On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 3/4/10 2:47 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> This TODO item really needs to be addressed for 9.0? Frankly I'm not
>> familiar with that area, so I've not work on it at all yet, but I'm
>> going to create the patch if many people want it for 9.0. Wha
On 3/4/10 2:47 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> This TODO item really needs to be addressed for 9.0? Frankly I'm not
> familiar with that area, so I've not work on it at all yet, but I'm
> going to create the patch if many people want it for 9.0. What is
> your opinion?
I think it falls under "nice to hav
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Currently superuser privilege is required when the standby connects
> to the primary. But there is the complaint that we should add new
> privilege for replication and use it instead of superuser because
> current approach is not good for securi
Hi,
Currently superuser privilege is required when the standby connects
to the primary. But there is the complaint that we should add new
privilege for replication and use it instead of superuser because
current approach is not good for security (*1). This has been listed
as one of TODO items of S
