Re: [HACKERS] [Pgsphere-dev] GIST index concurrency concern

2004-11-09 Thread Oleg Bartunov
list. Thanks, Daniel Regards, Oleg _____ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83 ---

Re: [HACKERS] sp-gist porting to postgreSQL

2004-11-09 Thread Oleg Bartunov
ly be less amount of study (and this is what GiST and SP-GiST is all about if I correctly understand ). Please let me know your opinions regarding to this. Thanks Ramy Regards, Oleg _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.resea

Re: [HACKERS] sp-gist porting to postgreSQL

2004-11-10 Thread Oleg Bartunov
as soon as they support different operations. I don't know if it's possible to have them for the same operation but for different conditions. Thanks Ramy -Original Message- From: Oleg Bartunov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 12:35 AM To: Ramy M. Hass

Re: [HACKERS] [Pgsphere-dev] GIST index concurrency concern

2004-11-10 Thread Oleg Bartunov
s in advance, Patrick On Tuesday 09 November 2004 22:08, Oleg Bartunov wrote: Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Daniel, concurrency is a big issue of current implementation of GiST. But it should don't bite you for READ ops ! -hackers mailing list is a very relevant mailing list for Gi

Re: [HACKERS] sp-gist porting to postgreSQL

2004-11-10 Thread Oleg Bartunov
, but this is what I see. I would appreciate your opinions regarding to this design issue. Teodor is rather busy right now, but he certainly knows better GiST internals, so we'll wait his comments. Thanks Ramy -Original Message----- From: Oleg Bartunov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [HACKERS] ltree PostgreSQL Module

2004-11-11 Thread Oleg Bartunov
rs/F/Fasch,_Johann_Friedrich Kind regards John -Original Message- From: Oleg Bartunov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 8:48 PM To: John Hansen Cc: Teodor Sigaev; Pgsql Hackers Subject: Re: ltree PostgreSQL Module John, On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, John Hansen wrote: Hell

Re: [HACKERS] ltree PostgreSQL Module

2004-11-11 Thread Oleg Bartunov
help you. Kind Regards, John Hansen Regards, Oleg _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sai.msu.su/~m

Re: [HACKERS] ltree PostgreSQL Module

2004-11-11 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Referencia/Bibliotecas/Nacionales','/','.')); ERROR: syntax error at position 14 near "?" I've also found that topics contain , as in the DMOZ Topic: Top/Arts/Music/Composition/Composers/F/Fasch,_Johann_Friedrich Kind regards John -Original Message-

Re: [HACKERS] ltree PostgreSQL Module

2004-11-11 Thread Oleg Bartunov
rk on ltree now. ... John Regards, Oleg _____ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-

[HACKERS] 8.0 press release

2004-11-12 Thread Oleg Bartunov
ver 3. Links to companies offering commercial support This way we'll support local postgresql community and give equal chance for commercial companies. Regards, Oleg _____ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 press release

2004-11-12 Thread Oleg Bartunov
-Josh Regards, Oleg _____ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 press release

2004-11-12 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Please join [EMAIL PROTECTED] where this has been being reviewed, critisized and discussed for the past month or so :( just joined :) On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Oleg Bartunov wrote: Josh, what is a status of press release http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 press release

2004-11-12 Thread Oleg Bartunov
resql community and give equal chance for commercial companies. Regards, Oleg _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [HACKERS] GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes

2004-11-15 Thread Oleg Bartunov
t to be fixed anyway. -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org Regards, Oleg _____ Oleg Bart

Re: [HACKERS] Adding a suffix array index

2004-11-19 Thread Oleg Bartunov
ut updating a large index covering all the indexes values in the column. Is it conceivable to create such an index "cluster"? 2. Does someone know of interesting documentation (perhaps in the form of interesting code comments) which I should read, as a basis for creating a non-standard

Re: [HACKERS] Adding a suffix array index

2004-11-19 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Troels Arvin wrote: Hello Oleg, On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 15:35 +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote: your project looks very attractive. Thanks. In principle, suffix array should be implemented using GiST framework. But in a previous conversation between the two of us, you wrote that the

[HACKERS] tsearch2 documentation additions

2004-12-02 Thread Oleg Bartunov
_ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83 ---(end of

Re: [pgsql-ru-general] [HACKERS] Final call for translation updates

2005-01-04 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Oleg _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83 ---(end of

Re: [pgsql-ru-general] [HACKERS] Final call for translation updates

2005-01-07 Thread Oleg Bartunov
traut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: January 06, 2005 3:48 AM Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 05:38 schrieb Oleg Bartunov: Serguei, I have translations (I didn't touch libpq, psql in work, other files seems complete) available from http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/oddmuse/ Let me know when you ha

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 portability bug

2005-01-11 Thread Oleg Bartunov
bly require initdb, at least for those as are using tsearch2. Thoughts anyone? regards, tom lane Regards, Oleg _____ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical I

Re: [HACKERS] It's OSCON Submission time again!

2005-01-20 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Hi there, I'm willing to help anybody to prepare tutorials or paper about full text search in postgresql and other our contrib modules. Regards, Oleg _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of Ast

Re: [HACKERS] improved support for compounds in tsearch2

2005-01-25 Thread Oleg Bartunov
ictionary. Chris Regards, Oleg _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-

[HACKERS]

2005-01-25 Thread Oleg Bartunov
iew.com/go/osdn_nl ___ OpenFTS-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openfts-general Regards, Oleg _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, host

[HACKERS] strange 'vacuum verbose analyze' behaviour

2005-01-27 Thread Oleg Bartunov
TAIL: 0 index row versions were removed. 0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable. CPU 67.12s/228.84u sec elapsed 1010.20 sec. INFO: "usno": removed 2796013 row versions in 17809 pages DETAIL: CPU 1.50s/1.82u sec elapsed 19.98 sec. Regards, Oleg ___

Re: [HACKERS] strange 'vacuum verbose analyze' behaviour

2005-01-27 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Oleg Bartunov writes: Day ago we run 'vacuum verbose analyze;' and now we're observing strange output (see below). We see many repeated passes through the table 'usno' and all indices (2). Nothing strange about it: that's how

Re: [HACKERS] strange 'vacuum verbose analyze' behaviour

2005-01-28 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Oleg Bartunov wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Oleg Bartunov writes: Day ago we run 'vacuum verbose analyze;' and now we're observing strange output (see below). We see many repeated passes through the table 'usno' and all indices (2).

Re: [HACKERS] strange 'vacuum verbose analyze' behaviour

2005-01-28 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Oleg Bartunov writes: Memory growth stoped at 1.8Gb PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 20458 postgres 15 0 1902m 503m 204m D 5.9 49.7 13:59.61 postmaster Index-related memory leak maybe? What are the indexes on this

Re: [HACKERS] strange 'vacuum verbose analyze' behaviour

2005-01-29 Thread Oleg Bartunov
wsdb > vacuum-wsdb.log 2>&1& -rw-r--r--1 postgres postgres48784 Jan 28 15:03 vacuum-wsdb.log Is there something I could do ? Oleg On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Oleg Bartunov wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Oleg Bartunov writes: Memory growth stoped at 1.8Gb PID USE

[HACKERS] Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0)

2005-01-29 Thread Oleg Bartunov
- ra | real | dec| real | bmag | real | rmag | real | ipix | bigint | Indexes: "ipix_ind" btree (ipix) "radec_idx1" btree (ra, "dec") Regards, Oleg

Re: [HACKERS] Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0)

2005-01-29 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Oleg Bartunov writes: I tried run 'vacuumdb -v -z -f wsdb > vacuum-wsdb.log 2>&1&' I'm confused. The log trace you showed us before appeared to be from a non-FULL vacuum, but here you're saying it's VACUUM FULL. Which

Re: [HACKERS] Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0)

2005-01-29 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Oleg Bartunov writes: On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: I'm confused. The log trace you showed us before appeared to be from a non-FULL vacuum, but here you're saying it's VACUUM FULL. Which is it ... or did you change? Yes, first time

Re: [HACKERS] Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0)

2005-01-29 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Oleg Bartunov wrote: On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Oleg Bartunov writes: On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: I'm confused. The log trace you showed us before appeared to be from a non-FULL vacuum, but here you're saying it's VACUUM FULL. Which is it

Re: [HACKERS] Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0)

2005-02-01 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Oleg Bartunov wrote: Seems, postmaster eats expected amount of memory now ! Will see how long it will proceeded. Probably, my case should be documented somewhere. just to inform - vacuum took almost 48 hours ! Another possibility is to use CLUSTER or a rewriting ALTER TABLE

Re: [HACKERS] Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0)

2005-02-01 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Oleg Bartunov writes: I see that pgsql_tmp/ contains files, looks like clustered table. What postmaster is doing if disk usage doesn't changed ? Most likely doing a disk-based merge sort ... just interesting - multiway, in-place or just place merge

Re: [HACKERS] Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0)

2005-02-01 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Oleg Bartunov writes: I see that pgsql_tmp/ contains files, looks like clustered table. What postmaster is doing if disk usage doesn't changed ? Most likely doing a disk-based merge sort ... so, it uses 'work_mem' as a buffer ?

Re: [HACKERS] Crash when inserting gist records, or creating index

2005-02-03 Thread Oleg Bartunov
80fe8b3 in BackendStartup () #20 0x80fdb7d in ServerLoop () #21 0x80fd750 in PostmasterMain () #22 0x80dd93e in main () #23 0x2ab8c9cb in ?? () (gdb) Would you have any advice for me? Many thanks, -Robin Chauhan ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subs

Re: [HACKERS] "external indices" ...

2005-02-08 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Oleg _____ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +00

Re: [HACKERS] "external indices" ...

2005-02-08 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Oleg Bartunov wrote: Marc, On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote: I believe that this is what Oleg et al tap into with the tsearch2 stuff, no? I have someone asking me about it, and want to make sure that I'm telling hi

[HACKERS] any presentation, tutorial on postgresql ?

2005-02-11 Thread Oleg Bartunov
I was asked to give a lectures (a whole day) about PostgreSQL in Moscow, Russia. Since I'm new to such kind of activity I'n looking for any presentations, curlliculum for starting. Regards, Oleg _ Ole

[HACKERS] improved support for compounds in tsearch2

2005-01-25 Thread Oleg Bartunov
.su/~megera/postgres/gist/tsearch/V2/expand_query_8.0.patch.gz Regards, Oleg _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83

Re: [HACKERS] Query optimizer 8.0.1 (and 8.0)

2005-02-13 Thread Oleg Bartunov
terns, a larger sample allows them to be "less wrong" enough to give a better hint to the planner. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings Regards, Oleg _

[HACKERS] how to make table inherits another ?

2005-02-16 Thread Oleg Bartunov
2617283 | 2417279 |1 did I miss something ? Regards, Oleg _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.ms

Re: [HACKERS] how to make table inherits another ?

2005-02-16 Thread Oleg Bartunov
at 11:48:54PM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote: Hi there, is't possible to make table to be inherited from another table in case both tables already exist. I tried to insert record to pg_inherits, but it doesn't helped. openfts=# select * from pg_inherits; inhrelid | inhparent

Re: [HACKERS] how to make table inherits another ?

2005-02-16 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Oleg Bartunov writes: I know this. I need to create inheritance for already created tables. There is no way to do this using alter table, so I tried to define it by hand :) Did you remember to set relhassubclass for the parent table? AFAIR, all that you really

[HACKERS] slow mail server ?

2005-02-21 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Marc, Below is a message I just received and I'm wondering what's a problem of such delay ? 5 days is too much :) Regards, Oleg _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg As

Re: [HACKERS] slow mail server ?

2005-02-21 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Oleg Bartunov wrote: Marc, Below is a message I just received and I'm wondering what's a problem of such delay ? 5 days is too much :) It was posted by someone not subscribed to the mailing list, and had to be manually a

Re: [HACKERS] serial as FK ?

2005-02-28 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Richard Huxton wrote: Oleg Bartunov wrote: Hi there, what's wrong to use SERIAL as FK without explicit PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE ? qq=# create table t1( id serial); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "t1_id_seq" for "serial" colum

[HACKERS] serial as FK ?

2005-02-28 Thread Oleg Bartunov
-TABLES Regards, Oleg _____ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83 ---(end o

Re: [HACKERS] serial as FK ?

2005-02-28 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Stephan Szabo wrote: On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Oleg Bartunov wrote: what's wrong to use SERIAL as FK without explicit PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE ? Serial isn't enough to guarantee uniqueness as required by foreign keys. you're certainly right ! Regards,

[HACKERS] cluster table by two-column index ?

2005-03-03 Thread Oleg Bartunov
I'm wondering, is there any sense to cluster table using two-column index ? Regards, Oleg _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (R

[HACKERS] consequent btree index scans optimizations ?

2005-03-03 Thread Oleg Bartunov
s clustered hit ratio is very good and execution time is < 0.5s. Regards, Oleg _____ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai

[HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ?

2000-09-16 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Oleg PS. forget to mention that collation works fine _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83

Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ?

2000-09-16 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 11:23:33 -0400 > From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte sup

Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ?

2000-09-16 Thread Oleg Bartunov
nt Peter's changes could cause the problem Regards, Oleg On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 13:21:20 -0400 > From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ?

2000-09-17 Thread Oleg Bartunov
nt use any "-funsigned-chars" like options ! Regards, Oleg On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 13:48:37 -0400 > From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Oleg Bartunov <[EMA

Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ?

2000-09-17 Thread Oleg Bartunov
ions Tatsuo, am I right and what critical sections in backend/regex/regcomp.c ? Regards, Oleg > -- > Tatsuo Ishii > _ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institu

Re: [HACKERS] jsonb and nested hstore

2014-03-12 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Also, GiST index is faster for create/update operations. I really hope we will improve jsonb indexing in the next one-two releases. For now I'd suggest people index expressional indexes to index just interesting keys or use GiST. On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 12 Březen

Re: [HACKERS] jsonb and nested hstore

2014-03-12 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Oleg Bartunov wrote: >> Also, GiST index is faster for create/update operations. I really hope we >> will >> improve jsonb indexing in the next one-two releases. For now I'd s

Re: [HACKERS] jsonb and nested hstore

2014-03-13 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Greg Stark wrote: >> >> Well these are just normal gin and gist indexes. If we want to come up >> with new index operator classess we can still do that and keep the old >> ones if necessary. Even that se

Re: [HACKERS] jsonb and nested hstore

2014-03-14 Thread Oleg Bartunov
VODKA index will have no lenght limitation. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 13 Březen 2014, 23:39, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Greg Stark wrote: >>> It does sound like the main question here is which opclass should be >>> the default. From

Re: [HACKERS] jsonb and nested hstore

2014-03-14 Thread Oleg Bartunov
9.5 may too optimistic :) On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 03/14/2014 04:52 AM, Oleg Bartunov wrote: >> VODKA index will have no lenght limitation. > > Yeah, so I think we go with what we have, and tell people "if you're > hitting these length

Re: [HACKERS] jsonb status

2014-03-17 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Alexander will take a look on TriConsistent function. On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 03/16/2014 04:10 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Andrew Dunstan >> wrote: >>> >>> I'll be travelling a good bit of tomorrow (Friday), but I hope P

Re: [HACKERS] jsonb status

2014-03-23 Thread Oleg Bartunov
It's easy to add support of other operations to hash_ops, so it will be on par with default GIN opclass, at the price of bigger size. We can add it later to contrib/jsonbext. I'm mostly worrying about changing semantics of scalar. On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Sa

Re: [HACKERS] Doing better at HINTing an appropriate column within errorMissingColumn()

2014-03-28 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Very interesting idea, I'd think about optionally add similarity hinting support to psql tab. With, say, 80% of similarity matching, it shouldn't be very annoying. For interactive usage there is no risk of slowdown. On Mar 27, 2014 11:11 PM, "Peter Geoghegan" wrote: > With the addition of

[HACKERS] json(b) equality rules

2014-04-03 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Hi there, I'm wondering if we should follow all js equility rules as nicely visualized in http://strilanc.com/visualization/2014/03/27/Better-JS-Equality-Table.html Oleg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postg

Re: [HACKERS] json(b) equality rules

2014-04-03 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Sure, we don't follow. I mean should we add to documentation such matrices. Oleg On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm wondering if we should follow all js equility rules as > nicely visualized in > http://strilanc.com/visualiza

Re: [HACKERS] json(b) equality rules

2014-04-03 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Well, we don't supported Infinity and NaN in json(b), as well as Json standard :) Now we need a script, which generated nice html table. On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Yeb Havinga wrote: > On 2014-04-03 09:40, Oleg Bartunov wrote: >> >> Sure, we don't follow

Re: [HACKERS] Default gin operator class of jsonb failing with index row size maximum reached

2014-04-08 Thread Oleg Bartunov
We are working to avoid this limitation. On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> Documentation of jsonb tells that jsonb documents should be kept at a >> reasonable size to reduce lock contention, but there is no menti

Re: [HACKERS] Default gin operator class of jsonb failing with index row size maximum reached

2014-04-08 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Oleg Bartunov writes: >> We are working to avoid this limitation. > > What do you mean by that ... do you see it as something that could be > fixed quickly, or is this a long-term improvement project? Unfortunately, It's

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Include planning time in EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.

2014-04-17 Thread Oleg Bartunov
I found a bit confusing, when planning time is greater total time, so +1 for execution time. On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: >> Where are we on this? I still see: > >> test=> EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT 1; >>Q

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 release notes

2014-05-04 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Bruce, you forgot Alexander Korotkov, who contributed jsonb_hash_ops opclass for GIN. Something like "Alexander Korotkov introduced an elegant jsonb_hash ops for GIN, which competes with MongoDB performance in contains operator". Here is a link to discussion - http://www.postgresql.org/message-i

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 release notes

2014-05-04 Thread Oleg Bartunov
I agree, no mongo :) On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote: >> >> Bruce, >> >> you forgot Alexander Korotkov, who contributed jsonb_hash_ops opclass >> for GIN. Something like >>

Re: [HACKERS] Wanted: jsonb on-disk representation documentation

2014-05-06 Thread Oleg Bartunov
FYI, http://obartunov.livejournal.com/178495.html This is hash based gin opclass for hstore with all operators support. It's pity we had no time to do the same for jsonb, but we may include it and couple of other opclasses to contrib/jsonx. Oleg On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Peter Geoghegan

Re: [HACKERS] default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)

2014-05-10 Thread Oleg Bartunov
+1 but bit confused with json instead of jsonb On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 05/10/2014 04:42 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> >> >> >> The main difference between the two opclasses from a user's standpoint is >> not whether they hash or not. The big difference is

Re: [HACKERS] jsonb access operators inefficiency

2014-05-30 Thread Oleg Bartunov
The patch really improves access performance to jsonb. On the delicious bookmarks I got 5 times better performance.Now jsonb outperforms json on simple access (slide 12 of pgcon presentation) by 103 times ! Oleg On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Teodor Sigaev wrote: > Hi! > > jsonb operators ->

Re: [HACKERS] Why is it "JSQuery"?

2014-06-06 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Jsquery - is QUERY language, JsonPath - is language to EXTRACT json parts. On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:34 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jun 5, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> My understanding is that it's meant to be analogous to tsquery. >> >> At first glance, JsonPath doesn't seem

<    5   6   7   8   9   10