On 2014-02-09 12:38:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Andres Freund
> > wrote:
> >> Why? We do have other options with aliases for option values and all
> >> other enum option has taken care not to need spaces.
>
> > I think that's probably mos
Robert Haas writes:
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Why? We do have other options with aliases for option values and all
>> other enum option has taken care not to need spaces.
> I think that's probably mostly a happy coincidence; I'm not committed
> to a policy of ens
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-02-09 12:00:02 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > So I still think we should add read_committed, repeatable_read as aliases.
>>
>> Like Tom, I'm -1 on this. This is fixing the prob
On 2014-02-09 12:00:02 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > So I still think we should add read_committed, repeatable_read as aliases.
>
> Like Tom, I'm -1 on this. This is fixing the problem from the wrong end.
Why? We do have other options with
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-02-04 12:02:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund writes:
>> > On 2014-02-04 11:36:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> -1. This is not a general solution to the problem. There are other
>> >> GUCs for which people might want spaces
Hi Tom,
On 2014-02-04 12:02:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2014-02-04 11:36:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> -1. This is not a general solution to the problem. There are other
> >> GUCs for which people might want spaces in the value.
>
> > Sure, I didn't say it was. Bu
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2014-02-04 11:36:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> -1. This is not a general solution to the problem. There are other
>> GUCs for which people might want spaces in the value.
> Sure, I didn't say it was. But I don't see any oother values that are
> likely being passed via
On 2014-02-04 11:36:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > PGOPTIONS='-c default_transaction_isolation=serializable' \
> > psql ... -c "SHOW default_transaction_isolation"
> > works well enough, but
> > PGOPTIONS='-c default_transaction_isolation=repeatable read' \
> > psql
Andres Freund writes:
> PGOPTIONS='-c default_transaction_isolation=serializable' \
> psql ... -c "SHOW default_transaction_isolation"
> works well enough, but
> PGOPTIONS='-c default_transaction_isolation=repeatable read' \
> psql ... -c "SHOW default_transaction_isolation"
> doesn't, bec
Hi,
I recently had the need to bury the used isolation level in the
connection string, but it turns out that doesn't work that well...
PGOPTIONS='-c default_transaction_isolation=serializable' \
psql ... -c "SHOW default_transaction_isolation"
works well enough, but
PGOPTIONS='-c default_tran
10 matches
Mail list logo
