Hi,
Attached is a patch to make it build with OpenSSL 1.1.0.
There is probably a minor problem on windows where the name of the
dlls got changed. Someone probably should look into that.
Kurt
>From efd7aa3499b2b4eedd4c4d4164b75175f3c10d2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kurt Roeckx
Date:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:19:56AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:25:47AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> I think a simplistic solution is to declare the variable volatile.
> >> Would you test that and report back?
&g
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:25:47AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> I think a simplistic solution is to declare the variable volatile.
> Would you test that and report back?
Yes, making oldcontext volatile makes the test pass.
It now fails at the ECPG-Check stage, but it seems that is a common
p
Hi,
I've been trying a gcc 4.4 snapshot (20081213) on buildfarm member
panda. It gets a abort during the pl-install-check part.
Here is the backtrace:
Core was generated by `postgres: build-farm pl_regression [local] SELECT '.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
[New process 3588]
#0 0x0
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:03:39PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> Patches committed, please re-enable the back branches so we can
>> see what happens.
>
> I have tested this back as far as 8.0, and all seems OK.
7.4 passed too.
Kurt
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@po
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:11:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:59:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-03/msg00292.php
>
> > This patch atl
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:59:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I did try the patch. It fails just the same way.
>
> Hmph. So we still don't know why 8.2 and 8.3 behave differently ...
> [ pokes around ... ] Hah
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:59:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I did try the patch. It fails just the same way.
>
> Hmph. So we still don't know why 8.2 and 8.3 behave differently ...
> [ pokes around ... ] Hah
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 03:52:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:52:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Please try that patch and see what it fixes pre-8.3.
>
> > No, returnValue contains the same valu
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:52:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 8.2 and 8.3 actually get the same value in fmgr_oldstyle(), it just
> > seems they do something else with it somewhere else.
>
> Doh. I'll bet the d
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 03:05:31PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > No, this has nothing to do with CFLAGS. It's calling a function which
> > returns something other than it actually returns.
>
> Yeah but apparently gcc 4.3 is working in 8.3
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:05:14PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:53:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I did some tests with gcc 4.3 on the branches from 7.4 t
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:53:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I did some tests with gcc 4.3 on the branches from 7.4 to 8.3 and head.
> > 8.3 and head don't have a problem. All others failed in the
> > ContribCheck state.
&
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:53:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I did some tests with gcc 4.3 on the branches from 7.4 to 8.3 and head.
> > 8.3 and head don't have a problem. All others failed in the
> > ContribCheck state.
&
Hi,
I did some tests with gcc 4.3 on the branches from 7.4 to 8.3 and head.
8.3 and head don't have a problem. All others failed in the
ContribCheck state.
You can see the results on buildfarm member panda.
Kurt
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make c
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 07:23:40PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Log Message:
> > > ---
> > > Don't need -Wno-error anymore, because flex is no longer producing
> > > warnings.
> >
> > I see this patch on
Hi,
Has anyone tried to use the huge tlb support of the Linux 2.6 kernel?
If you compile the kernel with support for it (CONFIG_HUGETLBFS), you
can call shmget() with a SHM_HUGETLB parameter so that it will use
larger pages.
Has anyone tried to use it? Is it worth trying to set it up?
Kurt
-
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 02:52:28PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Bruce summarized the problem pretty well when he said that if Postgres
> > is being run as a non-root user then one non-root user's "postgres" is
> > as good as any other non-root user's "postg
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:32:34PM -0800, Joel Miller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to get a local mirror of the cvs repository, but my
> connection attempts using rsync to cvsup.postgresql.org are always
> refused when I try to actually retrieve the pgsql-cvs collection. I tried
> to use r
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 03:03:28PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> >
> >well that is good news, can you tell me what version of linux you are
> >using and what gcc version also. I will let
> >Martin know.
>
>
> lionfish is a stock Debian/Sarge box (a cobalt cube) with gcc 3.3.5.
Martin is
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:35:31PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> but it seems this is some BSD'ism that we don't need to support if the
> standard doesn't say so.
I think the Linux manpage is more informative about this:
The functions snprintf and vsnprintf do not write more than
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:06:03AM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>
> The new gcc visibility stuff gives you way of shrinking the symbol
> table and improving performance.
And you really should start with making use of static, which has
about the same effect, except that the visibility stuf
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:59:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I kinda suspect that the cmpb test is a no-op or loss on all
> Intelish processors: it can only be a win if you expect a lot
> of contention for the spin lock, but in percentage terms we still
> have a very low conflict rate, so in most
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:49:40PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> So far, we have tended to use -fpic to compile position-independent code
> until we have received some sort of overflow that forced the use of
> -fPIC. Since 8.0, the makefiles to build shared libraries are also
> available to
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 12:58:28PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Are we still bumping the libpq major version number for 8.0.2? I think
> it is a bad idea because we will require too many client apps to be
> recompiled, and we have had few problem reports.
>
> We do need to bump the major version
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:29:46PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > Does initdb call pg_snprintf directly? Or does it call some
> > libpq function that calls it?
>
> With the current CVS, initdb calls pg_snprintf() on my platform which
> doe
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 04:49:23PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> In fact, based on the few complaints we have heard about the current
> situation, I am sure we are going to get many more complaints if we bump
> up the major version in 8.0.2.
I think it's better to have people complain that they
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 12:48:00PM -0700, Robert Creager wrote:
> When grilled further on (Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:40:02 +0100),
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confessed:
>
> > > Attached is a patch against HEAD for your review.
> >
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:12:32AM -0700, Robert Creager wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> I goofed with the patch I submitted last year for adding 'week' capability to
> the date_trunc function.
>
> Attached is a patch against HEAD for your review.
It has this comment in it:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:53:08PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Applied.
The configure test is a little broken. It needs to quote the
$'s.
I've rewritten the test a little.
Kurt
Index: config/c-library.m4
===
RCS file: /proje
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 07:36:52PM +0100, Reinhard Max wrote:
>
> The problem is, that the heimdal implementation of kerberos5 used on
> sles8 needs an extra include statement for com_err.h in
> src/interfaces/libpq/fe-auth.c to get the prototype for
> error_message(), while on newer SUSE-relea
> pgbuildfarm=# select name, operating_system, stage, count from buildsystems
> b, (select sysname, stage, count(*) as count from build_status where log ~
> 'tablespace "testspace" is not empty' group by sysname, stage) as s where
> s.sysname=b.name;
Note that the expected log has that as error
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:21:36PM +0100, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> I'm in process of releasing a PL/Java based on the latest 8.0.0rc1. My
> Linux box is x86_64 based and even if I can cross-compile a 32 bit
> binary on it, I feel it's not really the same thing. Normally I use the
> "testdrive" o
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:37:42PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Once RC1 is out and the build farm has picked it up, we should start
> filling out our little table with the build farm results and then look
> for ways to fill the holes. Does the build farm turn on all the
> compiler optio
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 06:12:36PM +0200, Jos van Roosmalen wrote:
>
> CREATE TABLE TESTTABLE (ATTR1 INT8,ATTR2 INT4,ATTR3 TIMESTAMP);
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TESTINDEX ON TESTTABLE(ATTR1,ATTR2,ATTR3);
> EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM TESTTABLE WHERE ATTR1=1 AND ATTR2=2 AND
> ATTR3='2004-01-01';
try:
expl
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 10:00:05PM +0200, Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:35:15PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
> > I do know of important differences in compilers in this regard. You can
> > (for instance) have 80 bit floating point on one compiler using double
> > but it
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:34:21PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Here are my results on Linux 2.6.1 using cvs version 1.7.
> >
> > Those times with > 20 seconds, you really hear the disk go crazy.
> >
> > And I have the feeling som
Here are my results on Linux 2.6.1 using cvs version 1.7.
Those times with > 20 seconds, you really hear the disk go crazy.
And I have the feeling something must be wrong. Those results
are reproducible.
Kurt
Simple write timing:
write0.139558
Compare fsync times
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 02:22:10PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, what better test do you suggest? Right now, there has been no
> testing of these.
I suggest you start by doing atleast preallocating a 16 MB file
and do the tests on that, to atleast be somewhat simular to what
WAL does.
I h
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 01:50:32PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I'm not sure I believe these numbers at all... my experience is that
> > getting trustworthy disk I/O numbers is *not* easy.
>
> These numbers were reproducable on all the platforms I tested.
It's not because they are reproducable
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:33:17PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> >The postmaster's use of nominally unsafe stuff in signal
> >handlers is not
> >and never has been a problem, because there is only one place in the
> >main loop where signals are unblocked, thus no possibility for
> >something
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 09:12:52PM +1100, Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Was just discussing the issues related to the above off list with Magnus:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers-win32/2004-03/msg00041.php
>
> Whilst we can think of a number of work-arounds (the simplest be
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 01:57:15AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Claudio Natoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Under Win32, localtime returns NULL for dates pre 1970.
>
> Count on Microsloth to get it wrong :-(
I had a discussion about time_t some weeks ago. There is nothing
in the standard that say
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:02:34PM -0500, Pete wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if this is the correct place to make a feature request. If
> not hopefully I can be kindly pointed in that direction.
>
> I have several project that use MySQL and I would like to port them to
> PostgreSQL unfortunatel
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:37:09PM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
>
> - if a backend holds the BufMgrLock, it will never try to
> LWLockAcquire() a per-buffer meta data lock, due to the risk of
> deadlock (and the loss in concurrency if we got blocked waiting
> while still holding
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:58:54PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> >[IP6] [Option Start] If the specified address family is AF_INET6 or
> >AF_UNSPEC, standard IPv6 text forms described in inet_ntop() are
> >valid. [Option End]
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:58:54PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> I read it to mean that abbreviated forms (via inet_addr()) are OK for
> AF_INET but not for AF_INET6 (via inet_pton())
>
But we use AF_UNSPEC/PF_UNSPEC.
Kurt
---(end of broadcast)
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:53:19PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Greg Stark wrote:
> > a.b.c
> >
> > When a three-part address is specified, the last part shall be interpreted
> > as a 16-bit quantity and placed in the rightmost two bytes of the network
> > address. This make
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:52:19PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> A few points.
>
> 1. clarification of my IRC comment: A quick examination seems to shaw
> that we use the native getaddrinfo() where it exists, otherwise we use
> our own, which in turn calls inet_ntoa().
> 2. ip6 has a well de
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 09:25:14AM +0100, ivan wrote:
>
> but what about default style ?
> first time when i saw DateStyle i thought that i can use it like C/C++
> function strftime. I would be not bad idea to have custom data style :)
Use to_char() function to put it in any format you want.
Ku
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:17:31AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> Important fact left out of the problem description: The issue happens when
> *two or more* intensive queries are running simultaneosly.
So two queries are enough to get this problem?
I assume the tables are so big that they don't
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:30:13AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> Linux Versions Reported: RH and Gentoo reported, Kernels 2.4.18 to 2.4.22
> Not tested on other distros/kernels. Kernels are SMP-enabled.
Does the same problem show with an SMP kernel on an UP system?
> When a query is
I find this a little strange:
select date_part('year', '0002-01-01 BC'::date);
date_part
---
-1
It seems 1 BC and 0 are the same year.
In backend/utils/adt/formatting.c:
if (tmfc.bc)
{
if (tm->tm_year > 0)
tm->tm_year = -(
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:24:23PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm trying to change all the walkers and mutators to have a more
> > strict prototype. I had to do this with lots of casts.
> >
> > I don&#
I'm trying to change all the walkers and mutators to have a more
strict prototype. I had to do this with lots of casts.
I don't really like the idea of having all those generic pointer
types (Node * and void *), but currently see no better way to deal
with it.
I attached the patch.
Kurt
Index
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 05:35:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 04:54:54PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> (a AND b) OR (a AND c)
> >> expands by repeated application of the distributive law to
> >&
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 04:54:54PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Currently, this is accomplished by the roundabout method of converting
> the WHERE clause to CNF (AND-of-ORs) and then simplifying duplicate
> sub-clauses within an OR:
> (a AND b) OR (a AND c)
> expands by repeated application of th
It seems that on_shmem_exit() first argument is a function that
needs to be called back. The function itself doesn't have a
prototype, but it's called with and int and Datum as argument
when it's used.
It seems that almost none of the functions it calls will actually
need any argument, I could on
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:27:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I've been able to reproduce this on one of my machines, and it's nasty.
>
> > In that case I'm confused about why this code compiles on my machine:
>
> What compiler are
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:30:02PM -0600, Seum-Lim Gan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The ident server we currently use is pidentd 3.0.16
> from :
> http://www.lysator.liu.se/ or
> ftp://ftp.lysator.liu.se/pub/ident/servers
The ChangeLog of it says: Solaris 8 (including IPv6) support
added.
But I have a feeli
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:30:02PM -0600, Seum-Lim Gan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The ident server we currently use is pidentd 3.0.16
The only I could find in a short time was oidentd. It says it
runs on Linux, *BSD and Solaris. http://dev.ojnk.net/
I've been told that FreeBSD's inetd's internal identd
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 02:09:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> [ moved to -hackers ]
>
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> We are also wonder if there is a version of Ident server
> >> that the PostgreSQL community knows that will work
> >> with IPv6.
>
> > That is the big question. I
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 08:22:30PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> One variable I didn't think to ask about is whether you are running
> NTP. In my experience an ntp daemon that has achieved lock will never
> step the clock back by even 1 usec (it's supposed to use much more
> subtle methods than that
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 04:19:05PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> UCS-2 is impractical without some *extremely* wide-ranging changes in
> the backend. To take just the most obvious point, doesn't it require
> allowing embedded zero bytes in text strings?
If you're going to use unicode in the rest of
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 08:40:57PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > I've always thought unicode was enough to even represent Japanese. Then
> > the client encoding can be something else that we can convert to. In any
> > way, the encoding of the
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 12:25:32PM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> If there are any other GCC warning flags anyone else feels would be
> useful, let me know.
I find the following also useful:
-Wcast-align
-Wcast-qual
-Wpointer-arith
-Wstrict-prototypes
And maybe:
-Waggregate-return
Kurt
-
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 11:32:18PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> I suspect it might be because I'm running in a jail'd environment, but
> what should I be looking at to confirm?
>
> could not create socket for statistics collector: Protocol not supported
You probably shouldn't worry about i
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:49:28AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It's still logging the "recycled transation log file". Is that
> > send to stdout instead of stderr maybe?
>
> No, it all goes to stderr. But that
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 04:08:28PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I just installed a 7.4 on windows/cygwin. I restored a dump but
> > ran out of disk space during the creating of an index. In psql I
> > saw the "
I just installed a 7.4 on windows/cygwin. I restored a dump but
ran out of disk space during the creating of an index. In psql I
saw the "ERROR: could not extend relation ".
>From that point on it seems to have stopped logging most things.
The ERROR and HINT are not in the log file, it stop
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:04:23PM -0500, Derek Morr wrote:
>
> the
> machine I'm using (a V880 running 2.8) has no IPv6 address on any of its
> interfaces.
So the for loop over the addresses that are returned should go
over both socket() and bind() instead of only socket(). And
probably conne
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:39:32PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jan Wieck wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > He found that write() itself didn't encourage the kernel to write the
> > > buffers to disk fast enough. I think the final solution will be to use
> > > fsync or O_SYNC.
> >
> > write(
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:35:31PM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
> For sure the sync() needs to be replaced by the discussed fsync() of
> recently written files. And I think the algorithm how much and how often
> to flush can be significantly improved. But after all, this does not
> change the real ch
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:32:38AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Are we using an api that only returns nslookup responses and not
> > /etc/hosts entries ? At least on AIX it looks like it.
>
> We use getaddrinfo(), or if that doesn't exist get
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:36:38PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Kurt, this patch added special includes for testing un.h, and I believe
> it caused regression failures for the statistics collector. Is it still
> needed? What platform is this?
It's a linux system with an (old) libc5. It's st
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 03:42:39PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Is it possible that that kernel considers binding to an IPv6 port to
> >> conflict with binding to the "same" port number as an IPv4 port?
>
> Actually, I think that that may be expected behavior depending on the
> vintage of the kerne
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:49:54PM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> >Jan Wieck wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>How portable is getrusage()? Could the postmaster issue that
> >>frequently for RUSAGE_CHILDREN and leave the result somewhere in the
> >>shared memory for whoever is concerned?
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:47:17PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
>
> --On Thursday, November 06, 2003 07:43:07 +1100 Jason Godden
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 06:25 am, Markus Bertheau wrote:
> >>? ???, 05.11.2003, ? 16:25, Tom Lane ?:
> >>> > +#define HEXVALUE(c) (
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 11:59:05PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, I have committed changes to release.sgml so most complex entries
> have a paragraph describing the change. You can see the result at:
* Full support for IPv6 connections and IPv6 address data types
Prior releases
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 08:27:10AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Ports list updated:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
>
> Should I mention Solaris as 2.6 or 5.6?
Normally you speak about Solaris 2.5, 2.6, 7, 8 and 9.
Which are also known as
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 08:27:52PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> I have seen following regression failure with current(I cvs up'ed 10
> minutes ago). Any thought? This is Linux kernel 2.4.22 with glibc
> 2.2.4.
Maybe the change of TZ (summer to winter time) tonight caused
this.
Kurt
---
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 08:42:36PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I am confused by your report. I have success from Solaris kernel 5.8.
> I see 2.6 mentioned, and I know there is Solaris 7-9. What does uname
> -a show?
SunOS oink 5.6 Generic_105182-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
Which is the same as So
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 01:03:37PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pgsql$ uname -a
> Linux pergolesi 2.4.22 #1 SMP Mon Aug 25 20:56:25 CEST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> It says i686 but its AMD Opteron:
Just wondering, but does it run in 32 or 64 bit mode? I have a
feeling it's only 32
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:37:32AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
checking build system type... i386-pc-solaris2.6
checking host system type... i386-pc-solaris2.6
checking whi
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 12:46:39AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > I need this small patch so it properly detects I have unix domain
> > sockets. Otherwise no problems.
>
> What system? What happens without the patch? Details, please.
It
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:37:32AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
I need this small patch so it properly detects I have unix domain
sockets. Otherwise no problems.
Kurt
In
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:56:35AM +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> First it should have been discussed before your commitment or at least
> it should be discussed after reversing your change.
>
> I require you to explain me why you committed the change
> with no discussion and little investigation.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:09:22PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Neil Conway writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 13:14, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > > > tablecmds.c: In function `validateForeignKeyConstraint':
> > > > > tablecmds.c:3546: warnin
I've seen this before, and I'm not sure why I get this.
When I run make check, in the top dir, I get:
== removing existing temp installation==
== creating temporary installation==
== initializing database system
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:10:20AM -0700, Kevin Brown wrote:
> > I could go for Jan's idea of putting a random key into the messages,
> > if anyone feels that we should not trust to the kernel to enforce the
> > packet source address restriction. But the memcmp() test seems a clear
> > loser given
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 09:35:11AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Redhat 7.1 says
>
>The file descriptor sockfd must refer to a socket. If the
>socket is of type SOCK_DGRAM then the serv_addr address is
>the address to which datagrams are sent by default, and
>the o
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 04:04:38PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> And I agree with Tom that it is very likely that the IPV4/IPV6 stuff is
> the reason. IIRC the postmaster creates the socket and noone ever does
> bind(2) on it - so it uses it's dynamically assigned port number. Both,
> the collect
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 05:01:54PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
>
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
>
> >It could be useful to have a warning at the following line:
> >
> >if (memcmp(&fromaddr, &pgStatAddr, fromlen))
> >
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:27:58PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
> Did you read this:
> "This means that unless you modify the tools so that compiled
> executables do not make use of the Cygwin library, your compiled
> programs will also have to be free software distributed under the GPL
> with source
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 07:18:57PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Can we allow the IPv6 entries to be in pg_hba.conf but ignore them on
> > > non-IPv6 machines, or allow the connection to fail?
> >
> > I don't see a good way
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 01:39:04AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Doesn't the stats collector use unix domain sockets, not IP?
>
> No. IIRC, we deliberately chose IP/UDP because it had buffering
> behavior we liked.
Once you said it was because not all pla
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:30:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > tablecmds.c: In function `validateForeignKeyConstraint':
> > tablecmds.c:3546: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
> > strict-aliasing rules
>
> Hm. Got any idea what these are really complaining about? I see no
>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:36:53PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I would like every operating system that supports thread-safety to run
> this program and report back the results.
On a Linux system with glibc 2.1:
Your gethostbyname() is _not_ thread-safe
Your getpwuid() is _not_ thread-safe
Yo
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:59:17PM +0200, Tommi Mäkitalo wrote:
>
> psql: FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for host ":::127.0.0.1", user
> "postgres", database "template1"
This is a Linux system that does not have the IPV6_V6ONLY
setsockopt() option. Linux only has this option since 2.4.21
(pre
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 12:04:58PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Lee Kindness writes:
>
> > You don't... and you simply shouldn't care. If there is a_r version
> > available then we should use it - even if the plain version is "safe".
>
> The problem with this is that the automatic determinati
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
