On Thursday 14 February 2013, Manlio Perillo wrote:
Il 14/02/2013 14:06, Albe Laurenz ha scritto:
Manlio Perillo wrote:
Sorry for the question, but where can I find the libpq test suite?
I can not find it in the PostgreSQL sources; it seems that there are
only some examples, in
On Thursday 20 December 2012, Brett Maton wrote:
Hi List,
This might not be the right place to post, but I've got a minor patch for
pg_top and would like to submit it for review.
This project lies on Github:
https://github.com/markwkm/pg_top/
I think, this commit had fixed the
On Sunday 21 October 2012, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2012-10-21 11:49:26 -0400, cbbro...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is a natural sequence (e.g. - a value assigned by nextval()),
that offers a natural place to apply the usual order-imposing ORDER BY
that we are expected to use elsewhere.
On Sunday 21 October 2012, Andres Freund wrote:
On Sunday, October 21, 2012 07:24:52 PM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
why does the client have to be involved, exactly?
Suppose you have something like
CREATE TABLE positionlog(
...
And you want to insert multiple values in one roundtrip *and* know
On Sunday 21 October 2012, Vik Reykja wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
a...@2ndquadrant.comwrote:
Note: INSERT … RETURNING doesn't accept an ORDER BY clause.
Would anyone be opposed to somebody - say, me - writing a patch to allow
that? It would take me a lot
On Wednesday 17 October 2012, you wrote:
P. Christeas x...@linux.gr writes:
It has been a fact that the RETURNING clause on an INSERT will return
multiple rows with the same order as multiple VALUES have been fed.
I don't believe this is a good idea in the slightest. Yeah, the current
