On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I am of strong opinion that concat should be shallow by default. Again it's
how jquery works by default, it's how python's dict.update works and you can
find this behavior in other languages as well when dealing with
Hello Joshua,
My 0.02 €:
Alright, per previous discussions I went through the backup.sgml page. I have
gone thoroughly through:
sql dump
pg_dump
pg_restore
handling large databases
I removed file based backups
I strongly disagree:
The section is interesting at least for the arguments
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:55:11PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
I think part of that is saying no more efficiently, upfront. Which is
why I really want the triage step.
a) It's much better for the project to not have
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
On 5/19/15 9:19 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
We could add a second parameter to the current functions:
allow_own_pid DEFAULT false. To me that seems better than an
entirely separate set of functions.
On 5/20/15 1:40 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
On 5/19/15 9:19 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
We could add a second parameter to the current functions:
allow_own_pid DEFAULT false. To me that seems better than an
entirely separate set of functions.
+1 to add a second parameter to
On Monday 18 May 2015 10:21:10 you wrote:
difficulty of updating existing cached plans
Could you specify more precisely about some caches we talking about? PREPARE
working correctly:
CREATE TABLE test_ints(i int4);
CREATE TABLE
CREATE INDEX idx ON test_ints(i);
CREATE INDEX
set
On 19 May 2015 at 21:57, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
It's not clear to me how a single INSERT could cause two or more UPDATEs.
CREATE TABLE mytable (
c1 int NOT NULL,
c2 int NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (c1),
UNIQUE (c2)
);
INSERT INTO mytable (c1, c2) (10, 20);
INSERT
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 18, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Volker Aßmann volker.assm...@gmail.com
wrote:
I know these measures won't protect against an experienced attacker who
gains root access, but hope it slows them down sufficiently so the
Hi,
The attached patch fixes a typo in a comment in tablecmds.c.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
index 33ea387..5114e6f 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
@@ -2342,7
On 19 May 2015 at 19:18, Jan de Visser j...@de-visser.net wrote:
On May 19, 2015 09:31:32 PM Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
Jan de Visser wrote:
Well, one could argue that it *is* their problem, as they should be
using
the standard Postgres way for placeholders, which is $1, $2, $3...
On 20 May 2015 at 03:13, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:55:11PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de
wrote:
I think part of that is saying no more efficiently, upfront. Which is
why I really want the
Hi,
For the user created indexes in PostgreSQL 8.3.6, I would like to
know in which table (eg: pg_tablename) the index-tuple-count and
index-page-count meta-data statistics are stored.
Regards and Thanks,
Srinivas Karthik
Hi, Hackers!
Attached is a patch against master to generalize the JSON-producing
functions in utils/adt/json.c and to provide a set of callbacks which can
be overridden the same way that is already provided for *parsing* JSON.
The motivation behind this to be able to produce specially-crafted
While reading the commit- 5aa23504 for Replication Progress
Tracking, I came across few issues which I would like to share.
1. catalogs.sgml
+ row
+ entrystructfieldlocal_lsn/structfield/entry
+
entrytypepg_lsn/type/entry
+ entry/entry
+ entryThis node's LSN that at
+
David Steele da...@pgmasters.net writes:
+1. I agree that cancelling/killing your own process should not be the
default behavior.
I think backwards compatibility probably trumps that argument. I have
no objection to providing a different call that behaves this way, but
changing the behavior
Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com writes:
On 5/19/15 9:19 PM, FabrÃzio de Royes Mello wrote:
+1 to add a second parameter to current functions.
Instead of allow_own_pid, I went with skip_own_pid. I have the function
still returning true even when it skips it's own PID... that seems a bit
On 05/20/2015 06:55 AM, Euler Taveira wrote:
Attached is a small typo.
Fixed, thanks.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr
oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de wrote:
Hi, Hackers!
Attached is a patch against master to generalize the JSON-producing
functions in utils/adt/json.c and to provide a set of callbacks which can be
overridden the same way that is already
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Hi,
I've, for a while, pondered whether we couldn't find a easier way than
CSN to make snapshots cheaper as GetSnapshotData() very frequently is
one of the top profile entries. Especially on bigger servers, where the
On 05/20/2015 12:40 PM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
The attached patch fixes a typo in a comment in tablecmds.c.
Fixed, along with dozens more similar typos I found with some grepping.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On 05/20/2015 04:14 PM, Srinivas Karthik V wrote:
Hi,
For the user created indexes in PostgreSQL 8.3.6, I would like to
know in which table (eg: pg_tablename) the index-tuple-count and
index-page-count meta-data statistics are stored.
pg_class.reltuples and pg_class.relpages.
(I'm sure
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
To do it before every minor release would require re-indenting HEAD
as well (since the whole point is to keep HEAD and the back branches
consistent). I think we'd get too much push-back from developers
whose pending patches
On 05/20/2015 09:16 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote:
Hi, Hackers!
Attached is a patch against master to generalize the JSON-producing
functions in utils/adt/json.c and to provide a set of callbacks which
can be overridden the same way that is already provided for *parsing*
JSON.
The
On 20 May 2015 at 17:54, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-05-20 17:44:05 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
On 8 May 2015 at 16:03, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
So I've committed the patch yesterday evening. I'm pretty sure there'll
be some more minor things to change. But
On 05/20/2015 01:20 AM, Volker Aßmann wrote:
So, in the interests of trying to get you to understand why your
proposal met with a negative response, and to improve future proposals:
You don't seem to have much trust in your other authentication
mechanisms and seem to know our environment quite
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Bruno Harbulot br...@distributedmatter.net
wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:50 PM, David G. Johnston
david.g.johns...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Bruno Harbulot
br...@distributedmatter.net wrote:
While I can imagine a Java
Hi,
I changed typos error. and attached patch for this.
Thanks you.
I only changed comments only
typos.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 2015-05-20 17:44:05 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
On 8 May 2015 at 16:03, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
So I've committed the patch yesterday evening. I'm pretty sure there'll
be some more minor things to change. But overall I feel good about the
current state.
It'd be quite
Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi writes:
Thanks, committed. Except for this one:
- * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be seeked.
+ * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be sought.
It's true that the past tense of seek is sought, but it feels a bit
weird to me in this context. This is a
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Bruno Harbulot
br...@distributedmatter.net wrote:
Users of question mark operators are already admitting their application and
code isn't portable (since they are specific to PostgreSQL and its
extensions). The problem has more to do with how the other tools
On 2015-05-20 18:09:05 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 17:54, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-05-20 17:44:05 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
The docs say Note that exclusion constraints are not supported with
ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE.
But I get the following error
On 5/20/15 5:21 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
That's a reasonable argument. So +1 to protocol from me.
To satisfy Tom, I think this would need to have two modes: one where the
session can never be reset, for ultra security, and
On 8 May 2015 at 16:03, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
So I've committed the patch yesterday evening. I'm pretty sure there'll
be some more minor things to change. But overall I feel good about the
current state.
It'd be quite helpful if others could read the docs, specifically for
On 05/20/2015 07:29 PM, CharSyam wrote:
Hi,
I changed typos error. and attached patch for this.
Thanks you.
I only changed comments only
Thanks, committed. Except for this one:
--- src/backend/utils/sort/logtape.c
+++ src/backend/utils/sort/logtape.c
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com wrote:
Actually the issue is what to do about a number of connectors which use a
fairly standard '?' as a placeholder.
Notably absent from the discussion is ODBC upon which JDBC was modelled
and probably predates any use of ?
On May 20, 2015 6:43 AM, David Steele da...@pgmasters.net wrote:
On 5/20/15 1:40 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
On 5/19/15 9:19 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
We could add a second parameter to the current functions:
allow_own_pid DEFAULT false. To me that seems better than an
Thanks :) You make sense.
2015-05-21 1:49 GMT+09:00 Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi:
On 05/20/2015 07:29 PM, CharSyam wrote:
Hi,
I changed typos error. and attached patch for this.
Thanks you.
I only changed comments only
Thanks, committed. Except for this one:
---
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-20 18:09:05 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
This implies that an exclusion constraint is valid in the statement,
which contradicts the docs. Which one is correct?
ON CONFLICT can be used for ... DO NOTHING as well.
Yes, but still confusing when
On 5/20/15 10:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
David Steele da...@pgmasters.net writes:
+1. I agree that cancelling/killing your own process should not be the
default behavior.
I think backwards compatibility probably trumps that argument. I have
no objection to providing a different call that
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I think backwards compatibility probably trumps that argument. I have
no objection to providing a different call that behaves this way, but
changing the behavior of existing applications will face a *much*
higher barrier to
Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi writes:
Thanks, committed. Except for this one:
- * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be seeked.
+ * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be sought.
It's true that the past tense of seek is sought, but it feels a bit
weird to me in
On 2015-05-20 13:31:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Sure, but on what basis does it decide that there's a conflict?
If you can't use an exclusion constraint to support the command,
then the error message shouldn't be worded like that.
But you *can* use a exclusion constraint for DO NOTHING. Just
On 05/19/2015 07:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 05/18/2015 10:52 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net
wrote:
Here's an patch along those lines. It seems to do the trick, at
least for
your test case, and it has the merit of being very
Folks,
While kicking the tires on the new GROUPING() feature, I noticed that
NUMERIC has no cast to bit(n). GROUPING() produces essentially a
bitmap, although the standard mandates for some reason that it be a
numeric type.
I was thinking it should produce NUMERIC rather than int4 as it does
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Josh Berkus wrote:
As such, proposals are more likely to be successful if the proposer can
show how they apply to a general use case, or adapt them so that they
are useful to a large number of our users. This means that this works
in our
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:06 PM, alejandro b...@uclv.cu wrote:
hello, my partner and me are working with the goal of improve the GEQO's
performance, we tried with Ant Colony Optimization, but it does not improve,
actually we are trying with a new variant of Genetic Algorithm, specifically
Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 20/05/15 01:38, Jim Nasby wrote:
If we get this wrong now, we'll be stuck with it forever. At a minimum I
think we should use anything other than || until we can figure this out.
That leaves || available for whichever case we decide on.
I am of strong opinion that
On 05/20/2015 03:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com writes:
Notably absent from the discussion is ODBC upon which JDBC was modelled and
probably predates any use of ? as an operator
historical-nitpicking
It would be a mistake to imagine that operators containing '?' are
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
When did the SQL standard add any mention of ?
It's in SQL92. I don't have a copy of SQL89, or whatever the previous
spec was, to look at.
(So you could argue that Yu and Chen should've removed ? from the set of
allowed operator characters when they
Andres Freund wrote:
Add support for INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE.
Hm, I just realized that the command tag for INSERT ON CONFLICT is still
just INSERT. Is that okay? To me, the behavior is different enough
that it should have its own tag. I'm not too set on this, but maybe
others
Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-20 15:42:23 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
So the first thing to establish is other than Volker himself, who are
we helping here?
I don't agree with this either. Providing a bypass all authentication
configuration option really isn't a good thing. Why
On 2015-05-20 16:44:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andres Freund wrote:
Hm. Anole hasn't reported reliably for a while before these. It's quite
possible that this is a ac++ portability problem around the
atomics. There's lots of other IA64 animals not having problems, but
they're not
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to wrote:
Now that we're on the topic of interesting things, would it make sense to
add protocol support for a sort of a
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-20 16:44:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andres Freund wrote:
Hm. Anole hasn't reported reliably for a while before these. It's quite
possible that this is a ac++ portability problem around the
atomics. There's lots of other IA64 animals not
Tom,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
I don't agree with this either. Providing a bypass all authentication
configuration option really isn't a good thing. Why don't packagers use
our default pg_hba.conf? Because it only makes sense in a
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
I don't agree with this either. Providing a bypass all authentication
configuration option really isn't a good thing. Why don't packagers use
our default pg_hba.conf? Because it only makes sense in a development
type of environment. I'd argue the
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/20/2015 03:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
The ? operator for tintervals can be traced back at least to
Postgres v4r2 (1994), which is the oldest tarball I have at
hand. Most of the current list are geometric operators that
were added by Tom Lockhart
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
Any chance to get this fixed in time for 9.1.16?
I hope you had pinged some days earlier. Here's a patch, but I will
wait until this week's releases have been tagged before pushing.
BTW, I meant to update this thread but
On 2015-05-20 15:42:23 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
So the first thing to establish is other than Volker himself, who are
we helping here?
I don't agree with this either. Providing a bypass all authentication
configuration option really isn't a good thing. Why don't packagers use
our
On 2015-05-20 18:58:16 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andres Freund wrote:
Add support for INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE.
Hm, I just realized that the command tag for INSERT ON CONFLICT is still
just INSERT. Is that okay? To me, the behavior is different enough
that it should
Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com writes:
What if something like this was made to work?
select '{3:5}'::jsonb operator(pg_catalog.?) '3';
(Where the double quotes around the ? would be tolerated, which they
currently are not)
Is there a reason it can't be made to work?
It could be made to
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
What if something like this was made to work?
select '{3:5}'::jsonb operator(pg_catalog.?) '3';
(Where the double quotes around the ? would be tolerated, which they
currently are not)
Is there a reason it can't be
On 05/20/2015 02:11 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I am of strong opinion that concat should be shallow by default. Again it's
how jquery works by default, it's how python's dict.update works and you can
find this behavior
In HEAD only. Previous branches seem mostly clean, so there's something
going wrong. Spinlocks going wrong perhaps?
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=anoledt=2015-05-20%2016%3A30%3A26stg=check
! PANIC: stuck spinlock (cd6f4140) detected at lwlock.c:816
!
Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-20 16:21:57 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
In HEAD only. Previous branches seem mostly clean, so there's something
going wrong. Spinlocks going wrong perhaps?
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com wrote:
On 15 May 2015 at 16:21, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com wrote:
Not sure what the point of this is: as you indicated the ship has
sailed so
to
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
But you *can* use a exclusion constraint for DO NOTHING. Just not (yet)
for DO UPDATE.
FWIW, I don't think exclusion constraint DO UPDATE support is ever
going to be useful.
--
Peter Geoghegan
--
Sent via
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should be more focused on this part of the issue. It seems
to me that it's a good idea for connectors to have an escaping
mechanism. Pretty much any syntax that supports funny characters that
do magical
It is like bugfix than new feature
Dne 20.5.2015 21:08 napsal uživatel Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com:
On 05/20/2015 11:34 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
So Dmitry, at my suggestion, has come up with a way of doing that, by
adding a parameter to jsonb_replace(). If this parameter is set to true
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
That does cover all bases, and users would be able to create the
operator which suits their particular use case easily. It's also fairly
similar to how jsquery works, although the syntax is completely different.
But ... it's after feature freeze. So,
On 05/20/2015 03:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
That does cover all bases, and users would be able to create the
operator which suits their particular use case easily. It's also fairly
similar to how jsquery works, although the syntax is completely different.
But
Josh Berkus wrote:
As such, proposals are more likely to be successful if the proposer can
show how they apply to a general use case, or adapt them so that they
are useful to a large number of our users. This means that this works
in our environment which has conditions X, Y, and Z is not an
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com writes:
What if something like this was made to work?
select '{3:5}'::jsonb operator(pg_catalog.?) '3';
(Where the double quotes around the ? would be tolerated, which they
currently are
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net
wrote:
So Dmitry, at my suggestion, has come up with a way of doing that, by
adding a parameter to jsonb_replace(). If this parameter is set to true (it
defaults to false) and the key or array element pointed to by the last
Hi,
On 2015-05-20 12:22:34 +0300, Uriy Zhuravlev wrote:
On Monday 18 May 2015 10:21:10 you wrote:
difficulty of updating existing cached plans
Could you specify more precisely about some caches we talking about? PREPARE
working correctly:
CREATE TABLE test_ints(i int4);
CREATE TABLE
On 05/20/2015 11:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Josh Berkus wrote:
As such, proposals are more likely to be successful if the proposer can
show how they apply to a general use case, or adapt them so that they
are useful to a large number of our users.
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-20 13:31:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
If you can't use an exclusion constraint to support the command,
then the error message shouldn't be worded like that.
But you *can* use a exclusion constraint for DO NOTHING. Just not (yet)
for DO UPDATE.
* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
As such, proposals are more likely to be successful if the proposer can
show how they apply to a general use case, or adapt them so that they
are useful to a large number of our users. This means that this works
in
On 2015-05-20 11:24:06 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
But you *can* use a exclusion constraint for DO NOTHING. Just not (yet)
for DO UPDATE.
FWIW, I don't think exclusion constraint DO UPDATE support is ever
going to
Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com writes:
Back to the issue at hand. Does anyone have a recommendation for a
replacement operator besides ?
The bikeshedding potential here might be the worst part of the whole
thing. Still, if we can agree on reasonable substitute names, I wouldn't
be against it,
Hi,
Thanks for looking through this!
On 2015-05-20 19:27:05 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
5.
origin.c
* * To create and drop replication origins an exclusive lock on
* pg_replication_slot is required for the
duration. That allows us to
* safely and conflict free assign new origins
On 2015-05-20 12:07:56 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
You're talking about exclusion constraints as an implementation detail
of something interesting, which I had not considered.
I did mention those two usecases a bunch of times... ;)
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
Even if maybe not directly under the guise of exclusion constraints
themselves, but I do think it's an interesting way to more easily allow
to implement unique constraints on !amcanunique type indexes. Or, more
On 2015-05-20 16:21:57 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
In HEAD only. Previous branches seem mostly clean, so there's something
going wrong. Spinlocks going wrong perhaps?
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=anoledt=2015-05-20%2016%3A30%3A26stg=check
! PANIC: stuck
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
While kicking the tires on the new GROUPING() feature, I noticed that
NUMERIC has no cast to bit(n). GROUPING() produces essentially a
bitmap, although the standard mandates for some reason that it be a
numeric type.
I was thinking it should produce
On 05/20/2015 11:34 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
So Dmitry, at my suggestion, has come up with a way of doing that, by
adding a parameter to jsonb_replace(). If this parameter is set to true
(it defaults to false) and the key or array element pointed to by the
last element of the path doesn't
Tom == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
I was thinking it should produce NUMERIC rather than int4 as it does
now in order to accommodate large numbers of columns, but the
usefulness of the bitmap is greatly increased if there's a simple
CAST to bit(n).
Tom Maybe INT8 would be a
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to wrote:
On 5/20/15 5:21 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
That's a reasonable argument. So +1 to protocol from me.
To satisfy Tom, I think this would need to have two
Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com writes:
Notably absent from the discussion is ODBC upon which JDBC was modelled and
probably predates any use of ? as an operator
historical-nitpicking
It would be a mistake to imagine that operators containing '?' are some
johnny-come-lately. The ? operator for
* Josh Berkus (j...@agliodbs.com) wrote:
On 05/20/2015 11:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
The proposal here is to have a configure argument that disables
arbitrary auth mechanisms. How is that specific to a particular
environment?
I think
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to wrote:
Now that we're on the topic of interesting things, would it make sense to
add protocol support for a sort of a re-authenticate? So a pooler could
first say this user wants to log in from this host,
On 2015-05-20 15:37:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
That does cover all bases, and users would be able to create the
operator which suits their particular use case easily. It's also fairly
similar to how jsquery works, although the syntax is completely
hello, my partner and me are working with the goal of improve the GEQO's
performance, we tried with Ant Colony Optimization, but it does not improve,
actually we are trying with a new variant of Genetic Algorithm, specifically
Micro-GA. This algorithm finds a better solution than GEQO in less
Uriy Zhuravlev wrote:
And can you explain more about the syntax?
I think he means to treat COMMUTATOR etc like a generic element list,
i.e. don't define new keywords in kwlist.h/gram.y at all but rather pass
the names as strings (probably using a list of DefElem) and strcmp()
them in
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Uriy Zhuravlev wrote:
And can you explain more about the syntax?
I think he means to treat COMMUTATOR etc like a generic element list,
i.e. don't define new keywords in kwlist.h/gram.y at all but rather pass
the names as strings (probably using
On 5/20/15 8:47 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com writes:
On 5/19/15 9:19 PM, FabrÃzio de Royes Mello wrote:
+1 to add a second parameter to current functions.
Instead of allow_own_pid, I went with skip_own_pid. I have the function
still returning true even when it
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
On 2015-05-20 19:46:12 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
In other words, I agree with you that we can't simply get rid of 'trust'
without having another solution. I *do* believe that a real single-user
mode that is only available to the owner of the
On 5/20/15 3:31 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
After mulling over this a bit, I think that if we're to do something to
improve things here we should redesign the protocol so that it considers
poolers
Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com writes:
On 5/20/15 6:56 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-20 18:48:59 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
and generally if you want to terminate the connection there's easier
ways to do that then SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pg_backend_pid()).
Which would be what
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hm, I just realized that the command tag for INSERT ON CONFLICT is still
just INSERT. Is that okay? To me, the behavior is different enough
that it should have its own tag. I'm not too
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
