Hello
There is one week left in the PGCon CFP. Details below. Please submit.
Thanks.
PGCon 2016 will be on 17-21 May 2016 at University of Ottawa.
* 17-18 (Tue-Wed) tutorials
* 19 & 20 (Thu-Fri) talks - the main part of the conference
* 17 & 21 (Wed & Sat) The Developer Unconference & the Us
gistration is now open at http://www.pgcon.org/2017/registration.php
<http://www.pgcon.org/2017/registration.php>
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org <mailto:d...@langille.org>
<http://www.pgcon.org/2014/submissions.php>
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
n 2012 are available
from: <http://www.pgcon.org/2012/submissions.php>
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
<http://www.pgcon.org/2012/papers.php>
Instructions for submitting a proposal to PGCon 2012 are available
from: <http://www.pgcon.org/2012/submissions.php>
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make cha
want to be there. Don't leave it much longer.
—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
HEADS UP.
PGCon 2015 will be in June. That’s a few weeks later than in previous years.
—
Dan Langille
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
In case you've overlooked it, you have about two weeks to submit your proposal.
PGCon 2016 will be on 17-21 May 2016 at University of Ottawa.
* 17-18 (Tue-Wed) tutorials
* 19 & 20 (Thu-Fri) talks - the main part of the conference
* 17 & 21 (Wed & Sat) The Developer Unconference & the User Unconfe
php>
Instructions for submitting a proposal to PGCon 2013 are available
from: <http://www.pgcon.org/2013/submissions.php>
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.po
by developers and users of
PostgreSQL.
Be sure to submit your proposal soon because time is running out.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql
e
from: <http://www.pgcon.org/2011/submissions.php>
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
will go out very close to the conference.
Do not submit lightning talks proposals until then.
See also <http://www.pgcon.org/2014/papers.php>
Instructions for submitting a proposal to PGCon 2014 are available
from: <http://www.pgcon.org/2014/submissions.php>
--
Dan Lan
7/papers.php>>
Instructions for submitting a proposal to PGCon 2017 are available
from: <http://www.pgcon.org/2017/submissions.php
<http://www.pgcon.org/2017/submissions.php>>
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org <mailto:d...@langille.org>
If someone wanted to donate a SuperServer 6028TR-D72R
(http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/2U/6028/SYS-6028TR-D72R.cfm) to the
PostgreSQL project, would it be used?
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org
week, but we felt that our
changes
were already disruptive and wanted to minimize the effects this late change may
have on people who have already booked travel / accommodation. To those
affected, we apologize and hope that this new structure will benefit everyone.
—
Dan Langille
ht
<http://www.pgcon.org/2015/submissions.php>
—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
015/papers.php>
Instructions for submitting a proposal to PGCon 2015 are available
from: <http://www.pgcon.org/2015/submissions.php>
—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscr
Is your PGCon 2015 submission going in today or tomorrow?
--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Today is your last day to submit your PGCon 2015 proposal.
--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Have you been to PGCon before? Do you remember the hacker lounge? Do you
remember going there to work on stuff? Do you recall anything about it?
—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
> On May 27, 2015, at 12:06 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Dan Langille <mailto:d...@langille.org>> wrote:
> Have you been to PGCon before? Do you remember the hacker lounge? Do you
> remember going there to work on stuff? D
pgsql/data/pg_subtrans] # ls -l
total 1
-rw--- 1 pgsql pgsql 8192 Jun 5 19:04 0032
This not not a high throughput server.
—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
If there's anything I can try on my servers to help diagnose the issues,
please let me know. If desired, I can arrange access for debugging.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
> > Thomas Munro wrote:
> >
> >> My idea w
sions.php>
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
proposals
19 Apr 2008 Final papers/slides must arrive no later than this date
See also <http://www.pgcon.org/2008/papers.php>
Instructions for submitting a proposal to PGCon 2008 are available
from: <http://www.pgcon.org/2008/submissions.php>
--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille
_XML=true
WITH_TZDATA=true
WITHOUT_DEBUG=true
WITHOUT_INTDATE=true
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $
--
Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane wearing the PGCon 2009 t-shirt
http://img199.imageshack.us/my.php?image=b9w.jpg&via=tfrog
- --
Dan Langille
BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon
The original tester says "this is an anonymous procedure".
On 30 Sep 2002 at 15:07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> It is not clear to me; is this its own transaction or a function
> call?
>
> ----------
> -
I have been looking at contrib/ltree in the PostgreSQL repository. I've
modified the code to allow / as a node delimiter instead of . which is the
default.
Below are the patches to make this change. I have also moved the
delimiter to a DEFINE so that other customizations are easily done. This
i
On 27 Nov 2002 at 12:16, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
> > I have been looking at contrib/ltree in the PostgreSQL repository.
> > I've modified the code to allow / as a node delimiter instead of .
> > which is the default.
> What is the reason for
at was
not my goal. :)
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
Can you see this tying in with my recent hack of contrib/ltree to work
with a wider range of node names?
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> Me and Teodor hope to work on contrib/ltree to add support for sort of
> xml. Any ideas are welcome !
---(end of broadcast
On 3 Dec 2002 at 15:08, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> Where have you been? The lines of distinction between all of the
> lists have gotten so blurred it hardly makes a difference.
So consider this a wake up call.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(
/usr/local/pgsql/data.old
That's when I encountered the message mentioned in the subject.
The solution involved:
# mv /usr/local/pgsql/data.old /usr/local/pgsql/data
# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/010.pgsql.sh stop
# mv /usr/local/pgsql/data /usr/local/pgsql/data.old
# su -l pgsql -c initdb
Then
We support "alter table add foreign key". How about supporting
"alter table drop foreign key"?
- he said as he went to drop a foreign key
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have y
On 5 Dec 2002 at 8:20, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > We support "alter table add foreign key". How about supporting
> > "alter table drop foreign key"?
> >
> > - he said as he went to drop a foreig
On 5 Dec 2002 at 8:20, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > We support "alter table add foreign key". How about supporting
> > "alter table drop foreign key"?
> >
> > - he said as he went to drop a foreig
On 5 Dec 2002 at 8:44, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > On 5 Dec 2002 at 8:20, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
> > >
> > > > We support "alter table add
On 5 Dec 2002 at 11:47, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 5 Dec 2002 at 8:44, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > > On 5 Dec 2002 at 8:20, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, D
On 5 Dec 2002 at 9:02, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > Found the solution:
> >
> > drop trigger "RI_ConstraintTrigger_4278488" on watch_list_staging;
>
> Actually there are three triggers for the constraint. You m
BLE ADD CONSTRAINT blah CHECK (foo!=0);
> to make a named check constraint.
Understood.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
On 5 Dec 2002 at 9:51, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > On 5 Dec 2002 at 9:31, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> >
> > > When we talk about ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY we're being imprecise, so
> > > I think that might
EIGN KEY
That I know. That syntax is radically different from that proposed.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
se if (state == LQPRS_WAITEND)
> > {
> > - if (*ptr == NODE_DELIMITER)
> > + if (*ptr == '.')
> > {
> > state = LQPRS_WAITLEVEL;
> >
On 5 Dec 2002 at 14:17, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:> On 5 Dec 2002 at 11:47, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > drop trigger "RI_ConstraintTrigger_4278488" on watch_list_staging;
> >
>
> You should now go to the table this RI constraint was ref
clause
> for all commands that add constraints.
Except that one is ADD CONSTRAINT, the other is an ADD FOREIGN KEY.
They are similar in nature but different overall.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
documented, the following is valid and works:
ALTER TABLE slave
ADD FOREIGN KEY (master_id)
REFERENCES master (id) ON DELETE CASCADE;
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet,
On 5 Dec 2002 at 15:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> You can do that now.
> >> ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY
>
> > That I know. That syntax is radically different from that proposed.
>
>
eleng/index.html.
This will also lighten the load on the core team allowing them to
focus on development and such.
cheers
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please se
On 9 Dec 2002 at 11:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Let's create a release team. This strategy is one well established
> > in other projects and in industry. For lack of a better starting
> > reference, le
On 10 Dec 2002 at 0:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is the process documented? Any set procedure? Who knows how to do
> > it?
>
> Er ... nope, nope, the core bunch ...
Sounds like we need to do a brain dump then. I jus
On 10 Dec 2002 at 9:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> --- for example: Marc owns, runs, and pays for the
> >> postgresql.org servers.
>
> > Is the cvs repo mirrored?
>
> Anyone running cvsup would have a com
http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/ is down
Warning: Unable to connect to PostgreSQL server: The Data Base System
is shutting down in /usr/local/www/www/idocs/opendb.php on line 3
Unable to access database
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast
02-12/msg00203.php
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> One of the reasons I ask is, if it is a good reason, like say "security",
> maybe I can persuade the FreeBSD port responsible guys to bring the port
> into the upcoming FreeBSD 5.0 release. The port freeze was introduced just
> before pg-7.3 was relea
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Since going from 7.2 to 7.3 is a significant upgrade, the FreeBSD guys would
> probablyu be right tho to refuse such a major upgrade... Still, it's a pity
> though. Postgres 7.3 has been tested and works fine on FreeBSD 5.
FreeBSD uses somet
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> ps. Why is Postgres 7.3 still in ports/databases/postgresql-devel ??
I forgot one other possible answer: perhaps the port maintainer is taking
a well deserved holiday?
---(end of broadcast)---
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> --On måndag, december 30, 2002 06.35.22 -0500 Dan Langille
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >
> >> ps. Why is Postgres 7.3 still in ports/databases/postgresql
I'll do that. Justin: What's the URL for the .pgpass stuff? So far I see
mention of using SSL. That's two items to cover. Anything else?
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Yes, I have been feeling we should do that. Justin pointed out just
> yesterday that .pgpass is only mentioned
See http://polls.unixathome.org/
Goal: create a voting script which uses PostgreSQL to store the data.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
an alot more than most technical folks want to
> acknowledge.
>
> Please vote for your favorite database.
Coincidentally, I've just started up a voting script project... see
http://polls.unixathome.org/
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
--
On 2 Jan 2003 at 21:30, Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> > Coincidentally, I've just started up a voting script project... see
> > http://polls.unixathome.org/
>
> Does it support hanging chads?
Now is the time to decide that
--
Dan Langille :
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Is pg_upgrade too hard to run? Is no one really interested in it?
All of my boxes are still on 7.2.3. Does that represent a viable test
base?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list a
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Greg Copeland writes:
>
> > Just a reminder, there still doesn't appear to be a 7.3.1 tag.
>
> There is a long tradition of systematically failing to tag releases in
> this project. Don't expect it to improve.
It was I who suggested that a release te
msg resent because I incorrectly copied/pasted some addresses.
Sorry.
On 4 Jan 2003 at 11:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> There is a long tradition of systematically failing to tag relea
msg resent because I incorrectly copied/pasted some addresses. Sorry.
On 4 Jan 2003 at 11:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> There is a long tradition of systematically failing to tag relea
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I never considered tag'ng for minor releases as having any importance,
> > since the tarball's themselves provide the 'tag' ... branches give us the
> > ability to back-patch, but tag's don't provide us anythi
On 5 Jan 2003, Neil Conway wrote:
> Obviously, but it's VERY unprofessional for us to show ads to users on
> our website. It goes without saying, but pretty much every other
> non-trivial OSS project doesn't have ads on their main website.
> Displaying ads makes us look more like a Geocities site
On 6 Jan 2003 at 18:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If the banner ads (as previously stated) do not bring in much revenue,
> is there a reason to keep them?
This has been mentioned more than once AFAIK. It is in "payment" to
those who have provided mirror services.
--
Dan
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Info:
> > http://search400.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid3_gci331973,00.html
>
> That page quoth
>
> OS/400 and its related software has added support for:
>
> The Portable Application Solutions Environment
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Justin Clift wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Just found out that the "pgdiff" utility (the one for comparing two
> different PostgreSQL database's) was released and uploaded to
> SourceForge in November:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgdiff
>
> Have people already looked at thi
Get off your own ass and do it. In short, put up or shut up.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > Hm, so it does. It seems like the edited query should go into
> > history, at least when you execute it. Peter, is this fixable?
>
> Wow, that would be a nifty trick, though they really did type \e and
> not the query the pulled in from the editor.
What about those of us
On 9 Jan 2003 at 9:15, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 08:45, Peter Mount wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > On 8 Jan 2003 at 12:28, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > > "Alexander M. Pravking&qu
resent with my real mail address...
On 9 Jan 2003 at 13:45, Peter Mount wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > On 8 Jan 2003 at 12:28, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > "Alexander M. Pravking" <[EMAIL PROT
worked upon.
>
> Makese sense. However, it still has the shock factor of displaying a
> huge query, which is usually what is involved when using the editor.
Which is a good indicator that a way to turn it off is a good idea.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
me period is this for?
>
> Any given day. It's disk space, not traffic.
I think anyone thinking of putting up a mirror will want to know
traffic volumes.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)-
With reference to my post to the "PostgreSQL Password Cracker" on
2003-01-02, I've promised to write a security document for the project.
Here it is, Sunday night, and I can't sleep. What better way to get there
than start this task...
My plan is to write this in very simple HTML. I will post th
that -c args is treated
by the login shell !
[09:35] mmc_: Hmm.. true. That makes it a heavy enough
reason. Thanks.
[09:35] * fede2 departs
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
ROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: getting number of rows updated within a procedure
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 23:27:06 +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
> I'm writing some stuff in PL/pgsql (actually, a lot of stuff). I have a
> question: At various times, it does UPDAT
appears to be consistent with the SQL99 spec.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On 4 Jul 2003 at 23:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Now that my NZ server is up and running:
> > template1=# select now();
> > 2003-07-05 12:47:15.444535+12
>
> > That doesn't look backwards to me.
&
rver, but it's in the process of upgrading PG..
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
).
--
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.pgcon.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ
tion is available
> http://mira.sai.msu.su/~megera/pgsql/ftsdoc/
Please submit a proposal at the URL below. :)
>
> Oleg
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > I have the pleasure of announcing your PGCon 2007 program committee.
> >
> > Bruce Momjian
>
On 7 Jan 2007 at 1:39, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > On 6 Jan 2007 at 12:09, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> >
> >> What's about spronsoring ?
> >
> > Are you asking if your and Teodor can be sponsored?
>
> yes
bsddiary.org=# set search_path = phorum, public, pg_catalog;
ERROR: schema "phorum" does not exist
freebsddiary.org=#
New issue? Known bug?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
rib/pgcrypto made the problem go away.
I found no mention of this problem in the archives.
FWIW: I was using the FreeBSD port on 4.9-STABLE.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP
My search was wrong. This is a known issue.
Sorry for the post.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
On 30 Jan 2004 at 23:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I upgraded two servers today from 7.3.* to 7.4.1. In both cases, the
> > schemas which existed in the original databases were not created in
> > the new database.
&g
On 31 Jan 2004 at 11:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> I upgraded two servers today from 7.3.* to 7.4.1. In both cases, the
> >>> schemas which existed in the original databases were not created in
> >&
92 matches
Mail list logo
