[HACKERS] Comment typo in namespace.c

2016-01-06 Thread Amit Langote
Hi, Attached fixes a typo: s/non-exstant/non-existant. Alternatively, it could be spelled as 'existent' but the patch doesn't. Nor does it drop the 's' and spell it 'non-extant' which may have been the original intent. Thanks, Amit diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/namespace.c

Re: [HACKERS] Comment typo in namespace.c

2016-01-06 Thread Amit Langote
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Amit Langote writes: >> Attached fixes a typo: s/non-exstant/non-existant. >> Alternatively, it could be spelled as 'existent' but the patch doesn't. > > "non-existant" is flat wrong, so if

Re: [HACKERS] Comment typo in namespace.c

2016-01-06 Thread Tom Lane
Amit Langote writes: > Attached fixes a typo: s/non-exstant/non-existant. > Alternatively, it could be spelled as 'existent' but the patch doesn't. "non-existant" is flat wrong, so if we're going to fix typos, let's fix them to actually be English.

Re: [HACKERS] Comment typo in namespace.c

2016-01-06 Thread Tom Lane
Amit Langote writes: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> "non-existant" is flat wrong, so if we're going to fix typos, let's >> fix them to actually be English. > So, non-existent? non-extant? I seems to me like an 's' accidentally

Re: [HACKERS] Comment typo in namespace.c

2016-01-06 Thread Amit Langote
On 2016/01/07 1:03, Tom Lane wrote: > Amit Langote writes: >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> "non-existant" is flat wrong, so if we're going to fix typos, let's >>> fix them to actually be English. > >> So, non-existent?