On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Sawada Masahiko
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Josh Berkus
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 08/23/2013 12:42 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
in case (a), those
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
What is happening here is that incase of '*' as priority of both
are same, system will choose whichever comes in list of
registered standby's first (list is maintained in structure
WalSndCtl). Each standby is registered with WalSndCtl when a new
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
What is happening here is that incase of '*' as priority of both
are same, system will choose whichever comes in list of
registered standby's first (list is maintained in
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 08/23/2013 12:42 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
in case (a), those priority is clear. So I think that re-taking over
is correct behaviour.
OHOT,
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 08/23/2013 12:42 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
in case (a), those priority is clear. So I think that re-taking over
is correct behaviour.
OHOT, in case (b), even if AAA and BBB are set same priority, AAA
server steals SYNC
Hi all,
I understand that setting synchronous_standby_name to '*' means that
all priority of standby server are same.
and the standby server, which connected to the master server at first,
become SYNC standby, another server become
ASYNC standby as potential server.
So, how to set the priority
On 08/23/2013 12:42 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
in case (a), those priority is clear. So I think that re-taking over
is correct behaviour.
OHOT, in case (b), even if AAA and BBB are set same priority, AAA
server steals SYNC replication.
I think it is better that BBB server continue behaviour
