Re: [HACKERS] old warning in docs

2014-02-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 07:34:20PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 07:19:46PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I have created the attached patch which removes many of the pre-8.0 > > > references, and trims some of the

Re: [HACKERS] old warning in docs

2014-02-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 07:19:46PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I have created the attached patch which removes many of the pre-8.0 > > references, and trims some of the 8.1-8.3 references. There are > > probably some of these that should

Re: [HACKERS] old warning in docs

2014-02-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have created the attached patch which removes many of the pre-8.0 > references, and trims some of the 8.1-8.3 references. There are > probably some of these that should be kept, but it is easier to show you > all the possibilities and we

Re: [HACKERS] old warning in docs

2014-02-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 08:43:27AM -0700, David Fetter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:51:44AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > > Given that we have not supported releases older than 8.3 for quite a > > while, do we need to keep this in extend.sgml any longer? > > > > > > > > C

Re: [HACKERS] old warning in docs

2013-10-08 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Oct 8, 2013 6:27 PM, "Robert Haas" wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Andrew Dunstan > wrote: > > Given that we have not supported releases older than 8.3 for quite a while, > > do we need to keep this in extend.sgml any longer? > > +1 for removing that (but only in master, not the bac

Re: [HACKERS] old warning in docs

2013-10-08 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Given that we have not supported releases older than 8.3 for quite a while, > do we need to keep this in extend.sgml any longer? +1 for removing that (but only in master, not the back-branches). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.ente

Re: [HACKERS] old warning in docs

2013-10-07 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:51:44AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Given that we have not supported releases older than 8.3 for quite a > while, do we need to keep this in extend.sgml any longer? > > > > Changing PG_CONFIG only works when building > against PostgreSQL 8.3 or la

[HACKERS] old warning in docs

2013-10-07 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Given that we have not supported releases older than 8.3 for quite a while, do we need to keep this in extend.sgml any longer? Changing PG_CONFIG only works when building against PostgreSQL 8.3 or later. With older releases it does not work to set it to anything except