2015-05-29 9:53 GMT+02:00 Jeevan Chalke jeevan.cha...@gmail.com:
Pavel, will it be good if you separately submit the
bugfix: incomplete implementation of errhidecontext
patch in this commitfest?
ok, I'll do it
Pavel
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-29 10:40 GMT+02:00 Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-05-29 9:42 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
1. VS requires relatively new MS Windows - problem for people with Ms Win 7
and older
Really, I use Win 2k8 stuff and Win7 quite a lot.
2. After installation you have to find and apply some critical fixes - some
is bad documented.
2015-05-29 9:28 GMT+02:00 Jeevan Chalke jeevan.cha...@gmail.com:
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: not tested
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:not
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
I have to leave shortly, so I'll look at the initdb cleanup tomorrow.
Here's a revision of that patch that's more along the lines of what you
committed.
Will look at that
Pavel, will it be good if you separately submit the
bugfix: incomplete implementation of errhidecontext
patch in this commitfest?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Speaking of which, could somebody test that the committed patch does
what it's supposed to on Windows? You were worried upthread about
whether the tests for symlinks (aka junction points) behaved correctly,
and I have no
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-29 8:20 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info:
Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com a écrit
:
Hi
I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Speaking of which, could somebody test that the committed patch does
what it's supposed to on Windows? You were worried upthread about
whether the
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alexander Korotkov a.korot...@postgrespro.ru writes:
Could we address both this problems by denying changing existing
commutators and negator? ISTM that setting absent commutator and negator
is
quite enough for ALTER
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-29 9:42 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
1. VS requires relatively new MS Windows - problem for people with Ms
Win 7
and older
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi
I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due
2015-05-29 10:40 GMT+02:00 Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-05-29 9:42 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
1. VS requires relatively
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: not tested
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:not tested
I agree with Peter that We don't tab-complete everything we possibly
2015-05-29 9:42 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
1. VS requires relatively new MS Windows - problem for people with Ms
Win 7
and older
Really, I use Win 2k8 stuff and Win7 quite a lot.
On Win 7 you have to search
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi
I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due deployment - It
doesn't helps with MS Windows. Installing necessary software
2015-05-29 10:37 GMT+02:00 Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-05-29 8:20 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info:
Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com a
écrit
:
Hi
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-29 10:37 GMT+02:00 Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-05-29 8:20 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info:
Le
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi
I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due deployment - It
doesn't helps with MS Windows. Installing necessary software
2015-05-29 8:54 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Hi
I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due
FWIW, I don't mind which one we put in core and which one we put out of
core. But I like Joshua's idea of getting rid of contribs and pushing them
out as any other extensions.
Hmmm.
I like the contrib directory as a living example of how to do an
extension directly available in the source
Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi
I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due deployment - It
doesn't helps with MS Windows. Installing necessary software for
compilation there is terrible.
I agree it's hard to compile an extension on
2015-05-29 8:20 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info:
Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Hi
I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due deployment -
It doesn't helps with MS Windows. Installing necessary software for
Hi
I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due deployment - It
doesn't helps with MS Windows. Installing necessary software for
compilation there is terrible.
Regards
Pavel
2015-05-28 18:19 GMT+02:00 Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com:
Hello,
This is a topic that has
Le 29 mai 2015 8:01 AM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr a écrit :
FWIW, I don't mind which one we put in core and which one we put out of
core. But I like Joshua's idea of getting rid of contribs and pushing
them
out as any other extensions.
Hmmm.
I like the contrib directory as a
Re: Robert Haas 2015-05-29
ca+tgmozzdjn38tfqydgagj-ap+zkrqsrgbq4eu_zrefryk+...@mail.gmail.com
FTR: Robert, you have been a Samurai on this issue. Our many thanks.
Thanks! I really appreciate the kind words.
I'm still watching with admiration. This list of steps-to-reproduce is
the longest
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
This concerns a thinko in unique index inference. See the commit
message for full details.
It seems I missed a required defensive measure here. Attached patch
adds it, too.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From
Re: Tom Lane 2015-05-28 5740.1432849...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Here's an updated patch for the fsync problem(s).
I've committed this after some mostly-cosmetic rearrangements.
Fwiw, I can confirm that the problem is fixed for 9.5. The regression
tests
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Test-3 - Symlinks in pg_tblspc.
1. Create couple of tablespaces which creates symlinks
in pg_tblspc
2. Crash the server
3.
Done
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/5/257/
2015-05-29 9:56 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
2015-05-29 9:53 GMT+02:00 Jeevan Chalke jeevan.cha...@gmail.com:
Pavel, will it be good if you separately submit the
bugfix: incomplete implementation of errhidecontext
patch in
2015-05-29 11:02 GMT+02:00 Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-05-29 10:37 GMT+02:00 Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
A. Most obviously, we should fix pg_upgrade so that it installs
chkpnt_oldstMulti instead of chkpnt_nxtmulti into datfrozenxid, so
that we stop creating new instances of this problem. That won't get
us out of the hole
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Test-3 - Symlinks in pg_tblspc.
1. Create couple of
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
So I think we ought to fix xideqint4 to be marked leakproof and then
add this test. That would only be in HEAD though since it'd require
an initdb. Any objections?
FWIW, this makes sense.
Is there a reason to believe that a
built-in
On 05/28/2015 11:01 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
Also, removing a feature is a regression, and someone is always bound to
complain...
We aren't removing any features. These are all items that are NOT
installed or functional by default.
Sincerely,
JD
--
The most kicking donkey PostgreSQL
On 05/28/2015 11:08 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hi
I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due deployment -
It doesn't helps with MS Windows. Installing necessary software for
compilation there is terrible.
Anyone who is building for Windows won't have that problem. They already
Thomas Munro thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
B. We need to change find_multixact_start() to fail softly.
Here is an experimental WIP patch that changes StartupMultiXact and
SetMultiXactIdLimit to find the oldest
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Thomas Munro thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
B. We need to change find_multixact_start() to fail softly.
Here is an experimental WIP patch that
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Naoya Anzai nao-an...@xc.jp.nec.com
wrote:
2. Page visibility rate of each table
There is no way to know how many page-bits are them of each tables stored
in their visibility maps. If we can show this information, then we will be
able to guess vacuum overhead
On 5/28/15 10:15 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
I was a puzzled by src/backend/utils/fmgr/README and fmgr.h's
descriptions of fcinfo-flinfo-fn_extra (FmgrInfo.fn_extra) as they
seem to conflict with actual usage.
The docs suggest that fl_extra is for the use of function call handlers,
but in
One of the annoying inconsistencies between emacs and pgindent is that
emacs refuses to offset a block following a case label, while pgindent
does. Is there anything we can do to induce emacs to do what pgindent does?
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Just for the record: a minor nit I noticed yesterday.
-- Abhijit
From 07353c86483f7e26d44a9bbe94b32315537cee73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 23:15:15 +0530
Subject: The file mode is ignored without O_CREAT, so set it to 0
---
On 2015-05-29 13:37:40 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
One of the annoying inconsistencies between emacs and pgindent is that emacs
refuses to offset a block following a case label, while pgindent does. Is
there anything we can do to induce emacs to do what pgindent does?
Are you using the logic
On 05/29/2015 01:49 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-29 13:37:40 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
One of the annoying inconsistencies between emacs and pgindent is that emacs
refuses to offset a block following a case label, while pgindent does. Is
there anything we can do to induce emacs to do
On 05/29/2015 10:45 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
Andres,
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
On 2015-05-29 10:15:56 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
pg_drop_replication_slot() can be a time-critical function when the
master is running out of disk space because the replica is falling
behind.
Hi,
I think we should postpone next week's release. I have been hard at
work on the multixact-related bugs that were reported in 9.4.2 and
9.3.7, and the subsequent bugs found by code-reading, but getting them
all fixed by Monday doesn't seem realistic. Such fixes should have
careful review,
On 05/29/2015 11:07 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-29 10:53:30 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 05/29/2015 10:45 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
So, here's they scenario:
1. you're almost out of disk space due to a replica falling behind, like
down to 16mb left. Or maybe you are out of disk
Hackers,
pg_drop_replication_slot() can be a time-critical function when the
master is running out of disk space because the replica is falling
behind. So I was a little startled by this:
cio=# select
pg_drop_replication_slot('bdr_24577_6147720645156311471_1_25383__');
ERROR: replication slot
At 2015-05-29 13:14:18 -0400, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Pushed with minor revisions.
Thanks, looks good.
Since we're only logging the failures anyway, I think it is reasonable
to log a complaint for any unwritable file in the data directory.
Sounds reasonable, patch attached. ETXTBSY has
Andres,
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
On 2015-05-29 10:15:56 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
pg_drop_replication_slot() can be a time-critical function when the
master is running out of disk space because the replica is falling
behind.
I don't buy this argument. The same is true
On 2015-05-29 13:49:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-29 13:14:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
As I mentioned yesterday, I'm not really on board with ignoring EACCES,
except for the directories-on-Windows
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
On 2015-05-29 13:49:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
That sounds like a potentially nontrivial amount of repetitive log bleat
after every crash start? One which the user can't really stop?
Why can't the user stop it?
Because it makes a good
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I think we should postpone next week's release. I have been hard at
work on the multixact-related bugs that were reported in 9.4.2 and
9.3.7, and the subsequent bugs found by code-reading, but getting them
all fixed by Monday doesn't seem
Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
At 2015-05-28 17:37:16 -0400, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I have to leave shortly, so I'll look at the initdb cleanup tomorrow.
Here's a revision of that patch that's more along the lines of what you
committed.
Pushed with minor revisions.
It
On 2015-05-29 13:14:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
As I mentioned yesterday, I'm not really on board with ignoring EACCES,
except for the directories-on-Windows case. Since we're only logging
the failures anyway, I think it is reasonable to log a
* Josh Berkus (j...@agliodbs.com) wrote:
1. you're almost out of disk space due to a replica falling behind, like
down to 16mb left. Or maybe you are out of disk space.
This right here is a real issue. What I'd personally like to see is an
option which says you have X GB of disk space. Once
On 2015-05-29 10:53:30 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 05/29/2015 10:45 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
So, here's they scenario:
1. you're almost out of disk space due to a replica falling behind, like
down to 16mb left. Or maybe you are out of disk space.
2. You need to drop the laggy
On 2015-05-29 14:15:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-29 13:49:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Why can't the user stop it?
Because it makes a good amount of sense to have e.g. certificates not
owned by postgres and not writeable? You don't
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-29 13:14:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
As I mentioned yesterday, I'm not really on board with ignoring EACCES,
except for the directories-on-Windows case. Since we're only logging
the failures
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-29 13:49:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Why can't the user stop it?
Because it makes a good amount of sense to have e.g. certificates not
owned by postgres and not writeable? You don't necessarily want to
symlink them somewhere else, because
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info
wrote:
Le 29 mai 2015 8:01 AM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr a écrit :
FWIW, I don't mind which one we put in core and which one we put out of
core. But I like Joshua's idea of getting rid of contribs and
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
How is this measurably worse than trying to truncate a log table that
has grown too large? That's often harder to fight actually, because
there's dozens of other processes that might be using the relation? In
one case you don't have wait ordering,
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 02:02:43PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Hi,
I think we should postpone next week's release. I have been hard at
work on the multixact-related bugs that were reported in 9.4.2 and
9.3.7, and the subsequent bugs found by code-reading, but getting them
all fixed by Monday
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 02:54:31PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I think we should postpone next week's release. I have been hard at
work on the multixact-related bugs that were reported in 9.4.2 and
9.3.7, and the subsequent bugs found by
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr wrote:
FWIW, I don't mind which one we put in core and which one we put out of
core. But I like Joshua's idea of getting rid of contribs and pushing them
out as any other extensions.
Hmmm.
I like the contrib directory
On 05/29/2015 11:01 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Josh Berkus (j...@agliodbs.com) wrote:
1. you're almost out of disk space due to a replica falling behind, like
down to 16mb left. Or maybe you are out of disk space.
This right here is a real issue. What I'd personally like to see is an
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Well, that module has already been rewritten once (which proves that
there's an audience out there for it). Perhaps somebody will rewrite it
again to support a non-hardwired set of ranges. Now that we have the
concept of an
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 05:37:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Do we need release notes for an alpha? Once I do the release notes, it
is possible to miss subtle changes in the code that aren't mentioned in
commit messages.
If the commit message isn't
On 2015-05-29 18:02:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, I think we ought to take at least a few weeks to try to do a bit
of code review and clean up what we can from the open items list.
Why? A large portion of the input required to go from beta towards a
release is from actual users. To see
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-05-30 10:41:01 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Just saw what looks
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
On 2015-05-29 18:02:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, I think we ought to take at least a few weeks to try to do a bit
of code review and clean up what we can from the open items list.
Why? A large portion of the input required to go from beta
Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com writes:
The problem here is that these ranges are controlled by a
decentralized patchwork of national standards bodies, and the ranges
are always subject to revision. I think that it's egregious that
contrib/isn imagines it can track that with a static array.
This is distilled down from a performance regression problem that came
past on IRC earlier today:
create table t1 (a integer, b integer, c integer, primary key (a,b,c));
create table t2 (k2 integer, a integer, primary key (k2,a));
create table t3 (k3 integer, b integer, primary key (k3,b));
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
It made us realize that extensions that create types
that are physically equivalent to int8 or float8 were broken when we made
those types potentially pass-by-value; we had to add a CREATE TYPE option
to allow that to still
On 05/29/2015 02:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com writes:
The problem here is that these ranges are controlled by a
decentralized patchwork of national standards bodies, and the ranges
are always subject to revision. I think that it's egregious that
contrib/isn imagines
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Just saw what looks like a report of this issue on 9.2.
https://github.com/wal-e/wal-e/issues/177
Urk. That looks awfully similar, but I don't think any of the code
that is affected here exists in 9.2, or that any of the
On 2015-05-30 10:55:30 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
That's the error message, but then further down:
Ooops.
I have confirmed that directory pg_multixact/members does not
existing in the restored data directory.
I can see this directory and the file if i restore a few days old
backup. I have
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I'm personally kind of astonished that we're even thinking about beta
so soon. I mean, we at least need to go through the stuff listed
here, I think:
On 2015-05-30 10:41:01 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Just saw what looks like a report of this issue on 9.2.
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Just saw what looks like a report of this issue on 9.2.
https://github.com/wal-e/wal-e/issues/177
Urk. That looks awfully similar, but I don't
Hi,
while looking at this post from pgsql-performance about plan changes
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20150529095117.gb15...@hjp.at
I noticed that initial_cost_nestloop() does this in (9.1, mentioned in
the pgsql-performance post uses the same logic):
if (jointype ==
On 2015-05-29 15:49:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I think we need to step back and look at the brain power required to
unravel the mess we have made regarding multi-xact and fixes. (I bet
few people can even remember which multi-xact fixes went into which
releases --- I can't.) Instead of
On 05/30/15 01:20, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Notice the cost - it's way lover than the previous plan (9.2 vs
~111k), yet this plan was not chosen. So either the change broke
something (e.g. by violating some optimizer assumption), or maybe
there's a bug somewhere else ...
After a bit more
On 5/28/15 9:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Naoya Anzai nao-an...@xc.jp.nec.com writes:
In my much experience up until now,I have an idea that we can add
2 new vacuum statistics into pg_stat_xxx_tables.
Adding new stats in that way requires adding per-table counters, which
bloat the statistics files
On 2015-05-29 21:30:57 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
It occurs to me that there's no good reason for vacuum-derived stats to be
in the stats file; it's not like users run vacuum anywhere near as often as
other commands. It's stats could be kept in pg_class; we're already keeping
things like
Does anyone know what the difference between the
session_replication_role settings of 'origin' vs 'local' is supposed to
be? AFAICT, the code treats them the same and has done since this
feature was initially introduced.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
It won't fix the fact that pg_upgrade is putting
a wrong value into everybody's datminmxid field, which should really
be addressed too, but I've been working on this for about three days
virtually non-stop and I don't
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-05-29 18:02:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, I think we ought to take at least a few weeks to try to do a bit
of code review and clean up what we can from the open items list.
Why? A large portion of the input
It appears to be an omission that ALTER TABLE ... ENABLE TRIGGER and
similar commands don't allow acting on views, even though we now have
triggers on views.
Similarly, the ALTER TABLE ... ENABLE RULE commands only allow acting on
tables, even though rules can also exist on views and materialized
Andres Freund wrote:
I considered for a second whether the solution for that could be to not
truncate while inconsistent - but I think that doesn't solve anything as
then we can end up with directories where every single offsets/member
file exists.
Hang on a minute. We don't need to scan
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I think we need to step back and look at the brain power required to
unravel the mess we have made regarding multi-xact and fixes. (I bet
few people can even remember which multi-xact fixes went into which
releases --- I can't.) Instead of working on actual features, we
On May 29, 2015 8:56:40 PM PDT, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de
wrote:
On 2015-05-29 18:02:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, I think we ought to take at least a few weeks to try to do a
bit
of code review and clean up
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-05-29 15:08:11 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It seems pretty clear that we can't effectively determine anything
about member wraparound until the cluster is consistent.
I wonder if this doesn't actually hints at a
Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-29 21:30:57 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
It occurs to me that there's no good reason for vacuum-derived stats to be
in the stats file; it's not like users run vacuum anywhere near as often as
other commands. It's stats could be kept in pg_class; we're already
On 2015-05-29 15:08:11 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It seems pretty clear that we can't effectively determine anything
about member wraparound until the cluster is consistent.
I wonder if this doesn't actually hints at a bigger problem. Currently,
to determine where we need to truncate
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-05-29 15:08:11 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It seems pretty clear that we can't effectively determine anything
about member wraparound until the cluster is consistent.
I wonder if this doesn't actually hints at a
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
Why? A large portion of the input required to go from beta towards a
release is from actual users. To see when things break, what confuses
them and such.
I have two concerns:
On May 29, 2015 9:08:07 PM PDT, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I think your position is completely nuts.
Yeehaa.
The GROUPING SETS code is
desperately in need of testing. The custom-plan code is desperately
in need of fixing and testing. The multixact code is desperately
in need of
Hi,
On 2015-05-29 10:15:56 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
pg_drop_replication_slot() can be a time-critical function when the
master is running out of disk space because the replica is falling
behind.
I don't buy this argument. The same is true for DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE,
DROP DATABASE etc.
I mean,
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
I just caution that we appreciate PGCon coming up and that we do our
best to avoid running into a case where we have to push it further due
to everyone being at the conference.
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
