On 2017/09/16 0:19, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
Have you had a chance to look at this such that we can expect a rebased version
of this patch during the commitfest?
Frankly, I think things where there was a ping multiple weeks before
the Commi
> On 15 Sep 2017, at 17:19, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Have you had a chance to look at this such that we can expect a rebased
>> version
>> of this patch during the commitfest?
>
> Frankly, I think things where there was a ping multipl
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Have you had a chance to look at this such that we can expect a rebased
> version
> of this patch during the commitfest?
Frankly, I think things where there was a ping multiple weeks before
the CommitFest started and no rebase before i
> On 15 Aug 2017, at 01:00, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>
> On 4/3/17 22:00, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> On 2017/04/04 3:21, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> On 2017-02-28 21:45:22 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
Here is a patch for $subject.
>>>
>>> This is a nontrivial patch, submitted just before the sta
On 4/3/17 22:00, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On 2017/04/04 3:21, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2017-02-28 21:45:22 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>> Here is a patch for $subject.
>>
>> This is a nontrivial patch, submitted just before the start of the last
>> CF for postgres 10. Therefore I think we should
On 2017/04/04 3:21, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2017-02-28 21:45:22 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
Here is a patch for $subject.
This is a nontrivial patch, submitted just before the start of the last
CF for postgres 10. Therefore I think we should move this to the next
CF.
Honestly, I'm not satis
Hi,
On 2017-02-28 21:45:22 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Here is a patch for $subject.
This is a nontrivial patch, submitted just before the start of the last
CF for postgres 10. Therefore I think we should move this to the next
CF.
- Andres
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hac
Hi,
Here is a patch for $subject. This is the same as what I proposed in
combination with a feature for full joins [1]; this would allow us to
push down left/right/full joins with PHVs to the remote and improve how
to deparse whole-row references. Since this is implemented on top of
the
