On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:44:39AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> daveg writes:
> > Here is the update: the problem happens with vacuum full alone, no reindex
> > is needed to trigger it. I updated the script to avoid reindexing after
> > vacuum. Over the past two days there are still many ocurrances of
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 17:29 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > heap_insert() calls CheckForSerializableConflictIn(), which checks if
> > there is a predicate lock on the whole relation, or on the page we're
> > inserting to. It does not check for tuple-level locks, becaus
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 13:41 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I took another look at v2 of my lazy vxid locks patch and realized
> that it was pretty flaky in a couple of different ways. Here's a
> version that I think is a bit more robust, but considering the extent
> of the revisions, it probably need
On 07/25/2011 12:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
On 07/25/2011 10:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
What is features.h, and have its authors read the POSIX standard?
AFAICS they have no business defining this symbol.
[andrew@emma ~]$ rpm -q -f /usr/include/features.h
glibc-head
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Excerpts from Dave Page's message of sáb jul 30 15:32:03 -0400 2011:
>> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > I think you had better plan on incorporating GNU readline into installer
>> > builds for Lion.
>>
>> Unfortunately
Excerpts from Dave Page's message of sáb jul 30 15:32:03 -0400 2011:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think you had better plan on incorporating GNU readline into installer
> > builds for Lion.
>
> Unfortunately the licence makes that a non-starter.
A fixed version of lib
daveg writes:
> Here is the update: the problem happens with vacuum full alone, no reindex
> is needed to trigger it. I updated the script to avoid reindexing after
> vacuum. Over the past two days there are still many ocurrances of this
> error coincident with the vacuum.
Well, that jives with t
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:31:31PM -0700, daveg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:45:01PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > REINDEX. My guess is that this is happening either right around the
> > time the VACUUM FULL commits or right around the time the REINDEX
> > commits. It'd be helpful to know
