Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest queue

2008-04-12 Thread Nathan Buchanan
I'm just an observer here, but I thought I'd present an idea. Feel free to tell me I'm nuts if you don't like it. It seems to me that there are two main concerns in this area on discussion: 1. How to create a list of patches/review items/etc without adding a significant amount of noise to this

Re: [HACKERS] Not ready for 8.3

2007-05-15 Thread Nathan Buchanan
On 5/15/07, Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: They are not stable. The items should point to the archives, which are supposedly more stable. (I had already fixed one item in PatchStatus this morning). Really it would be much nicer to have links using

[HACKERS] storage of sensor data with Fourier transforms

2007-05-04 Thread Nathan Buchanan
Hello! I have a potential situation where I will have a lot of sensor data coming in very often. (every second or so) The sensor data is from physics type measurements, and will normally follow a slowly changing pattern with sinusoidal disturbances. The overall shape of the data is more

Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it

2006-07-16 Thread Nathan Buchanan
On 7/16/06, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kris Jurka wrote: On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote: [windows buildfarm machines run irregularly] For my part the difficulty is scheduling.As a primarily unix user I understand cron, but have no idea what the windows equivalent is.For my

Re: [HACKERS] Summer of Code Preparation

2006-04-05 Thread Nathan Buchanan
A list of simpler TODOs would be great. I might be interested in doing something (probably w/o the summer of code because I have a summer job). We'll see after exams finish. Please post something about where we can find this TODO list when it is available. Thanks, NathanOn 4/5/06, Jim Nasby

Re: [HACKERS] RSS feeds of CVS revision logs

2005-10-21 Thread Nathan Buchanan
Hi Joshua, I think the RSS feed is a great Idea! (I personally use InfoRss with Mozilla) Though it would be nice to reduce the amount of text before the description (I barely get by the revision number to see the description) maybe formatted CMP:R##: Description... Though I have no idea how