On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:27:37PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/9/13 5:56 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:13:56PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:00:02PM -0500, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>> Hackers,
> >&g
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:13:56PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:00:02PM -0500, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Hackers,
> >
> > We need a Commit Fest manager for the September CF. I'm not going
> > to do it; this month is a heavy travel month
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 05:21:31PM +0200, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> 2013/9/7 David Fetter :
> > The broad outlines look great.
> >
> > Do we have any way, at least conceptually, to consider the graph
> > of the cluster with edges weighted by network bandwidth and
> >
>
> * API to add an alternative join path, in addition to built-in join logic.
> * API to add an alternative scan path, in addition to built-in scan logic.
> * API to construct "CustomJoin" according to the related path.
> * API to construct "CustomScan" acc
think this actually just means the header does not include all it needs by
> itself.
Is there some standard set of checks you run on new patches, and are
the results showing up on, say, the buildfarm or some other CI
dashboard?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1
Checklist Mike and I assembled:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest_Checklist
>
> Mind you, Peter E. seems to be getting patches organized ... are you
> CFM for this one, Peter?
If Peter won't, I will.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone
need to clear at least as far as
documenting what we do (do the access constraint before anything else,
e.g.) or why we don't do things (disabling EXPLAIN, e.g.).
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XM
at really is orthogonal to whether
> or not you can give multiple --function arguments.
Come to think of it, some kind of recognition that functions can come
in several flavors would be awesome, e.g.
--function=myfunc\*
which would capture all variants of myfunc.
Let the bikesh
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 08:14:32PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 27.08.2013 03:26, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:17 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> >>On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:29:06PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >>>While looking at
> it just an oversight or lack of interest? No doubt that --table is
> the most interesting one, but IMHO the other options should behave
> the same, for the sake of consistency.
+1 for making them consistent. There will also be an improvement in
usability.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fe
it.
> More, I would to see 9.4 release:).
Same here! :)
> x.4 are happy PostgreSQL releases :)
Each one has been at least baseline happy for me since 7.1. Some have
made me overjoyed, though.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter66
$
DECLARE v TEXT;
BEGIN
FOR v IN SELECT pg_catalog.quote_ident(schemaname) || '.' ||
pg_catalog.quote_ident(viewname)
FROM pg_catalog.pg_views
WHERE schemaname NOT IN ('pg_catalog', 'information_schema') LOOP
EXECUTE 'REVOKE INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, T
There's a paper that includes the phrase "g-join" from 2011 here:
http://wwwlgis.informatik.uni-kl.de/cms/fileadmin/users/haerder/2011/JoinAndGrouping.pdf
Is that it?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: d
ach. The only drawback is that it requires
> having PLproxy in core first, or something like Foreign Functions or
> something.
SQL/MED does define such an API. Whether we find it useful enough to
make it the default way of doing things is a separate matter. I'll do
some research.
Che
es where this can occur though.
If you don't find one considerably simpler, I'm inclined to say we
should let it lie, possibly with docs--even user-visible ones if you
think it's appropriate.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:22:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:40:38PM -0700, David Gudeman wrote:
> >> When you write an application involving foreign tables, you frequently
> >> end up with queries that are just too ine
W API, but I think it's common enough that we do need to
solve it as above.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/p
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:33:54AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:38:15PM +, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> > Tom Lane said:
> > > If we did it with a WithOrdinality expression node, the result would
> > > always be of type RECORD, and we&
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:09:20PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> David
>
> On Tuesday, July 23, 2013, David Fetter wrote:
> >
> > There are a lot of ways foreign tables don't yet act like local
> > ones. Much as I'm a booster for fixing that problem,
7;t yet act like local ones.
Much as I'm a booster for fixing that problem, I'm thinking
improvements in this direction are for a separate patch.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fe
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:52:14PM +0200, Karol Trzcionka wrote:
> I've noticed problem with "UPDATE ... FROM" statement. Fix in new version.
> Regards,
> Karol
What problem or problems did you notice, and what did you change to
fix them?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:55:33PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:44:59PM -0700, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> > Pavel Stehule writes:
> > >> SELECT * from top5();
> >
> > $ TABLE top5; -- add a view on top of the SRF
> >
> >
p20, ... what is not too friendly
>
> The SRF could be using custom GUCs so that you can parametrize it, or
> just even classic parameters…
>
> $ TABLE top(5); -- needs a patch to accept SRF here…
Andrew Gierth will probably be posting a design & patch for something
si
t; that is lag values that are large compared to the actual transaction
> latency, indicate that something is amiss in the throttling process.
> High schedule lag can highlight a subtle problem there even if the
> target rate limit is met in the end.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:41:14AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:56 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> > Please find attached a PoC patch to implement $subject.
> >
> > So far, with a lot of help from Andrew Gierth, I've roughed out an
> > implemen
, etc.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres:
entile_cont(float8[]) returning
> arrays; e.g. percentile_cont(array[0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1]) to return
> an array containing the bounds, median and quartiles in one go. This
> is an extension to the spec but it seems sufficiently obviously
> useful to be worth supporting.
>
&g
gt;
> Agreed. The OpenSSL Project last applied a security fix to 0.9.6
> over eight years ago. Compatibility with 0.9.6 has zero or negative
> value.
You've made a persuasive case that we should actively break backward
compatibility here. Would that be complicated to do?
Cheers,
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:15:12PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 06:37:26PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 11:49:21AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> > > Overall I think this patch offers useful additional functionality, in
> > &
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:15:12PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 06:37:26PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 11:49:21AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> > > Overall I think this patch offers useful additional functionality, in
> > &
d if the pointer
> doesn't point to "unreserved" memory (I mean - memory which may be
> overwritten by something meanwhile).
Thanks for the updated patch!
Anybody care to look this over for vulnerabilities as described above?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 11:49:21AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 5 July 2013 18:23, David Fetter wrote:
> > Please find attached changes based on the above.
> >
>
> This looks good. The grammar changes are smaller and neater now on top
> of the makeFuncCall() patch.
&
re what may fail so you use it on your risk ;)
> Regards,
> Karol
Karol,
Per discussion in IRC, please follow up with your patch that includes
such documentation, new regression tests, etc., you've written for the
feature.
Thanks! :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:30:38PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 1 July 2013 01:44, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:22:52PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> >> On 21 June 2013 06:16, David Fetter wrote:
> >> > Please find attached a patch which a
orry for the noise.
If I had a nickel for every apparent failure of this nature, I'd never
need to work again.
Thanks for checking :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gma
GUC to be
> printed would be more misleading than helpful.
How about printing them with something along the lines of, "Please
load extension foobar for details" or (less informative, but possibly
easier to code) "libfoobar.so not loaded." ?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http
r people can see what
you're talking about and actually help.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:52:55AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 7/1/13 10:20 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:24AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> >>>> You can run \! man from within psq
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:24AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> >> You can run \! man from within psql,
> > And if you're on Windows, you're Sadly Out of Luck with that. Is
> > there an equivalent we could #ifdef in
hat tests
only routinely get run by our CI system--currently the buildfarm--and
which ones developers could reasonably be expected to wait until
post-push to run in day-to-day development.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Sk
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:28:35PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/28/13 11:30 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> David Fetter writes:
> >>> Please find attached the latest patch.
> >>
> >> I
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:22:52PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 21 June 2013 06:16, David Fetter wrote:
> > Please find attached a patch which allows subqueries in the FILTER
> > clause and adds regression testing for same.
> >
>
> This needs re-basing/merging follo
quot;\h CREATE VIEW" in psql, which was the
> >> case where it was brought to my attention.
> >
> > Maybe \h should somehow display the "see also" section?
>
> You can run \! man from within psql,
And if you're on Windows, you're Sadly Out of Luck
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:31:16AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
> > Please find attached the latest patch.
>
> I remain of the opinion that this is simply a bad idea. It is unlike
> our habits for constructing other types of nodes, and makes it harder
> n
makeSimpleA_Expr(AEXPR_OP, "~~", $1,
> (Node *) n, @2);
> !
>
> Changes required from author:
> ===
> It will be good if you remove unrelated changes from the patch and possibly
> all
> white-space errors.
>
> Thanks
Thanks for the review!
Please fin
in. Is there
some code I can look at?
I still submit that having our reserved word ducks in a row in advance
is a saner way to go about this, and will work up a patch for that as
I have time.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfette
tions are high, especially
when it's not stuff like covering their expenses.
http://www.iew.uzh.ch/wp/iewwp007.pdf
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal
n if by some magic we manage to unreserve
the words?
> This also helps keep down the size of the generated parse tables,
> doesn't it?
Could well. I suspect we may need to rethink the whole way we do
grammar at some point, but that's for a later discussion when I (or
someone el
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:48:35AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:34:52AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> > On 15 June 2013 10:22, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> > > There seem to be 2 separate directions that this could go, which
> > > really
ing review:
Does it follow the project coding guidelines?
Yes.
Are there portability issues?
Not that I can see.
Will it work on Windows/BSD etc?
Not yet tested.
Are the comments sufficient and accurate?
Yes.
Does it do what it says, corre
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:10:25AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David Fetter escribió:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:59:27PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
> > > In my testing of sub-queries in the FILTER clause (an extension to the
> > > spec), I was able
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:10:25AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David Fetter escribió:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:59:27PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
> > > In my testing of sub-queries in the FILTER clause (an extension
> > > to the spec), I was able
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:59:27PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 17 June 2013 06:36, David Fetter wrote:
> >> > > Please find attached two versions of a patch which provides optional
> >> > > FILTER clause for aggregates (T612, "Advanced OLAP operat
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:48:38AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:09:19AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > David Fetter writes:
> > > Per suggestions and lots of help from Andrew Gierth, please find
> > > attached a patch to clean up the call site
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 01:29:41PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 01:09:30PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:45:31AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:59:22PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > > &g
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:14:14AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 06/14/2013 10:11 AM, David Fetter wrote:
>
> >>>ok, thanks, I will wait.
> >>Hi Joe,
> >>
> >>Do you have some time in the weekend to help me submit the patch?
> >>Thanks,
&
least a couple of days
> >> before I have the time to look at this,
> >>
> >> Joe
> >>
> >>
> > ok, thanks, I will wait.
> Hi Joe,
>
> Do you have some time in the weekend to help me submit the patch?
> Thanks,
>
> Liming
L
et do is
in the realm of access control, e.g. allowing people to use DO rather
than giving them DDL permission to create temporary functions.
Is this what you have in mind? What other things?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfett
proc;
> ...
> $$ LANGUAGE SQL;
>
> and you don't need to define output structure - what is much more user
> friendly.
If I understand the proposal correctly, the idea is only to try to
return something when DO is invoked with RETURNING.
1. Did I understand correctly, Hannu?
2.
thought though, as no fixed
ordering could cover all cases.
Maybe lines like
local all postgres peer,md5
in pg_hba.conf would be the way to do this, where the list gets
evaluated in the order it's read.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
not be necessary
> when identifying a given major release, so I just didn't get the meaning of
> what Craig said. As you say, you would still need the 2nd digit for minor
> releases.
What's been proposed before that wouldn't break previous applications
is a numbering system like
i.postgresql.org/wiki/Working_with_Git
Cheers,
David (wondering whether we should provide specific instructions for
github, bitbucket, etc.).
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://
problems.
Would you be so kind as to point out same, or better still, to write
up what you think of as a better example intended for the same
audience? I'm sure the PGXN people would be delighted to put
something better up there.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 4
new features like this go
there. Please also to send along the tests you're doing so others can
riff. Tests that find any weak points are also good.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: da
ad idea.) sketch of an idea: create an API
to pass expression trees in and out. This could have other benefits
as to clustering space, shortening the planning cycle, etc., but let's
not go there for now. My knowledge is very, very sketchy, but when I
squint, the expression trees we use look
ey'll just face a very large hurdle when it comes
> to pulling that code back into their proprietary product.
>
> I don't know of any good way to solve that problem. Maybe it's not
> worth solving... but I do suspect there's some useful stuff that the
> comm
re ones would depend
on. Yes, it's possible (kinda) to do this with the FDW machinery, but
the burden is much higher as it requires DDL permission in general
each time.
> so weighing it down with processing options seems like a pretty
> dubious idea even if the implementation were eas
e, j’y crois) — je ne
vous connais plus, vous n’êtes plus mon ami, vous n’êtes plus мой
верный раб, comme vous dites. Ну, здравствуйте, здравствуйте.
Je vois que je vous fais peur, садитесь и рассказывайте.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 01:40:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
> > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:28:53PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> prior/after? Both are unreserved keywords atm and it seems far less
> >> likely to have conflicts than new/old.
>
words both have
meaning in, for example, a trigger definition, but they're clearly
separable by context.
Yay, bike-shedding!
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: web
e
characteristics as above, namely that it refers only to constants and columns
in the updated table and not to everything available from the USING clause if
included.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: dav
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 11:12:28AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
> > According to SQL:2003 and SQL:2008 (and the draft standard, if
> > that matters) in section 5.2 of Foundation, both NEW and OLD are
> > reserved words, so we're going to need to re-
n this. When we do
re-reserve, we'll need to come up with a migration path.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/peopl
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 01:09:30PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:45:31AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:59:22PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > Per suggestions and lots of help from Andre
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 05:52:03PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 16:46 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:49:47PM +, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Given this risk and the lack of field complaints about the issue, it
> > > doesn&#
t seem prudent to back-patch.
>
> In passing, rearrange code in assign_collations_walker so that we don't
> need multiple copies of the standard logic for computing collation of a
> node with children. (Previously, CaseExpr duplicated the standard logic,
> and we would have neede
DER BY expression(s) ought to be considered independently
> rather than as part of the agg's argument list.
>
> It looks like the proposed patch gets this right, but the proposed
> test cases really fail to illuminate the problem IMO.
>
> regards, tom
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:57:27AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> Folks,
>
> While testing the upcoming FILTER clause for aggregates, Erik Rijkers
> uncovered a long-standing bug in $subject, namely that this case
> wasn't handled. Please find attached a patch by Andrew Giert
t VAR has been
> >> reduced by one because the 2 column is no longer there.
> >>
> >> I did something very much like this in my roll-your-own version of FDW so
> >> I know basically how to do it, but I did it at the pre-planning stage and
> >> I'm
fixed.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 07:04:55PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 15 April 2013 18:41, David Fetter wrote:
>
> > The difference between HEAD and patch in the "COPY, with sequence"
> > case is pretty remarkable. What's the patch?
>
> Attached.
Thanks!
known
> performance issues that I hope to cover later. Zero indexes is not
> real, but we're trying to measure the effect and benefit of an
> isolated change, so in this case it is appropriate.
The difference between HEAD and patch in the "COPY, with sequence"
case is p
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 05:04:16PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 15 April 2013 16:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Simon Riggs writes:
> >> On 15 April 2013 16:24, David Fetter wrote:
> >>> Do you have numbers on this, or ways to gather same? In other
> >>>
I'd like to do is to invent a new form of labelling that
> > allows us to understand that COPY can still be optimised.
>
> And I don't want to invent impossible-to-verify function attributes
> with such a tiny use-case as this.
Are you referring to the Halting Problem?
Cheer
ample in order to demonstrate it:
>
> Before the patch:
> Buffers: shared hit=*857*
> After the patch:
> Buffers: shared hit=*497*
Neato!
Inside the patch, s/monotonous/monotone/, I think.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
ld mean we
> don't have to invent new keywords every time we have a new function
> label.
>
> Suggestions please.
JSON's in core. How about using that?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: da
ome default like ./pg_dump
when -j is specified. It could of course be overridden by -Fd.
What say?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/i
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:45:31AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:59:22PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Per suggestions and lots of help from Andrew Gierth, please find
> > attached a patch to clean up the call sites for FuncCal
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 12:07:35PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:55 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 12:09:51PM +1300, Mike Toews wrote:
> > > Hi hackers,
> > >
> > > Type info can be viewed with "\d mytable"
we should add it as a SET parameter and expose it to all
SQL. The next client program(s) shouldn't have to re-invent this
separately.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmai
ables. Have you considered this?
I'm guessing it'd be .views if anything. Haven't been able to
decipher from section 11 of the standard (Schemata) whether the
standard has anything to say on the matter.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 37
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:45:31AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:59:22PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Per suggestions and lots of help from Andrew Gierth, please find
> > attached a patch to clean up the call sites for FuncCal
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:09:19AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
> > Per suggestions and lots of help from Andrew Gierth, please find
> > attached a patch to clean up the call sites for FuncCall nodes, which
> > I'd like to expand centrally rather tha
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:09:19AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
> > Per suggestions and lots of help from Andrew Gierth, please find
> > attached a patch to clean up the call sites for FuncCall nodes, which
> > I'd like to expand centrally rather tha
e part of the spec.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Post
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 09:12:41PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 09:51:46AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Andrew Gierth asked me to send this out as his email is in a parlous
> > state at the moment. My comments will follow in re
t; > everything we list is a byproduct of a standard build, not some other tool.
> > "man gitignore" says
>
> You can use .git/info/exclude for a personal per project setup, too.
Added to http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Working_with_Git
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter h
g
code should be affected.)
Since LATERAL is new in 9.3, I think the pros and cons of these choices
should be considered now, rather than being allowed to slide by unexamined.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: dav
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:40:45PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:15:27AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:12:37PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > David Fetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:29:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:12:37PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:29:43PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > Please find attached a patch which implements the SQL standard
> > > UN
501 - 600 of 2082 matches
Mail list logo
