On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Kevin Grittner
wrote:
> Edward Muller wrote:
>
>> Looking for comments ...
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/be937d3a7a5323c73b6e
>>
>> We'd like to get this, or something like it, into 9.2
>
> If you want it to be seriously considered, you should post the patch
> to this list, which makes it part of the permanent archives and
> indicates your willingness to place the code under the PostgreSQL
> license.
inline
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch#Patch_submission
I think this was done right.
>
[snip]
>
> Any chance you could help review patches in the CF in progress, to
> help get others' time freed up sooner?:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/inprogress
Well, I'm totally new to the code base, I don't write in *C* very
often (probably obvious from my patch). Maybe over time
>
> It's a good way to become familiar with the process, so that you can
> better move your own patch along.
>
> -Kevin
>
user_signal.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
