On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I'm definitely in agreement with Andres on this one. This isn't
> refactoring of little-to-never changed code, it's refactoring bits of
> the system which are changed with some regularity and looks likely to
> continue to need change as we a
Andres, Simon,
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
> On 2017-09-15 01:06:54 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > If we add something to an area then its a good time to refactor it
> > since we were going to get bugs anyway.
>
> We've added something to the area on a regular basis. As in last in
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andres Freund
> I think we should seriously consider doing a larger refactoring of this
> soon. I've some ideas about what to do, but I'd welcome some thoughts on
> whether others consider this a se
On 2017-09-15 01:06:54 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 14 September 2017 at 22:44, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> > The way we currently start and initialize individual postgres (sub-)
> > processes is pretty complicated and duplicative. I've a couple
> > complaints:
> ...
> > I think we should serious
On 14 September 2017 at 22:44, Andres Freund wrote:
> The way we currently start and initialize individual postgres (sub-)
> processes is pretty complicated and duplicative. I've a couple
> complaints:
...
> I think we should seriously consider doing a larger refactoring of this
> soon. I've so
Hi,
The way we currently start and initialize individual postgres (sub-)
processes is pretty complicated and duplicative. I've a couple
complaints:
1) It's completely non-obvious that bootstrap.c:AuxiliaryProcessMain()
can get invoked both via postmaster for subprocesses (startup, wal
writ
