> -Original Message-
> From: Marian POPESCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 8:06 AM
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ARC patent
>
> >>>Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>
> >>>
> FYI, IBM has applied for a patent on ARC (AFA
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 10:23 AM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ARC patent
>
>
> Dave Held wrote:
> > > -Original Message
> -Original Message-
> From: ElayaRaja S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 1:38 PM
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: [HACKERS] pg_hba.conf
>
>
> Hi,
> I am using Redhat linux 9. i had configure in pg_hba.conf as
> hostpostgres postgres 10.10.0.76
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 5:56 PM
> To: Christopher Browne
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] argtype_inherit() is dead code
>
> [...]
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 07:01:41PM -0400, Christopher
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 8:56 AM
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!!
> :)
>
> GCC 4.0.0 has been released.
> [...]
I think that's great new
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 1:59 PM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
> headaches!! :)
>
> [...]
> I th
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 10:17 AM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
> headaches!! :)
>
> [...]
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 10:56 AM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
> headaches!! :)
>
> [...]
> I dun
> -Original Message-
> From: Dann Corbit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 1:08 PM
> To: Andrew Dunstan; Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
> headaches!!
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 4:29 PM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
> headaches!! :)
>
> [...]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 3:49 PM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
> headaches!! :)
>
> [...]
> I rec
> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 11:42 AM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
> headaches!! :)
>
> [...]
> Uhm
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 1:22 PM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
> headaches!! :)
>
> [...]
> And not muc
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 12:06 PM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Dave Held; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
> headaches!! :)
>
> [
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 9:46 AM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
> headaches!! :)
>
> [...]
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 10:23 AM
> To: Simon Riggs
> Cc: josh@agliodbs.com; Greg Stark; Marko Ristola; pgsql-perform;
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks
> s
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 2:08 PM
> To: Andrew Dunstan
> Cc: Tom Lane; Greg Stark; Marko Ristola; pgsql-perform;
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks
> sugge
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 3:43 PM
> To: josh@agliodbs.com
> Cc: pgsql-perform; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks
> suggested?
>
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gurmeet Manku [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 5:01 PM
> To: Simon Riggs
> Cc: Tom Lane; josh@agliodbs.com; Greg Stark; Marko Ristola;
> pgsql-perform; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Utkarsh Srivastava;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 1:00 AM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Rod Taylor; Greg Stark; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org;
> Gurmeet Manku
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks
> suggested?
>
> Tom L
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 10:25 AM
> To: Andrew Dunstan
> Cc: Mischa Sandberg; pgsql-perform; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks
> suggested?
>
> [...]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 12:04 PM
> To: PostgreSQL advocacy
> Cc: Kris Jurka; Andrew Dunstan; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
>
> [...]
> The thing th
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 12:17 PM
> To: PostgreSQL advocacy
> Cc: Dave Held; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
>
> > [.
> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 12:33 PM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development; PostgreSQL advocacy
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
>
> [...]
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 1:21 PM
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Marc G. Fournier; PostgreSQL advocacy; Dave Held;
> PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Proc
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 3:33 PM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: PostgreSQL advocacy; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS:
> Increased
> company invol
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 1:50 PM
> To: josh@agliodbs.com
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; Marc G. Fournier; PostgreSQL advocacy; Dave Held;
> PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS]
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 9:31 AM
> To: Hannu Krosing
> Cc: Heikki Linnakangas; Neil Conway; Oliver Jowett;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Peter Eisentraut; Alvaro Herrera;
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Feat
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 7:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Dave Held; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS:
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 12:39 PM
> To: Heikki Linnakangas
> Cc: Hannu Krosing; Neil Conway; Oliver Jowett;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Peter Eisentraut; Alvaro Herrera;
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fea
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 3:36 PM
> To: Dave Held; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze date for 8.1
>
> [...]
> Yes, this looks like good.Bu
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:20 PM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze date for 8.1
>
>
> "Dave Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 11:17 PM
> To: Oleg Bartunov
> Cc: Pgsql Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 'infinity' in GiST index
>
> [...]
> Seems like it's not really GiST's fault but a definitional problem
> for the timest
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 8:43 AM
> To: Thomas Hallgren
> Cc: Tom Lane; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Oracle Style packages on postgres
>
> [...]
> I suppose. I think we sho
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:42 PM
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Dave Held; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Oracle Style packages on postgres
>
> [...]
> There's been
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:55 AM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Oracle Style packages on postgres
>
>
> "Dave Held" <[EMAIL PR
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 2:22 PM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Oracle Style packages on postgres
>
>
> "Dave
Title: Modifying COPY TO
I am interested in hacking COPY TO such that one can specify that
rows are copied in a certain index order. I got as far as
src/backend/commands/copy.c:CopyTo(), and it looks like I would need
to modify the call to heap_beginscan() so that it uses a key. However
38 matches
Mail list logo
