I wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It could certainly be done. In general, I have generally taken the view
that owners have the responsibility for monitoring their own machines.
Sure, but providing them tools to do that seems within buildfarm's
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Dunstan
Sent: 27 September 2006 14:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Buildfarm alarms
If some intrepid buildfarm owner wants to test
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
The settings are in hours, so this says that if we haven't seen a HEAD build
in 1 day or a stable branch build in 1 week, alert the owner by email, and
keep repeating the alert in each case every 2 days.
How does this know if there wasn't a
Kris Jurka wrote:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
The settings are in hours, so this says that if we haven't seen a
HEAD build in 1 day or a stable branch build in 1 week, alert the
owner by email, and keep repeating the alert in each case every 2 days.
How does this know if
-Original Message-
From: Michael Meskes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 September 2006 08:57
To: Joachim Wieland
Cc: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Buildfarm alarms
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:20:19PM +0200, Joachim Wieland wrote:
Michael, could you
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:57:16AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
OK, I now see just one, date format related failure:
...
Did you run it with Joachim's patch or with up-to-date CVS checkout? It
seems to me that you do not have the latest changes to CVS. We added a
set datestyle to variable.pgc that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Page
Sent: 26 September 2006 10:41
To: Michael Meskes
Cc: Joachim Wieland; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Buildfarm alarms
-Original Message-
From
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 02:23:39PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
testing connect/test1.pgc ... FAILED (log)
testing compat_informix/dec_test.pgc ... FAILED (output)
testing preproc/variable.pgc ... FAILED (log, output)
testing pgtypeslib/dt_test.pgc
-Original Message-
From: Michael Meskes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 September 2006 10:39
To: Dave Page
Cc: Joachim Wieland; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Buildfarm alarms
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:57:16AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
OK, I now see
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:51:49AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
wrong to the monitoring processes - what had happened was that both had
hung or got in an inifinite loop in ECPG-check, the machine was running
just fine
Is this still an issue? Can you provide more information? What happens if you
run
-Original Message-
From: Joachim Wieland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 September 2006 13:25
To: Dave Page
Cc: Andrew Dunstan; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Buildfarm alarms
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:51:49AM +0100, Dave Page
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 September 2006 03:13
To: Dave Page
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Buildfarm alarms
It could certainly be done. In general, I have generally
taken the view
that owners have the
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It could certainly be done. In general, I have generally taken the view
that owners have the responsibility for monitoring their own machines.
Sure, but providing them tools to do that seems within buildfarm's
purview.
For some types
Dave Page wrote:
I'm just investigating a problem with beta 1 running on Windows 2K and
XP, and noticed that neither Snake or Bandicoot have built -HEAD for
nearly 3 weeks. I'm investigating why and will fix the problem, but it
strikes me that what would be useful is an alarm email from the
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It could certainly be done. In general, I have generally taken the view
that owners have the responsibility for monitoring their own machines.
Sure, but providing them tools to do that seems within buildfarm's
purview.
For some types of failure, the
15 matches
Mail list logo
