,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
if i am not totally wrong, this should give us a different result.
i am looking forward to see this patch in core :).
it is simply wonderful ...
many thanks,
hans
On Jul 3, 2008, at 1:11 AM, David Fetter wrote
'git://git.postgresql.org/git/~davidfetter/postgresql/.git' failed.
I ran git-update-server-info on the server, and it should work now. :)
I cannot get yet...
% cat ~/.gitconfig
[user]
name = Yoshiyuki Asaba
email = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# WITH RECURSIVE repository
not).
Thanks for the advice. I could get the repository via HTTP.
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
/git/~davidfetter/postgresql/.git'
failed.
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
{18,7} | 18-7
{26,13} | 26-13
{26,1} | 26-1
{26,12} | 26-12
{38,6} | 38-6
{38,17,9} | 38-17-9
{38,17,8} | 38-17-8
{38,15,10} | 38-15-10
{38,15,5,2} | 38-15-5-2
{38,15,5,3} | 38-15-5-3
(11 rows)
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sent via pgsql
;
count
---
100
(1 row)
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
;
if (tuplestore_gettupleslot(node-ss.ps.state-es_tuplestorestate,
true, slot))
return slot;
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
?
Couldn't we just have it pay attention to the existing
max_stack_depth?
Recursive query does not consume stack. The server enters an infinite
loop without consuming stack. Stack-depth error does not happen.
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
to deal with infinite streams of records.
I think it's the other way around. The server should not emit infinite
number of records.
How about adding new GUC parameter max_recursive_call?
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers
) at postmaster.c:1029
#21 0x081be07b in main (argc=1, argv=0x8456070) at main.c:188
-
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Hi,
From: Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb failed on Windows 2000
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:14:45 +0200
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 08:57:55AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Yoshiyuki Asaba wrote:
I have compiled PostgreSQL 8.2.4 with MinGW on Windows
Hi,
From: Yoshiyuki Asaba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] initdb failed on Windows 2000
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:46:35 +0900 (JST)
I have compiled PostgreSQL 8.2.4 with MinGW on Windows 2000. Then I
have executed initdb as Administrator. However initdb failed with the
following message
we're just being consistent. In fact, we're being more
liberal on Windows than on Unix because we make some provision for the
restricted token gadget.
Administrator can run initdb on Windows XP, Server 2003 and Vista.
Is this right?
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED
,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
From: Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore fails with a custom backup file
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:13:35 +0100
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 02:09:41PM +0900, Yoshiyuki Asaba wrote:
Does not compile on my MinGW - errors in the system headers (unistd.h,
io.h
]: *** [pg_dump] Error 1
$ uname -sr
MINGW32_NT-5.1 1.0.10(0.46/3/2)
Is MINGW version too old?
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index
/pg_restore with the attached
patch.
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: src/include/c.h
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/src/include/c.h,v
retrieving revision 1.214
diff -c -r1.214 c.h
*** src/include/c.h 4 Oct 2006
() and ftello(). So I think it limit to
handle a 2GB file. Is this a specification?
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:54:21 -0400
Yoshiyuki Asaba [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think libpq interface does not use non-blocking socket.
Not unless the Windows port has also disabled pg_set_noblock
, I think we should increase
SO_SNDBUF to more than 8192. I attache the patch.
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: pqcomm.c
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/libpq/pqcomm.c,v
retrieving revision 1.184
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:30:56 -0400
Yoshiyuki Asaba [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
send() may take as long as 200ms. So, I think we should increase
SO_SNDBUF to more than 8192. I attache the patch.
Why
changed a client
machine...
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:28:35 -0400
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:23:13AM +0900, Yoshiyuki Asaba wrote:
http
WIN32
+ /* establish control-C handling for interactive operation */
+ setup_cancel_handler();
+ #endif
+
successResult = SendQuery(options.action_string)
? EXIT_SUCCESS : EXIT_FAILURE;
}
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED
/_crt_tmpfile.asp
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
(). Win32's
tmpfile() creates the file into root folder. But non-administrator
users can't create files into root folder. So, I think it fails that
non-administrator users run pg_dump with -Ft option.
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast
27 matches
Mail list logo
