On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:31:31PM -0700, daveg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:45:01PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > REINDEX.  My guess is that this is happening either right around the
> > time the VACUUM FULL commits or right around the time the REINDEX
> > commits.  It'd be helpful to know which, if you can figure it out.
> 
> I'll update my vacuum script to skip reindexes after vacuum full for 9.0
> servers and see if that makes the problem go away. Thanks for reminding
> me that they are not needed. However, I suspect it is the vacuum, not the
> reindex causing the problem. I'll update when I know.

Here is the update: the problem happens with vacuum full alone, no reindex
is needed to trigger it. I updated the script to avoid reindexing after
vacuum. Over the past two days there are still many ocurrances of this
error coincident with the vacuum.

-dg

-- 
David Gould       da...@sonic.net      510 536 1443    510 282 0869
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to