On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Etsuro Fujita
wrote:
> The point in the previous patch was to update the list of expressions to be
> adjusted for the case of scanrelid=0 like that for the case of scanrelid>0
> case in set_foreignscan_references. So, I'd like to propose to add
> *fdw_recheck_qual
On 2015/12/11 2:21, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Etsuro Fujita
wrote:
Attached is a small patch to adjust a comment in setrefs.c; in
set_foreignscan_references, fdw_recheck_quals also gets adjusted to
reference foreign scan tuple, in case of a foreign join, so I added
"etc
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Etsuro Fujita
wrote:
> Attached is a small patch to adjust a comment in setrefs.c; in
> set_foreignscan_references, fdw_recheck_quals also gets adjusted to
> reference foreign scan tuple, in case of a foreign join, so I added
> "etc.", to a comment there, as the com
Hi,
Attached is a small patch to adjust a comment in setrefs.c; in
set_foreignscan_references, fdw_recheck_quals also gets adjusted to
reference foreign scan tuple, in case of a foreign join, so I added
"etc.", to a comment there, as the comment in case of a simple foreign
table scan.
Best regard