cygwin/version.h: in6addr_any, in6addr_loopback. So how come there's a declspec on the getopt.h variables, but not this one?

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-15 17:26:30 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: The interesting question here is why it used to work. There is no extern for in6addr_any in our code, so there must have been a declaration of that constant in some system header. Which one, and what

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 15/02/2014 23:37, Andres Freund wrote: On 2014-02-15 17:26:30 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-15 22:11:37 +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote: ../../src/timezone/localtime.o ../../src/timezone/strftime.o ../../src/timezone/pgtz.o

Re: [HACKERS] Changeset Extraction v7.6.1

2014-02-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: [ new patches ] 0001 already needs minor + * copied stuff from tuptoaster.c. Perhaps there should be toast_internal.h? Yes, please. If you can submit a separate patch creating this file and relocating this stuff

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 17:48:00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com writes: 32 $ grep -rH in6addr_any * cygwin/in6.h:extern const struct in6_addr in6addr_any; cygwin/version.h: in6addr_any, in6addr_loopback. So how come there's a declspec on the getopt.h

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: It might be that ipv6 never worked for mingw and cygwin, and in6addr_any just resolved to some magic thunk --auto-import created... Yeah, it would not be surprising if this exercise is exposing bugs we didn't even know we had.

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 18:26:46 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: It might be that ipv6 never worked for mingw and cygwin, and in6addr_any just resolved to some magic thunk --auto-import created... Yeah, it would not be surprising if this exercise is exposing bugs

Re: [HACKERS] Changeset Extraction v7.6.1

2014-02-15 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-02-15 17:29:04 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: [ new patches ] 0001 already needs minor Hm? If there are conflicts, I'll push/send a rebased tomorrow or monday. +* the transaction's invalidations. This

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Relocation of tablespaces in pg_basebackup

2014-02-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
I've been working on your patch. Attached is a version I'd be happy to commit. Please check that it's okay with you. I rewrote the option argument parsing logic a little bit to be more clear and provide more specific error messages. I reinstated the requirement that both old and new directory

Re: [HACKERS] New hook after raw parsing, before analyze

2014-02-15 Thread Greg Stark
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 2:06 PM, David Beck db...@starschema.net wrote: - when the query arrives a smart rewrite would know 1) what tables are local 2) what tables need new catalog entries 3) what can be joined on the other side - the rewriter would potentially add SQL statements in the

Re: [HACKERS] old warning in docs

2014-02-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: I have created the attached patch which removes many of the pre-8.0 references, and trims some of the 8.1-8.3 references. There are probably some of these that should be kept, but it is easier to show you all the

Re: [HACKERS] old warning in docs

2014-02-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 07:19:46PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: I have created the attached patch which removes many of the pre-8.0 references, and trims some of the 8.1-8.3 references. There are probably some of these

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2.1 index-only scans : abnormal heap fetches after VACUUM FULL

2014-02-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 07:08:40PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote: Can you be more specific about the cluster.c idea? I see copy_heap_data() in cluster.c calling HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() with a 'buf' just like the code I am working in. Yes, it does. But in contrast to your patch it does so

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
(2014/02/15 2:32), Tom Lane wrote: I wrote: Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp writes: One thing I'm wondering about is that plperl is linking perlxx.lib not libperlxx.a. I made a patch following plpython and it also works here. Is it worth trying? I hadn't noticed that part of plpython's