On 11/15/09 2:25 AM PST, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 08:43 -0800, Robert Hodges wrote:
I can help set up automated basic tests for hot standby using 1+1 setups on
Amazon. I¹m already working on tests for warm standby for our commercial
Tungsten
Hi Simon and Heikki,
I can help set up automated basic tests for hot standby using 1+1 setups on
Amazon. I¹m already working on tests for warm standby for our commercial
Tungsten implementation and need to solve the problem of creating tests that
adapt flexibly across different replication
Hi Greg and Fujii,
Just a point on terminology: there's a difference in the usage of
semi-synchronous between DRBD and MySQL semi-synchronous replication, which
was originally developed by Google.
In the Google case semi-synchronous replication is a quorum algorithm where
clients receive a
subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Robert Hodges, CTO, Continuent, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +1-510-501-3728 Skype: hodgesrm
mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Robert Hodges, CTO, Continuent, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +1-510-501-3728 Skype: hodgesrm
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers
. PostgreSQL will eventually be far better
as these discussions boil down into designs.
Thanks, Robert
On 8/12/08 8:51 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Wanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Hodges wrote:
Could you expand on why logical application of WAL records is impractical
the management headache of ensuring that triggers are correctly installed. It
seems as if one of these generic approaches could hook into WAL record
transport.
Cheers, Robert
On 7/10/08 4:56 AM, Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/10/08, Robert Hodges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a quick
directly. Meanwhile, we are quite serious about this problem
and intend to work on helpful additions to PostgreSQL in this area. I will
post more as we make progress.
Thanks, Robert
--
Robert Hodges, CTO, Continuent, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.s., Happy 12th birthday everyone!
Hi Hannu,
Hi Hannu,
On 6/1/08 2:14 PM, Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a consequence, I don¹t see how you can get around doing some sort
of row-based replication like all the other databases.
Is'nt WAL-base replication some sort of row-based replication ?
Yes, in theory.
://archives.postgresql.org
http://archives.postgresql.org
--
Robert Hodges, CTO, Continuent, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +1-510-501-3728 Skype: hodgesrm
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref
, Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Robert Hodges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Third, you can't stop with just this feature. (This is the BUT part of the
post.) The use cases not covered by this feature area actually pretty
large. Here are a few that concern
deserve
congratulations on an absolutely first-rate presentation.
On 5/29/08 9:09 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:05:18PM -0700, Robert Hodges wrote:
people are starting to get religion on this issue I would strongly
/08 9:05 PM, Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/29/08, Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:05:18PM -0700, Robert Hodges wrote:
people are starting to get religion on this issue I would strongly
advocate a parallel effort to put in a change-set extraction
.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Robert Hodges, CTO, Continuent, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +1-510-501-3728 Skype
that sometimes you get 'y' and sometimes
'z' as the final result?
If this case turns out to be deterministic, are there other cases that come
to mind that would turn out to be non-deterministic?
Thanks, Robert
--
Robert Hodges, CTO, Continuent, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +1-510-501
in master/master replication. If anything
else about this raises hackles on your neck (or anyone else's for that
matter) please let me know. It's better to know now. :)
Cheers, Robert
On 5/9/08 4:53 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Hodges [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This question may have
tool implementation.
We have an application at Continuent that depends on exactly this behavior.
I was investigating PostgreSQL semantics just last week and was delighted to
find they appear to be exactly right. Oracle on the other hand is going to
be a pain...
Cheers,
Robert Hodges
On 1/3/08
.
Cheers, Robert
Robert Hodges, CTO, Continuent, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +1-510-501-3728 Skype: hodgesrm
On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Mark Wong wrote:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:15:02 +
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 14:33 -0800, Mark Wong wrote:
On 11
18 matches
Mail list logo
