Jim Nasby wrote:
On Feb 5, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My suggestions would be
1. Database system has completed recovery and
2. Database system is ready to accept connections
The second was in fact the wording I had in mind, sorry for not being
On Feb 5, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My suggestions would be
1. Database system has completed recovery and
2. Database system is ready to accept connections
The second was in fact the wording I had in mind, sorry for not being
clear. As to the
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 14:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Markus Schiltknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is there a good reason to print the database system is ready message
in StartupXLOG() in xact.c? It has a) nothing to do with xlog and b)
opens a small race condition: the message gets
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My suggestions would be
1. Database system has completed recovery and
2. Database system is ready to accept connections
The second was in fact the wording I had in mind, sorry for not being
clear. As to the first, the question is whether a log message at
Markus Schiltknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is there a good reason to print the database system is ready message
in StartupXLOG() in xact.c? It has a) nothing to do with xlog and b)
opens a small race condition: the message gets printed, while it still
take some CPU cycles until the
Hi,
Tom Lane wrote:
I don't think there's any compelling reason for having that log message
in its current form. What about redefining it to mean postmaster is
ready to accept connections --- either with that wording, or keeping
the old wording? Then we could just put it in one place in
